Reflections on the Journey

New Blog Site is Open

2009-04-06T08:09:00.003-05:00

Friends,

I have finally gotten a grip on the new website (I think). Statrting tomorrow, I will be posting the "Take Two" material as well as other stuff to my new blogsite. The address is www.chrisaiken.wordpress.com. Please look for new posts, etc. at that location. Eventually, I will shut down this site completely.

Why? Because the new site is a bit more functional for my needs and it includes spell check....a much needed feature before 7AM.

Simply add the new address to your favorites and start using that site...PLEASE :-)

See you soon!
Grace and Peace,
Chris.

Take Two: James 2, Proverbs 6

2009-04-06T06:10:00.003-05:00

James 2 opens with an admonition against partiality. In James 2:1-7, he addresses the different treatments of the rich man and the poor man. He is speaking a principle here that uses a hypothetical example. As God's people, we are not to judge and LIMIT access to God based on a standard seen in our culture. We should show no special favor to a rich man simply because he is rich. Both the rich and poor have the same access to salvation by God's grace. At the same time, we are not to show favoritism toward the poor man (class envy). Worldly wealth is not a barometer of holiness or an indicator of God's favor. Men are to be treated according to their possession of Jesus as Lord and Savior...not according to their wealth.

Some may have begun to argue (at least in their minds) that if they were guilty, it was only of a "small sin"...and was no big deal in God's eyes. James 2:8-13 reminds us that to be guilty of one sin makes us guilty. To obey one aspect of God's law and not another...still makes us guilty under the Law. NOTE: For those who may say..."Whew! We are under grace and not the Law...so this doesn't apply to us." NOT SO! Remember real religion is the life of holiness. We are called to live holy lives (James 1:27).

Some may begin to object...saying that our relationship with God is not dependent on our works...but by faith alone. This is true...but what kind of faith? Are we speaking of mental ascent (an intellectual agreement with a set of facts); Or, are we speaking of a saving faith? James explores the distinction in the remainder of the chapter.

"Faith" without corresponding action based on that faith is not really faith...at least not the "saving kind" (James 2:14-17). Even the demons (who are obviously not in the "saved" category) know and accept/believe the facts about God (James 2:18-20). The faith that saves always manifests itself with corresponding works (James 2:20-26).

Works do not save us. God saves us when we respond to Him by faith. Our response to Him is evident in our actions. Our "confession" of belief in a set of facts is no more effective in "saving" us than anything in the world. Our response to the God the facts speak of...is one of faith and is evident by our actions. As someone said, "what you do speaks so loudly, I cannot hear what you say."

Proverbs 6:30-31 is the takeaway today. There is understanding when a man sins because he is overwhelmed by his need. This is not an excuse...but an explanation. Still, the man must repay/make restitution for his sin. He is not absolved from responsibility simply because he was overwhelmed.

Take Two: James 1, Proverbs 5

2009-04-05T06:04:00.003-05:00

The Book of James is one of my favorites in the New Testament. It is penned, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, by James, the half-brother of Jesus. The time of writing is prior to AD 67 and many believe a decade before.

James was a prominent figure in the early church...seen as the leader of the Jerusalem church. His teachings are similar in many respects to those of the gospels...and certainly indicate his close affinity and familiarity with the manner and teachings of Jesus Himself. Much like Paul, James gives us a picture of what is NORMAL Christianity as it is understood by those who were not among the 12 disciples but had first hand knowledge of Christ's teachings.

Throughout the years, some controversy has arisen about the focus on "works" in James' letter. Some (influenced by Reformation teaching) have read from the Letter that James is presenting a view that is contrary to a "Salvation by Grace through Faith" message as presented by Paul. Luther quipped often that he could not reconcile the teachings of James and Paul...and called the Letter a "bit strawy epistle," indicating his limited respect for it. He even noted that he would have preferred to remove the letter from the Canon were it up to him.

A better approach is to understand the teachings in their context. James does not write (prominently) about "how" to be saved; rather, he presumes salvation upon his audience. He speaks more prominently about the outworking of salvation by those who name the Name of Christ. There is a definite "eschatological" theme apparent in the letter. In other words, James has constantly in mind...the Day of the Lord. In light of the coming reunion with Jesus, one should conduct Himself in a certain manner.

As He speaks of the Law, his reference is more to the decalogue (the 10 Commandments) than to the Jewish ceremonial Law; however, he does refer to the royal law as in the Kingdom of God...in context.

James 1:1 addresses the letter to the dispersed Jews of the 12 tribes. It seems that the audience is under persecution of sorts for their alignment with Christianity. The focus on the twelve tribes is an allusion to the Old Testament imagery of God's people.

James 1:2-4 gives a perspective on how to view our circumstances/trials/pressures. We are to "consider" them joy, knowing that God uses the trials of life to perfect our faith. This is not a reference to making us perfect (as if sinless perfection were even possible; rather, it means developing a maturity as we examine the circumstances of life.)

James 1:5-9 speaks to the fact that God gives wisdom to all who seek after it in faith and without doubting. The implication is that if a person claims to seek the wisdom of God but doubts...he is unstable. He vacillates between godly wisdom and worldly wisdom. This man should expect to gain nothing from the wisdom of God.

The trials that God uses to perfect us are not temptations (James 1:13-15). God does not desire our failure, but our perfection. To look at the trial and the temptation at face value...there is little distinction; however, it is important to know that God never desires our demise...but our victory.

James "focuses" on the assertion that there should be a corresponding action to our stated beliefs. We should be "doers" and not "hearers" only (James 1:22-25). It is not enough for us to have a confessional faith...we must have a faith that reveals itself in application. This is very clear in James 1:26-27. If anyone claims to be a Christian but does not seek to care for those in need...who are most vulnerable in society (widows and orphans), then his faith is worthless. The second characteristic of genuine faith is that the Christian seeks to be holy (unstained by the world). Any professing believer who is comfortable participating in the world's rebellion against God...has an empty and ineffectual faith in God. ALL CHRISTIANS who understand what it is to name the NAME of Jesus...are uncomfortable with their own propensity to sin and bemoan their sinful actions.

Proverbs 5:3 is the takeaway today. The enticement to sin is attractive to us. It is always presented as sweet and pleasant...smooth and wonderful. BEWARE. It's end is bitter and results in death. FLEE from sin and avoid the conversation with that which seeks to detour you from the path of righteousness.

Take Two: Amos 9, Proverbs 4

2009-04-04T06:23:00.003-05:00

Amos 9 is the final chapter. As has been the case to this point, the prophet, speaking for God, states that God will destroy the sinful people among the Kingdom (Amos 9:10). God is Sovereign and is responsible for all that is coming their way. He will use every nation and every circumstance as an instrument of His will and His wrath...to root out the sinful independence and arrogance of His people.

Amos 9:1-4 gives a number of scenarios where the people might seem out of reach of God's wrath. In each case, God deals with them where they are. He is to be feared because the people, to this point, have spurned Him and rejected His leadership in their lives. Amos 9:5-6 speaks to God's ultimate power and the enormity of His sovereignty. Nothing is beyond Him or exceeds Him.

Amos 9:7-10 restates that the people, because of their actions, have estranged themselves from God...not the other way around. Their sin has caused/prompted God to treat them as a people that are not His own.

I find it interesting that even in the midst of the rebellion of the people, God does not forsake them. He judges them and punishes them...but He never loses track of them. He never forgets them or takes His eye off of them. Yes...it is a dangerous thing to sin under the watchful eye of God; however, it is a comforting thing to know that no circumstance occurs that is beyond the watchful eye of God. Nothing that happens in your life escapes His notice...for good or bad.

Amos 9:11-15 gives the prophesy of restoration. After the judgment...the people will be restored...not by their own efforts but by God. They will again possess honor, dignity, provision, and blessing. God is not opposed to blesing His people. God is opposed to His people trusting in the BLESSING rather than the One who BLESSES! When they are established again...this time by God...they will never be rooted out or lose their status. It seems that this is a reference to the Millenial Kingdom of Christ (Amos 9:15).

Proverbs 4:18 is the takeaway today. As I read this, I saw (for the first time now) that the path of righteousness does not always appear so in the beginning. In fact, it is only as one continues on the path of the righteous that it is illuminated to full day. When we choose God's path and continue on it, it becomes very clear that it is a wise and good path. Even if we cannot fully appreciate this in the beginning...the full day reveals the wisdom of our choice.

Tomorrow we return to a NT study. See you in the book of James.....

Take Two: Amos 8, Proverbs 3

2009-04-03T06:52:00.003-05:00

In the midst of the funeral arrangements this week, there was a pretty common thread among many of us who were caught off-guard by the cicumstances of Mom's death. Many kept saying, "I can't believe it. I hoped that when I woke up this morning, I would discover it wasn't true."

In many ways, some people look at God's judgment and justice similarly. We know what God says...but in many ways, we hope we will wake up to discover it isn't true. The remaining chapters of Amos continue the theme and drive home the point, God will not relent. He has pronounced judgment on the people and will carry it out...not because He is bad or vengeful, but because He is good and just.

The first vision of the chapter (Amos 8:1-3) serves to tie together chapter 7 and 8. The picture is one of harvest time. When farmers plant, they look forward to th harvest. It always comes. It may yield good or bad or plenteous or sparse fruit...but the time of harvest always comes.

Amos 8:4-14 is really a taunt (of sorts) to the people to keep going with their immoral and unethical...ungodly deeds. Judgment is coming because God never forgets anything. Every deed will be reconciled (Amos 8:7).

No one in Amos' audience should look forward to the day because it is characteristically apocalyptic (Amos 8:9). This day of judgment will be more than the people can bear.

As a NT Christian, looking back on history from the completed side of the cross...I am fully aware and sensitive to the fact that all sin (just as listed here) is paid for individually and amazingly. Either each person will give account and bear the weight of his own sin (choosing to bear it alone as an independent and autonomous being), or it will be born by Christ at the Cross (Romans 5:8, 1 John 2:2, John 3:16, Romans 6:23). Nevertheless, all sin is judged.

Proverbs 3:27 is the takeaway. Sometimes, we are tempted to make rational decisions about resources. We may see needs around us and look into the pantry. We realize that we can meet the need, but the uncertainty of tomorrow prompts us to consider holding back. The proverb instructs us to step forward and meet the need. We are instruments of God's provision for someone else...and God will always provide for us...just as He does for them through us.

Grace,

Take Two: Amos 7, Proverbs 2

2009-04-02T06:44:00.004-05:00

I apologize for the sporadic nature of posting. Those who know what is going on...can understand. If you don't know...then please forgive me for my inconsistency and pick up with me now.

Amos 7 begins the next section of the book. The first part dealt with the "words" of Amos and the balance of the book deals with the "visions" of Amos. In the first two visions, God reveals an instrument of destruction. The prophet intercedes for the people and God relents from His intended judgment (Amos 7:1-6). Both visions are similar...with the exception of the fact that the instrument of judgment shifts from locusts to fire.

Amos 7:7-9 gives a vision fo the plumb line. A plumb line is used in constructing walls to insure that the walls are straight and will continue to stand. If a wall was not built straight (plumb), it would be destroyed by the builder or it would fail under the test of time. God revealed the significance of the plumb line to Amos and told him that He would examine and judge Israel...but the means of judgment is not revealed. Two reasons for the judgment are implied.

First, there is the mention of the high places and sanctuaries (Amos 7:9). This is an indictment against the religious structures. Second is due to the government of the nation which is symbolized by the King's mention.

Amos 7:10-17 details the resistance of the culture to Amos' words. The high priest of Bethel accuses Amos of sedition and treason to the king (Amos 7:10). The priest's loyalty was to the king and not to God. Amaziah discounts the vision of Amos and orders him gone...declaring that the worship center at Bethel was of the King (Amos 7:12-13). Amos declared that the visions and the impetus to prophesy were not his own...but were of God. He then prophesied against the high priest declaring that he and his children would die by the sword. Further, all of his holdings would be lost and his wife would become a prostitute to support herself. Also, Israel would still come under judgment.

Should you read this and think it harsh...remember that Israel had come to depend on their own prosperity rather than God. Therefore, the judgment was against that which took the place of God.

Proverbs 2:9 is the takeaway today. By acquiring wisdom, we gain the ability to discern in any given circumstance, that which is righteous, just, fair, and proper. It is not that God gives us some secret knowledge or some special dispensation necessarily; however, He does give us, through applying His Word, the ability to find the "God aspect" of a circumstance and act appropriately.

Grace,

Take Two: Amos 6, Proverbs 31

2009-03-31T07:55:00.003-05:00

Amos 6 continues the picture of judgment of God that is coming against Israel. In chapter 5, the indictment came against the "cows of bashan." the wives who demanded fine things which were secured by exacting interest and excessive charges against the poor. In chapter 6, we observe the addressee to be those who are living the life of luxury and security without God (Amos 6:1).

The addressee is told to "live it up." By doing so, they do not negate the judgment that is coming (Amos 6:7).

The final section (Amos 6:8-14) pictures the certainty of the judgment. Some may have come to question whether God had changed. Perhaps, they thought, God was no longer offended at the arrogant and luxurious lifestyle and the means by which it was secured. The prophet's response is simply that God has sworn by Himself (Amos 6:8)...so God has not changed.

A curious phrase occurs in Amos 6:10. To mention the Name of the Lord...or as one commentator put it...to call on God for help...would not bring relief but destruction...since God was responsible for the calamity that was upon them anyway.

Proverbs 31:31 is the takeaway. In speaking of the "excellent wife" or as some call her, the "P31" woman, the proverb ends with give her the product of her hands and let her works praise her. She is not known for her philosophy or good intentions. She is known for how she lived. She gains credibility based on the fruits of her labor. There are many people who are quick to espouse good ideas and good intentions. The P31 woman...says look at the results. Let them, and them alone, be the standard for which my life is measured.

Take Two: Amos 5, Proverbs 29

2009-03-29T06:21:00.003-05:00

The plot or theme becomes more clear in this chapter. Remember that Amos began by asserting God's Sovereignty over His Creation...and His people. All of the calamity to come upon the nations and upon Israel was because God caused it. The people were religious in their actions; however, they had become dependent on their prosperity and addicted to pleasures.

Part of the religious "buzz" of the era was to speak of the "Day of the Lord." For those speaking it, it was supposed to be a day of triumph and blessing and honor. They spoke of it as if they were excited and anticipating it. Amos gives them another perspective.

The Day of the Lord is coming...but you should hide because He is not pleased with your conduct! It is a day of victory and glory and honor...but He will display these things by punishing the wicked...you! (Amos 5:18).

The solution is to forsake their practices and seek the Lord! (Amos 5:4, Amos 5:6, Amos 5:14). They thought that they were seeking God...after all they had many altars and practiced religion all of the time. God's response was that their worship was empty and He hated it (Amos 5:21-23). What God desired was justice and mercy...a lifestyle consistent with their religious confession...not a religious confession alone (Amos 5:24).

Because they were hypocritical...they had made a mockery of God; therefore, they would lose everything (Amos 5:11), and only a remnant would survive His judgment (Amos 5:3). Instead of making a "fuss" claiming to be looking forward to the Day of the Lord...they should have kept silent...since they were unprepared (Amos 5:12-13).

Some of them may have desired to argue with Amos...that he was a fundamentalist and had no basis for his claims. He closes the chapter by reminding them that their ancestors were punished for idolatry as well...a fate they could look forward to if they did not repent (Amos 5:25-27).

Sometimes it is difficult to think that we are idolatrous in our actions when we come together on Sunday to worship God. We sing songs of His faithfulness, His power, His justice...and then we rely upon other things...including our own wisdom as if they were powerful to provide and care for us. This is bad...but becomes worse when we think that no one else sees through our charade...including God. Either He is...and He is worthy of our lives...or He is not...and we should choose our alternatives. We cannot continue, though, to claim that He is our hope AND pursue other hopes as if God is not offended at our duplicity.

Proverbs 29:16 is the takeaway today. As wickedness increases, it seems as though there is no hope for righteousness...but the Day of the Lord is coming...and Righteousness will prevail.

Grace,

Take Two: Amos 4, Proverbs 28

2009-03-28T08:16:00.003-05:00

Amos 4 is pretty harsh...but is a judgment oracle of God. In Amos 4:1 the prophet addresses the rich women of the court of Samaria (though some believe that both men and women are in view) as "cows of Bashan." The reference is to their indulgent lifestyle which was unable to be satisfied. The attempt to satisfy this desire resulted in oppression of the poor. The prophesy against them is in Amos 4:2-3 where their utter destruction is pictured. They will all die and be carried away.

Amos 4:4-5 is a "parody" on the call to worship. Amos calls the people to go to their false altars at Bethel and Gilgal...to sin and sin again. Bring your offerings and carry on with your religious activity; however, God will not listen and will only charge you with the sin of idolatry. Regardless of whether they brought offerings every three days or every three years, they would oppress the poor for their own properity every other day. This not only invalidated their worship...but became a source of indictment against them.

Think of it as a flaunting one's sin before God. It is like coming to church with unconfessed sin...or leaving a church having rejected an invitation to repent and respond to God. Ultimately...this is flaunting one's rebellion before a Holy God.

Amos 4:6-13 is a succession of statements of how God had disciplined His people yet they would not return. Even when difficulties came, they turned inward for answers and refused to return to God. Therefore (Amos 4:12) God declared His righteous judgment against them.

It is a dangerous thing to ignore the call of a Holy God to repent and return. Sometimes, as with a man this week, the voice of God calling becomes muffled and quieted after prolonged rebellion. Meanwhile the weight of sin guilt builds up and weighs down. At other times, God more actively brings judgment. Either way...it is a dangerous thing.

I might encourage you to seek after God and seek to know if there is unconfessed sin or failure to respond with obedience that weighs on your life. While the weight of God's judgment is heavy, the arms of God's Son are strong. He seeks to pick you up, restore you, remove the weight, and re-send you into the harvest as God's special children and Ambassadors of Grace. The decisions is yours alone.

Proverbs 28:13 is the takeaway today. Confess and forsake. They key to abundant life.

Grace,

Take Two: Amos 3, Proverbs 27

2009-03-27T05:47:00.003-05:00

Having concluded the opening discourse of God's judgment, the prophet moves to explain the "why" of God's judgment against His people. When I was a child and my dad would punish me, the "talk" before the spanking was the worst! He would say to me, "I am doing this because I love you." In other words, because we have this special relationship (father/son) I am going to punish you. I used to think, "love me less!"

Amos 3:1-2 gives the basis for what is coming. Listen to the prophesy against God's people...those whom He rescued/chose for His own and delivered from the Egyptians. Amos 3:2, I chose you and no one else, therefore I will visit your sins upon you...or better: since I have chosen you above all others, I will punish your sins and bring the effects of your sin upon you.

God asserts His sovereignty here. He reminds the people that He alone chose them for His own purpose. He chose them alone as His people. He took them from out of Egypt (which did not fit into the Egyptians long range plan) because He alone chose to. He alone chose the covenant for their relationship...so He alone would punish their sin. It is key to remember that God is not claiming for Himself some new authority here. He was and always will be Sovereign. This is not news to us or to Israel. God is...period. He is now announcing that He will act within His sovereign bounds to right that which is wrong and punish the transgressions of His people who have "presumed" upon God's grace and forsaken His covenant.

Amos 3:3-6 contains 7 questions which are a rhetorical (speech) device. The answers are implied in the questions. The common thread with all of the questions is the CAUSE-EFFECT relationship. The questions are sufficient if taken only proverbially...but there is cause to see God and Israel in each of the questions as well. The purpose of the first six questions is to gain the agreement of the audience and then connect the dots to the prophet's assertion: "If we (the city) are under a calamity...did not God cause it?" Whatever judgment coming against Israel will be the direct and explicit outworking of God's will. He would use actions to accomplish it (as He did in Egypt) but He is the One responsible.

That may be a hard word for you to grasp...it is to me. At the same time though...it is hard for me to punish my children. I do not enjoy it...but if I do not address their shortcomings/sin/ failures...how will they know how to view them? No one but me (as their father) can address them...because like God with Israel...I have the special relationship.

Like me with my father, and my children with me...it is difficult to appreciate (in the midst of punishment) the heart behind the action. I never sought out my dad's punishment. I did not appreciate receiving the punishment. I only look back and am thankful for his actions (without consensus with me at the time), through which he sought my best interest.

Amos 3:7 connects the Cause-Effect relationship idea with the pronouncement to come. It simply notes that God wants the people to know what is coming and why...so He is pre-disclosing His intentions through the prophet. The prophet's message should be heeded, because it is a message from the Sovereign God who acts.

Amos 3:8, as the lion's roar struck fear in the animal, so the Word of the Lord should strike fear in His people. The Lion has roared...and God has spoken.

Amos 3:9-10 is the imagery of a legal proceeding. Bring witnesses from among the pagan nations. They do not know how to even do "right." They hoard up possessions in their citadels and treasuries. Amos 3:11 states that the enemy surrounding Israel will be used (by the Sovereign God) to tear down Israel's citadels and loot them. Remember from Chapter 1 that Israel was experiencing prosperity and a corresponding decline in authentic worship/morality.

Amos 3:12-15 uses the imagery, not of a legal proceeding, but of a shepherd. If a predator came in and killed a sheep, the shepherd had to produce evidence (pieces) or reimburse the owner for the missing animal. So, the imagery used indicates the total destruction of Israel...with only an evidence of their former existence. (Think REMNANT). God's judgment will begin with the altars of Bethel (due to the false worship taking place there) and would continue in affecting every area of Israel's lives and possessions...including summer and winter houses. No aspect of their lives shall escape God's judgment.

More imagery to come...tomorrow.

Proverbs 27:20 is the takeaway today. Neither death, nor hell are ever satisfied. They continually seek more. They do not reach capacity. Such is also the longing for man. I have never met a man who was "by nature" satisfied with what he possessed. I have met a few who are content and had disciplined themselves to restrain from continual pursuit of possessions...but it required discipline. We never come to the place where we are satisfied with what we have...so do not fall for the lie, "If I get this...then I will be content." It is not true. Contentment does not come with accumulation, only with choosing to be satisfied with what one already possesses. This usually corresponds with a thankful heart.

Take Two: Amos 2, Proverbs 26

2009-03-26T06:17:00.003-05:00

The prophetic oracle continues in Chapter 2. In fact, there is no break between the two. God has pronounced judgment agains the neighboring nations to the northeast, southwest, northwest, and southeast. He then moves on, in this chapter to Judah in the South and to Israel (Northern Kingdom) itself.

The sins of Moab relate to the desecration of an Edomite (enemy) king's body (Amos 2:1-3). This is an example of vengence and devaluing of the dignity of man.

Now moving on to God's "Covenant" people...Judah's sin relates to the breaking of God's Covenant with them (Amos 2:4-5). They rejected God's Law. It is interesting that the sins of breaking God's Law/Covenant are equivalent to and warrant the same judgment as the sins of the nations. Defying an instruction of God is no different than killing a pregnant woman for material prosperity (Amos 1:13) or exacting revenge against an enemy king (Amos 2:1-3).

CONSEQUENTLY...I wonder in Christians living in the New Covenant era (us) see the rejection of God's instruction (to forgive, to tithe, to worship together, to care for the oppressed, etc.) as required or optional? Do we recognize that God has not changed? If God required certain activities from His people as a basis of Covenant relationship...should we expect that God expects LESS from people under His New Covenant which He instituted through the sacrificial death of His own Son? Do Christians today see a diminished responsibility to obedience since we live under Grace? Are we then being presumptive and assuming that God will treat us differently and requires a diminished level of commitment since we live in the NT era?

Now the focus moves to the sins of the audience to whom Amos speaks. Israel had become immersed with material prosperity. To gain financially, they would act as shrewd business people...and would act mercilessly (Amos 2:6). They (figuratively) trampled upon the poor..driving their heads into the dirt of the ground (Amos 2:7). Both a father and son would have sexual relations with a female slave, in violation of God's covenant (Amos 2:7). They would worship at altars they constructed (without God's direction...consequently) in a manner that was outward rather than inward (Amos 2:8). In fact, they would prostrate on garments taken from the poor (in violation of the covenant) and drink the wine that was taken through altar fines and tax...for their own benefit (equivalent to setting up a "no cussing" jar in your office...and using the proceeds to go buy a bottle of liquor to drink.) In other words, they had turned religious worship into a profit center as well...

The more prosperous they were financially, the further they strayed from God positionally. And God saw all of it! In Amos 2:9-12, God (through the prophet) points out that the basis for Israel's existence was God's grace toward them and God's victory over their enemies. Yet...in the face of Grace, they had turned toward profiteering over faithfulness.

The pronouncement of judgment is different against Israel (Amos 2:13-16). Literary critics believe it is for rhetorical purposes. It certainly does serve to build the suspense...even though the anticipation and outcome are the same. God will judge Israel and they will be powerless to resist.

We, as God's people, are required to approach God on His terms and not our own. This relates not only to our worship hours...but to every part of our lives.

Proverbs 26:24-25 is the takeaway today. A man's heart is often masked by the words that he says. We are not called to evaluate a man by what he says...but by what is in his heart...which ultimately bears itself out in his actions.

Take Two: Amos 1, Proverbs 25

2009-03-25T07:16:00.004-05:00

As we begin the Book of Amos, a little background will help us keep the message in context. Amos is the first of 4 eighth Century prophets. He prophesied around 765-760 BC. His audience was the Northern Kingdom (Israel). In the context of Scripture, he precedes Hosea (in the North) and Isaiah and Micah in the South (Judah).

Assyria is the world power at the time and is somewhat preoccupied with other enemies, so there is little attention paid to Israel and Judah. Both Israel and Judah were on friendly terms of cooperation at this time leading to expansion of both kingdoms, economic prosperity, and an increase in "religious activity." (i.e. animal sacrifices were up. A modern way of saying this is that there was an increased "awareness of and adherence to "forms" of spirituality.)

However, at the same time,

" the period was characterized by moral and spiritual decline and by social
upheaval. Israel’s frequent attendance at the shrines to make sacrifices did not
result in moral, spiritual, and social uprightness. The rich oppressed the poor,
indulged in extravagant lifestyles, denied justice to the oppressed, and engaged
in immoral sexual activities (2:6–8; 4:1; 5:11–13). Israel’s moral and spiritual
decline, plus the social upheaval brought on by greed, contradicted their
accelerated religious activities. Such were the times of Amos’s arrival in
Israel with a strong message of judgment from God. Israel’s outward show of
devotion to God, contradicted by their moral, spiritual, and social problems,
called for a discerning and courageous prophet." (Billy K. Smith and Franklin S.
Page, vol. 19B, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, electronic ed., Logos Library System; The
New American Commentary (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 2001,
c1995), 26.).

So, as we recap the overview...Amos is a layperson, raised up by God to pronounce God's Message to the people. Remember, interpreting the Message of Scripture cannot be done without consideration of the "Covenant." Amos is not running to each nation mentioned here (as Jonah did to Nenveh), but is preaching to God's Covenant people. So, the judgments pronounced in this first section need to be understood in this manner: "What does God's judgment against these people have to do with me?"

Amos 1:1 introduces the prophet and gives the particulars of when he wrote. Amos 1:2 expresses the nature of the message: The Judgment of a Sovereign and Holy God is being unleashed.

Damascus is the first to be mentioned. This is the Capital of Aram (the Arameans) which is a lonstanding enemy of Israel. It is located to the Northeast of Israel. Amos 1:3-5 states that due to their mistreatment of Gilead (which seems to be the sin that "broke the camel's back), God is going to judge them.

Philistia and its capitol Gaza are next to be noted. They were located to the Southwest of Israel. Amos 1:6-8 notes God's judgment against them as well.

Amos 1:9-10 notes the judgment against Tyre (to the Northwest of Israel) which was a center of wealth and influence of the Phoenecians. One of their commodities was slavery. Their sin was a violation of the covenant of brotherhood...likely a reference to breaking a treaty...WHICH IS A VERY SERIOUS OFFENSE WITH GOD.

Amos 1:11-15 give two other peoples who will feel the judgment of God. Edom (the descendents of Esau) and Ammon. They, along with Moab (Amos 2:1-3) are located to the Southeast of Israel. The Edomites acted treacherously against their neighbors and lacked compassion (Amos 1:11). The Ammonites actually killed pregnant women to reduce populations (the focus being on the taking of innocent life) for the purpose of geographical expansion and increasing economic holdings. (i.e. they killed children and women for convenience and personal gain.) (Amos 1:13).

This opening scene of judgements will be continued tomorrow... but a pattern has emerged and is helpful to understand. If Amos is addressing Israel based on God's covenant relationship with them, then all of the focus of judgment against the nations must be for their benefit. Notice that the judgments were against their neighbors to the northeast, southwest, northwest and southeast. Tomorrow we will notice that the judgment continues to their south and ultimately addresses them. This is a unique feature among prophetic literature. Most interpreters believe that this is like a great sermon. They believe that Amos was gaining the approval of the people and drawing them in by announcing "their God's judgment" against their enemies. As they are drawn in and give approval to the message, God will focus judgment on them for their actions...since judgment alwasy begins with God's people.

Sometimes it is easy for us to see the sins of others and not our own. We will deal more with it later, but Israel assumed that since they were involved in religious activity and experiencing economic prosperity...they were blessed of God. However, they too were transgressing God's plan and purpose...a sin demanding a righteous response from a Holy God.

Proverbs 25:26 is the takeaway today. We are called to stand for those things that are of utmost importance...things of righteousness. To not do so is the be like a polluted or dirty source of water. We move from being a welcomed and needed source of refreshment to being an empty promise and an object to be marked and avoided.

Take Two: Hebrews 13, Proverbs 24

2009-03-24T06:01:00.004-05:00

This concluding chapter of Hebrews moves quickly through a couple of matters and then ends with a benediction.

Heb 13:1 is an encouragement to continue in the love/devotion to the Christian community (brethren). In many ways, the community was a closer connection than even one's own natural family. This is a statement that reminds the reader to not grow weary, but to support/ encourage/love one another.

Heb 13:2 Be hospitable to strangers. This was a cultural norm for the readers but also was an exhortation to not shrink back from it. A temptation to withdraw hospitality might be normal for those who were experiencing difficulty in their circumstances (financial/persecution) etc.

Heb 13:3 Remember those in prison. This is not a general exhortation to remember prisoners who were incarcerated (which one may do). It is a reminder to not forget about those who were imprisoned for their faith and had been removed from the Christian community.

Heb 13:4 Honor the institution of marriage and do not dishonor ones spouse or defile the marriage bed. Honoring ones mate and protecting oneself from sexual immorality is a necessity for a healthy and happy marriage.

Heb 13:5-6, Trust in God, not in possessions. Do not covet and hold onto your possessions and neglect the needs around you within the community and the needs of the "Mission."

Heb 13:7 Honor those who have taught you the Word and led you. Imitate their lives so that you will experience the outcome as they have. (By the way...some of those leaders are in prison for their faith. Imitate that.) Heb 13:17 also speaks of submitting to the authority of these leaders since the leaders are watching over and protecting the people...and will give an account to God for how they have led.

Heb 13:8-9. Because Christ is unchangable...do not be carried away by the "new" idea some guy wrote about. Be strengthened by the Orthodox beliefs. Those of Salvation by grace...not in some action that brings a warm and fuzzy feeling.

Heb 13:10-16. Do not be caught up in offering sacrifices to please God. Those who worship at "that" altar have no part in the genuine worship of God. Rather, bring the sacrifice of giving thanks continually and praise to God. If you become a "reproach" to those around you...remember that Jesus was a reproach.

Heb 13:18-19. The writer, who was well known to the audience even though he is not identified here in this letter...asks the church to pray for him...since he wanted to do the "right thing" in the midst of difficulty.

Heb 13:20-25 is a closing benediction. Praise be to God!

Proverbs 24:27 is the takeaway today. Wisdom dictates that there is a "best" order in which to do things. It would be strange to meet a man who was a farmer who had a nice home and no fields. In fact, if one were insightful...much of the financial crisis in our country today is caused by violating this principle. The magnitude of "credit" and the lack of "equity" is an outcome of building ones house before one builds the source which will provide for the house. Another way of speaking of this is "delayed gratification." While it is not original to him, Don teaches in his financial principles class at our church that we should "live today like others won't, so we can live tomorrow like others can't." This is another way of articulating this principle. Who knows what the future holds? Only God. We should do what is necessary now so we can used of God greatly in the days ahead.

Tomorrow we move back tot he OT book of Amos! See you there!

Grace,

A desire for "Christian Community"...without the "Christian"

2009-03-23T10:43:00.003-05:00

A special Thank you to Dr. Thom Rainer, President of Likeway Publishing for providing the link to this article in the NY Times.

In this article, "humanists" seem to desire congregationalizing...or experiencing the value of community. I found the article to be "thought-provoking" since it gives insight into some of the "felt needs" of our culture.

Even those who reject the existence of a great moral lawgiver (God), see an innate desire to contribute to the whole. Even a philosophy built on strong individualistic tenets, sees the need and benefit of experiencing "community."

Hopefully you will enjoy the read as you seek to get a glimpse of the mindset of some who are different than you. Love for you to drop back by after reading the article and share your thoughts.

Grace.

Take Two: Hebrews 12, Proverbs 23

2009-03-23T06:14:00.002-05:00

Hebrews 12 begins with the conclusion/point of the list of saints that was given in chapter 11. Since we have so many witnesses/examples to look to, let us also do these things: Lay aside sin and the things that hold us back or trip us up; run the race before us with endurance; fix our eyes on Jesus...our example...considering how He lived so that we won't become discouraged and quit (Heb 12:1-3).

Heb 12:4-11 deals with the subject/question of discipline. The writer answers the unasked question about why God allows (causes) the difficulties the people are enduring. The answer is that God disciplines those whome He loves. God corrects His own children.

Heb 12:12-17 is a word of encouragement to address those things that need to be. Bind up what is weak, clear one's path of obstacles, pursue a peaceful existence, pursue sanctification (the process of godliness), and guard oneself against ungodly attitudes toward others.

Heb 12:18-24 speaks of the contrast between the God who was feared and the God who gave His own life to satisfy (make propitiation for) the wrath of God against sin.

All of these statements of address are necessary for consideration since...there is a day coming when God will judge (Heb 12:25-29) all things and that which is not prepared will be destroyed. In light of that...knowing that judgment will come...those who know and love God should serve Him joyfully...in full realization that they can never be shaken...because of the sufficiency of Christ.

Proverbs 23:9 is the takeaway today. This is a difficult balance for me to consider. On one hand, I am called to proclaim truth to those where God has opened the door to hear it. On the other hand...I am told of the foolishness of proclamation to the foolish one. How are the two reconciled?
A "fool" or "foolish one" is a person who is unteachable. It does not mean one who does foolish things per se, since we all do those. It is one who refuses to stop doing foolish things. I think of the people I have gone back to time and again to try to "convince them" to see God and become Christ-followers. Often times, my words were wasted and the conversation digressed to a debate over extraneous information. It is those conversations...with those who show no teachability that God refers to here in Proverbs. God must do a great work of preparation in their hearts before they will be able to receive His wisdom...from you, me, or from anyone else.

Take Two: Hebrews 11, Proverbs 22

2009-03-22T06:45:00.004-05:00

Hebrews 11 is pretty familiar territory for some...so it is easy to "gloss over" if we are not careful. (I catch myself doing that with familiar passages. I assume I know and have understood them...so I speed read them.) There really is no part of Scripture though that is so familar that we can afford to just "gloss over." Even things we can recite from memory...sometimes produce new thoughts when we read the words slowly and methodically.

The chapter continues the thought that has been the them all along. Because we have the "Perfect" (Jesus), then we can never go back to the "imperfect" (The Law...or any other inferior system for relating to God.)

So how do we know if we have "Jesus"? After all, shouldn't it get easier? And, if we do have Him...what do we do when things are tough?

The call has been and continues to be that we exercise faith in God. What is "faith." It is the confident belief in that which is not yet measurable (Heb 11:1). We have faith in God, not yet having SEEN Him. We have faith in heaven, not yet having BEEN there. If we "confidently believe" in something...we act accordingly. This is the point that jumps off of the page in Hebrews 11. Abel offered a better sacrifice by faith (Heb 11:4). Enoch lived his life pleasing God (Heb 12:5). Abraham obeyed God (Heb 11:8-12). All of these died without ever seeing God face to face...yet they lived as though they would (Heb 12:13). This living according to their faith made it evident that they were trusting in a world still unseen...and God was not ashamed to call them His children (Heb 11:14-16).

With each of those saints that followed, the same is true. They believed...and acted by faith. Sometimes...their faith was rewarded in the short-term with observable victory (Heb 11:32-35); at other times, it resulted only in long-term victory (Heb 11:35-38). In both cases, they acted by faith and in both cases they received a victory. Yet...as the writer is about to point out...none of them ever even saw the Messiah...yet they demonstrated perfect/perfected faith.

By a man's actions...we can know what He believes in his heart. Some people are "into Jesus" for the short-term benefit. As long as they have health and prosperity...they are good with Christianity. Others are "into Jesus" but only on their terms. Those who are truly Christ-followers...choose Him over all things...whether they experience blessing or hardship...knowing that they have a hope waiting-- that exceeds every expectation.

Proverbs 22:15 is the takeaway today. This is a verse I have read many times and have even quoted to folks along the way. As I read it this morning...I was impressed that God disciplines us for the same reason and with the same goal. When we receive the discipline of God...it is because...at our core...we are unwise/foolish (rebellious against God). We will not relinquish this attitude/disposition easily. In fact, it is bound up within us. We will not choose to forsake it...until it is so costly/painful to keep it...that we choose to let it go. Therefore, God disciplines us.

Discipline is good. It reminds us of the love of God which is displayed in His desire to see us live free from that which binds us up.

Grace,

Take Two: Hebrews 10, Proverbs 21

2009-03-21T07:10:00.002-05:00

Hebrews 10 draws some conclusions for us and provides a warning based on those conclusions. The writer has built a great argument for why one can never go back to an insufficient system after he has experienced the perfect redemption in Christ.

Keeping the Law was never intended to be a sufficient satisfaction of God's judgment against sin. One of the obvious reasons why...is that no one can keep the Law. If so, there would never be a sense of consciousness/guilt for our sins. That is the point of Heb 10:1-10. Christ nullified the "copy/shadow" system (the Law) as the way to relate to God when He fulfilled it. He took away the "Law System" in order to establish the New Covenant (Heb 10:10).

Christ demonstrated the sufficiency/superiority of His sacrifice when He sat down at the right hand of God. Every other priest stands continually in the temple (no chairs) because his work is never done (Heb 10:11-18). Since Christ's sacrifice is eternally sufficient, there are no more sacrifices to make, so He sat down ( a picture of the finished work).

Here is the conclusion: Since we have a confident approach to God through Christ's sacrifice (Heb 10:19-20), and a Great High Priest (Heb 10:21), Let's act on them and draw near with "CONVINCED HEARTS" and STAND FIRM in our conviction and confession...and encourage one another to STAY THE COURSE (Heb 10:22-25). To do otherwise...to turn back...is to declare by our actions that Christ's sacrifice is INSUFFICIENT and lacks POWER...a sin we can be sure God will punish (Heb 10:26-31).

The writer is not concerned that the readers are going to give up their salvation and be judged by God. This is not the issue. He is trying to motivate them (stimulate them to good works) to stand firm. This is very clear in how the writer closes out the chapter. In Heb 10:32-39, the writer reminds his audience that they had already experienced salvation, that it had cost them, and that they did it anyway. He knew this...because they were compasionate toward those in society in need (a sure sign of Christ's heart). So, they should not turn back or shrink back from their faith which saves.

So, who knew that "salvation" (the ongoing aspects of salvation/ sanctification) was so much work? It would seem foolish to think that salvation is about saying a prayer and being baptized. These are only the first steps of a lifelong journey...which consists of challenges, trials, distresses...as well as joy, peace, and hope. EARNING Favor with God (Justification) requires no effort...only a decision to trust Him; however, EXPERIENCING God requires great effort in the battle between the flesh and the spirit. You cannot walk away from God and experience the benefits of relationship. The life of a Christian is such that we must continue day by day to choose Him and pursue Him with great effort.

Proverbs 21: 3 is the takeaway today. It is not that God does not desire sacrifice. He does. He prescribed this as a means of worship. However, sacrifice (religious worship) alone is insufficient. Real sacrifice (religious worship) ALWAYS involves living out ones religion in everyday life.

Take Two: Hebrews 9, Proverbs 20

2009-03-20T05:55:00.003-05:00

The writer continues the discussion on why the New Covenant is superior to the Old Covenant. He begins by pointing out that there were two parts to the tabernacle/temple structure (Heb 9:1-5). There was the Holy place where the priests ministered...and there was the Holy of holies where only the High Priest ministered. This is analogous to the fact that the priests ministered under the Old Covenant while only Jesus ministered under the New Covenant.

This is necessary, as the writer's argument goes, since the Old Covenant could not cleanse a person's conscience (Heb 9:9). The ongoing requirement to offer again sacrifices at the temple reminded the worshipper that their "work" was never done under the Old Covenant.

Heb 9:11-14 then shifts and explains that Christ, however, finished the work and made the "perfect/cleansed" conscience possible. Because of this, there would never be a reason to return from the "perfect" to the imperfection of the Old Covenant (Heb 9:15-22). This new and perfect covenant is made possible as with all covenants...through the shedding of blood. Under both the Old and New Covenants, blood must be shed as an offering for forgiveness of sin (Heb 9:22), however there is a difference. Under the Old Covenant, there was the need for continual/ ongoiing sacrifices to be made in the temple/tabernacle. It is not that the blood sacrifices ACTUALLY saved. To the contrary...the act of sacrificing by faith was the response to God that saved. The sacrifices, like the temple/tabernacle were types/copies the "perfect" which was to come.

(CHEW ON THAT FOR A MINUTE)

The obedient response to God, by faith, in dealing with sin as God required was the act that unlocked Salvation. That is a major theological point and is exactly what the writer wants the reader to grasp. Obedience to the Old Covenant was fine under the Old Covenant...but once the New Covenant comes, it is just disobedience. As one person said, "Delayed Obedience is simply Disobedience." Trust in disobedient worship is no different as far as its "efficacy" (ability to accomplish the work) than trusting in some more flagrantly sinful philosophy. Once one knows what to do...substituting anything for obedience is an "in your face" afront to God!

Let's apply that:

God wants me to serve Him as a missionary but I choose to teach Sunday School instead. It is SIN.
God wants me to teach my children to love Him, but I feel inept and send them to Christian School or Bible College instead...it is SIN.
God wants me to tithe my income, but I give it to save starving whales off the coast of Alaska (or buy a nicer car, take a family vacation, or put extra gas in the fuel tank)...it is SIN.
Anything...no matter how good it is, that is not what God has prescribed for us to do...is sin.

There is only one righteous response to God...it is the response that mirrors Jesus' conduct. We are to give our lives to God and live as He would have us to...regardless of our view/perception/ or beliefs on the subject. Only then can our conscience be perfected and God be truly glorified and enjoyed.

Proverbs 20:4 is the takeaway today. This hit me for two reasons. We live in a culture today when a person's "desires" are accentuated to the point that we are somewhat hedonistic (focused on personal pleasure) above all else. We say to a person who wants to work at McDonalds and can't feed their family..."it is ok. Do what you think is best/want to do." This is not so. There is a level of responsibility that is required of every person. To shirk that responsibility...is to find oneself in "need" and simply suffer by going without (often causing the suffering of others under one's care as well). There is no obligation on the part of those who "have"...to prop up those who "have not"...by choice or dereliction of duty.

Judicial nominees..."judgment" or "agenda?"

2009-03-19T06:36:00.004-05:00

On March 17, 2009 President Obama announced a nominee to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. According to an article in the Baptist Press, the nominee- Hon. David Hamilton, has ruled previously on matters like "prayer in Jesus' Name."

The Seventh Circuit also reversed a 2005 opinion by Hamilton in which he
ruled prayers in the Indiana legislature could not use "Christ's name or
title or any other denominational appeal." Hamilton sided with the ACLU's
Indiana branch, which filed the lawsuit.

"All [ministers] are free to pray as they wish in their own houses of worship or in other settings," Hamilton wrote. "The individuals do not have a First Amendment
right, however, to use an official platform like the Speaker's podium at the
opening of a House session to express their own religious faiths."

As I read this, I was reminded of the tired analogy of the "frog in the kettle." Place a frog in boiling water and he will jump out. Place him in cold water and turn up the heat gradually...you can boil him alive.

There is a subtle but real effort in our culture to remove beliefs that serve as distinctions. For an evangelical, to pray in a Name other than Jesus is an afront on the conscience...and is a fundamental departure from the closely held beliefs of our Founding Fathers that the government would not be in the business of regulating religious activity. If it were a Jewish Rabbi or a Muslim Imam who was praying, I do not believe the government should regulate the content of their prayers either. To assert though that a religious leader should subscribe to the philosophical leanings of the government...like an employee to an employer...is to fundamentally undermine the principle of Separating Church and State.

Any nominee to an appointment in the Federal Judiciary should respect the founding tenets of our nation and not show a repeated and proven track record of judicial activism... especially when "said activism" seeks to impose views commensurate with a radical departure from those founding tenets. To nominate such a person speaks to the judgment and/or agenda of
the one nominating.

Take Two: Hebrews 8, Proverbs 19

2009-03-19T05:41:00.004-05:00

Hebrews 8 picks up on the discussion and assumes the point made in Chapter 7. Jesus Christ is different and even "superior" to the priests of the Jewish Law. Therefore, His "system" (to use a term very loosely to relate to the New Covenant) is different and superior to the old "system/ covenant. Once a person has the better covenant, it is nonsensical for them to consider returning to the inferior.

Heb 8:1-6 makes this point. Once we determine that Christ is superior, that He is our High Priest, that He is in heaven in the position of authority (right hand of the throne), then all lesser "priests" are revealed to be insufficient. They serve a "copy" and not the better. Growing up, my parents always provided...but sometimes it was more creatively done than at other times. I joke sometimes that I did not know that meatloaf was intended to contain meat until I got married and someone else made it. Growing up...two pounds of hamburger made a five pound meatloaf. If you add enough bread, milk, and eggs...you can do anything. Growing up, meatloaf was one of my favorite dishes. After I got married and discovered that many people use 1 pound of meat to make a one pound meatloaf, I was perplexed. I thought Jodi was doing it wrong. Then I tasted it. It tasted like meat! Now...it is pretty difficult to enjoy the old meat/bread loaf with the same zeal as before. I have had the "real," so the copy is less satisfying. SAME CONCEPT the writer of Hebrews is speaking of.

Heb 8:7 makes the next point. Since there is a New Covenant, it is clear that the Old Covenant was imperfect. If the first covenant was sufficient and perfect, then there would be no need for a second, (unless God was creating a variety of ways for us to relate to Him.) This case is made clear from the OT citations in Heb 8:8-12. Heb 8:13 then concludes that the very presence of the "New Covenant" indicates the obsolescence of the "Old Covenant." As before, the point is not theological per se; rather, the point is pastoral. The writer is encouraging the readers to dismiss the idea of returning to the Old Covenant since they now have the New.

Proverbs 19:2 is the takeaway. When we are called on to "hurry" to decide a matter, it usually means that we are expected to make a decision without all of the available "knowledge." This usually leads to a decision that is less wise than one would make if taking the appropriate amount of time. I am mindful of the current news broadcasts where people are "up in arms" over the conduct of leaders of companies that the government bailed out. Some took big bonuses, in accordance with the agreement and terms of the bailout. As such, there is no recourse. When the Bill was up for deliberation, those who wanted to examine it further were chastised and told that their lack of action would lead to demise. Now...it seems more "knowledge" and a more thoughful approach would have led to a better decision. I guess the urgent pleas of some leaders in the face of "imminent danger of economic collapse" caused a panicked response and a poorly executed approach. Once again, God demonstrates His Wisdom before all the World!

Take Two: Hebrews 7, Proverbs 18

2009-03-18T05:47:00.003-05:00

The writer resumes his argument on the uniqueness and superiority of Christ...drawing an analogy to Melchizedek. We see this shift begin in Heb 6:20 where the writer tells us that Jesus is a High Priest according to (just as) the order of Melchizedek. Follow his argument.

Jewish Law teaches that the Priests are from the Levite Tribe.
They become Levites by physical birth.
All Levites point backward to the Patriarch Abraham, since they are his descendents.

So, if all priests come from Abraham, then how is it that Abraham acknowledged and honored the priest Melchizedek?

(Understand that the author is not denouncing the priesthood of the Levites. He is not even arguing that Melchizedek is someone great. In his mind, Melchizedek is a great example, ALREADY ACCEPTED by his readers, of a priest who was not a Levite...so, he is a perfect "TYPE" to be compared with Christ.)

Heb 7:1-2 describes Melchizedek as "priest of the Most High God," and the king of Salem (peace). His name means "king of Righteousness" (from the Hebrew- Melek {King}, Chizdek {Righteousness}). So, you have a man who is the king of righteousness and peace, who is a priest of the Most High God who is not a Levite. In fact, nothing is known of Melchizedek's birth, death, or ancestry (Heb 6:3).

All of the readers would have already acepted that Melchizedek was a priest and worthy of honor since "Father Abraham" saw fit to give him a "tithe" of all of the spoils (Heb 7:2).

Now follow the argument: Since Abraham honored Melchizedek, it was implied that Melchizedek was (at least in this role) superior to Abraham. Since all of the Levite priests (including the High Priest) are descendents of Abraham...then by inference, Melchizedek was superior to them as well...and this without being a Jew (Heb 7:4-7).

Heb 7:11-13 then "draws the net." If the Levitical priesthood was the "way" to go and Jewish Law adherence was the key, why was there another priest named Melchizedek? (The writer's goal was to get his audience "nodding" along with him...so he could draw the parallel with Jesus.)

Heb 7:14-28 shows that Jesus was not a Levite, but like Melchizedek, He is superior to the levitical priesthood. This is evident since:

God declared him a priest forever (Heb 7:17)
Jesus is a Priest, not on the basis of physical descent, but based on the power of His life (Heb 7:16)
God swore that Jesus' Priesthood would not change or expire (Heb 7:21)
There were many Levites (since they died and changed) but there was only one Jesus since He was a priest forever (Heb 7:23-24)
Other priests offered sacrifices daily for their sins and the sins of the people, but Jesus offered Himself ONCE for ALL (Heb 7:26-27).

Bear in mind, the writer wants the reader to grasp the fact that once they have the "perfect," they cannot return to the "imperfect." It will not be sufficient. His goal is not to win a theological argument, but to encourage them to stand firm in the faith they confessed toward Christ.

Sometimes, we all need encouragement. We want to walk away or become apathetic toward things of God. When we look at who Christ is, it should stir us to new or renewed passion for Him! He is worthy of our passionate pursuit.

Proverbs 18:11 is the takeaway. Every person has a point of security. In his mind (imagination), he believes that his security is sufficient to protect him. In this proverb, the security is the "rich man's wealth." It is security to him because he possesses it. He becomes prideful and maybe even boastful in his own security. However, his security is not sufficient if it is found outside of God. God alone secures. All else will be brought down, because God desires that we trust in Him alone as our strong tower (Prov 18:10).

Grace,

Take Two: Hebrews 6, Proverbs 17

2009-03-17T06:12:00.004-05:00

Hebrews 6 is one of those chapters that causes theologians to get fired up. The subject is "falling away" or "apostasy," and the writer says to those who do it...there is no hope of ever coming back (Heb 6:6). Depending on your theological bent...you may read into the chapter different than someone else.

If you come from a position that hold to a very hight view of God's Sovereignty (i.e. Calvinism, Reformed tradition, etc.) you likely say that the writer means that those who "seem" to fall away...were never really part of God's family. If you hold a position which holds a higher view of "man's freewill" (i.e. Arminianism, Methodist, freewill ____, sone Pentecostal) you likely say that the writer means that those who were Christians can "fall away" from their Salvation...and for those who do (and don't turn back before they get all the way away)...you can never be restored.

There are a number of other stripes along the way...variations of these two extremes. I personally hold to a balanced view of these two which affirms both: God is Sovereign (in absolute control of everything) and man is responsible (must choose to act in light of God's Sovereignty). My view doesn't fit "neatly" into either of these two systems...but it is the correct position so everyone else needs to change (Grin). Seriously though...the position I hold sees a divine tension between God's control and man's responsibility. It may not fit into someone's idea of "logic," but as my Systematic Theology Professor said in Seminary..."my theology is somewhat like the furniture in my house. It may not all match, but it suits me just fine."

Back to the issue. Depending on your theological presuppositions, you may have interpreted this concept in the chapter differently. There are 5 or 6 dominant explanations as to what is meant by the passage. My favorite comes from Dr. Thomas Schreiner, professor at Southern Seminary. He sees the passage as a divine warning. The writer warns the audience...that being saved...and walking away...makes it impossible for them to come back. Why? Because to do so would be to (in essence) declare that Jesus was insufficient...because to come back is like needing to re-crucify Him (Heb 6:4-6). The writer is expecting that the reader will say: "Absolutely not! I cannot crucify my Lord again!" This would be the desired outcome of the warning.

It does not appear that the idea in the mind of the writer is ever that these folks were in danger of losing their salvation. he is preaching to them to stand firm and never turn back. Heb 6:9 says that the writer is CONVINCED of better things for them (than falling away). He is also convinced that the nature of Salvation is not one of "losing it."

God made a promise to Abraham and kept it. Abraham believed God and persevered. Abraham received from God what was promised (Heb 6:14-15). The writer points to this example as an encouragement and challenge to the reader...that God made them a promise (salvation) and if they will persevere, they too will receive it.

Unfortunately...passages like this have become, through the years, "hobby horses" for guys to ride while making their theological cases. What is at issue is not some obscure point. The writer wants the readers to stand firm. His point is not academic...it is pastoral.

One final thing: the writer is encouraging the audience to consider this (and other) difficult concepts as a means of strengthening their faith and understanding of God (Heb 6:1-3). Sometimes...we meet Christians who are discouraged or who live outside of the abundant life God provides (John 10:10). In many ways, the reason for this is because they have never moved on to consider the weightier matters of God's character. They have never left the elementary principles of God...so they have only an elementary level of trust and confidence. But (as the writer says here), I am convinced of better things concerning you...

Proverbs 17:14 is the takeaway today. Disunity...strife...struggle...contention...Once the train starts down the track, it is dificult to stop. How does one avoid strife? Abandon it early. Otherwise, it is like letting out water (yes this is humanly speaking for the process of ridding the body of fluids)...once it starts, it is difficult to stop. Once a quarrel begins...it is nearly impossible to just abandon it. So...abandon the quarrel before it starts.

Grace,

A great post on balancing the gospel and social ministry

2009-03-16T07:10:00.004-05:00

Check out this post by Pastor JD Greear on balancing gospel proclamation and social activism. Read his post...then comment back here. I would love to hear your thoughts...

Grace,

Take Two: Hebrews 5, Proverbs 16

2009-03-16T06:23:00.003-05:00

The uniqueness of Christ as our High Priest is the subject of this chapter. The High Priest is the one who entered into the presence of God on behalf of the people to offer sacrifices for sin. Heb 5:2 tells us that the High Priest can easily relate to and deal gently with the people who sin, since he himself is a sinner.

Heb 5:3 reminds us though, that since the High Priest is a man, before he could offer sacrifices for others, he had to first offer a sacrifice for his own sin.

Heb 5:4 gives the third characteristic that the writer wishes to point out. No High Priest volunteered for the job, but was "called" (selected) by God.

Jesus is the great High Priest. He became as we are in every way (a man) and felt the draw of the flesh toward rebellion against God. However, He did not yield to the draw/temptation to sin. This explains for us what Jesus "learned" in His humanity and how He was "perfected" (Heb 5:8-10). Since Jesus never sinned, He did not need to offer a sacrifice on His own behalf before God. In this way He is unique. He gave Himself as the one sacrifice for all mankind. Also, like the High Priest in the reader's minds, Jesus was called/selected by God for this mission/assignment.

In Heb 5:11-13, the writer tells his audience that they have become "dull of hearing," when it comes to these issues. He charges them that they have become satisfied with the elementary principles of Christianity (Jesus loves me, I am a sinner, Jesus died on the cross for me, etc), and have not developed/moved beyond this point to see the bigger picture.

One of the things I have learned (especially in the last few years) is that everyone has an idea of what it takes to "reach people." Many different ideas exist...but my experience has shown that two things are really necessary. We must engage people where they are, and we must be able to give a real answer to questions people have. As I understand the Bible, Jesus modeled this type of ministry. He met people at their point of need. This is not a geographical location but an emotional/spiritual one. He also answered their questions and responded to their misunderstandings. You and I can do the same. To be good at it, we must become good at it. (Deep huh?) If I wanted to be a good salesman, I would study how. If I wanted to become a good gardener, I would study how. If I wanted to become good at math/accounting/banking, I would study how. What separates people at this point is the desire and passion to do it.

God has allowed me to speak truth into a lot of lives in my ministry. I have led many people to Christ and still counsel many people on how to "fix" issues. My approach is pretty simple. Find where a person is, point them to where God would have them be...and encourage them to go there. I have taken the time to learn the answers to their questions. I have taken the time to learn how to communicate those answers. I have taken the time to build a relationship with them...so that they would be willing to ask. Nothing more.

There is nothing about what God has allowed me to do that is different than what God desires for all of us. Are you willing to become good at what God wants you to do?

Proverbs 16:21 is the takeaway today. This struck me because it spoke of both CONTENT (wisdom of heart) and CONTEXT (sweetness of speech). Both are necessary for maximum impact. Content...without considering context is hardly effective. Context...without content feels good but doesn't challenge or change anything. Both are needed. Say what needs to be said...but say it kindly and considerately. Doing so, will change the world.

Take Two: Hebrews 4, Proverbs 15

2009-03-15T06:49:00.003-05:00

Chapter 4 presents the "flip side" of the argument just presented. The writer in Heb 3:12-19 spoke of those who did not enter into the Promised land due to their unbelief. In Chapter 4, the writer explains that the "promised land" is not a geography as much as it is a "state of being"/rest in the presence of God.

How does one get there? By believing God...trusting in Him and following Him by faith. The window of opportunity to believe God is not an unlimited "window." (Heb 4:1-2). The writer tells us to fear if we have not yet entered in while there is still time. We enter into this "rest" of God by responding to the Word of God with faithful obedience.

It is not that God continues to work to provide "rest." Heb 4:3-7 indicates that the "rest" God speaks of was completed at the foundation of the world. PEACE WITH GOD then is not dependent on a particular religious system, but in a faithful and accurate response toward God who has revealed Himself. In other words, Judaism is not the key. Baptist is not the key. Being part of a religious system will not accomplish the task. Believing God and acting according to His Word BY FAITH is the only way. We are not waiting on the "new" "right" way to approach God. We are looking for how God said to approach Him.

The argument now shifts to speak directly to those who thought that the "rest" or inheritance of God was a place. The writer tells us (Heb 4:8-10) that if the land was the "rest" that God had intended...then it would not have been spoken of again after Joshua. The "rest" was a ceasing from working to appease God...and receiving BY FAITH that which God had already accomplished and rested from.

Heb 4:11-16 tells us to be diligent to stay true to this "rest." The Word of God is sufficient to guide us. It is the (primary) instrument that the Holy Spirit uses to convict us and point to our need for God's mercy.
This mercy comes from our great High Priest who has been made like us in every way and can sympathize with us in every way as a result. So, (therefore) let us draw near to Him with confidence.

Some folks say that they are unable to "rest" in their relationship with God. They are uncertain that God will accept them. They think that God won't understand. While this may seem logical in some regards, it is certainly not biblical. The Bible (God's Word to us) is the ultimate authority on who God is, and How God acts/responds. Even if it seems illogical, God says that we can (and should) be confident in our approaching the throne because Jesus knows and cares.

Proverbs 15:2 is the takeaway today. How one speaks truth affects how another receives it. Some would say that "truth" is "truth," so we should not concern oursleves with how we "deliver" it. This is not so. Wise men choose their words, consider their context, and speak a timely Word. Fools...say what is on their mind. I think of those guys who yell at people in cars as they pass by. They tell them to turn to God or "burn in hell." They believe RIGHTFULLY that this is truth...but the method of delivery becomes a stumbling block. People do not hear the message and receive the knowledge because the deliverer is a fool. The truth never changes. Without God, the only possible outcome is separation from God. However, wise men know how to communicate this in such a manner as to encourage people to trust this God who acts with justice and mercy.

Grace,

Take Two: Hebrews 3, Proverbs 14

2009-03-14T08:32:00.003-05:00

Chapter three introduces us to a difficult theological concept...that of "falling away." It will be a recurring theme in this book, since one of the primary goals of this book is to encourage Jewish believers to stand firm in the faith that is in Christ, rather than return to the empty practice of Judaism.

At a very high level, we can see that the author desires for us recognize Jesus (and the dispensation of Grace) as superior in every way to that of Moses (the dispensation of the Law) (Heb 3:1-6). The point being made is not that Moses was unfaithful; rather, it is that Moses was a faithful builder of the "house" where Jesus is Lord (Heb 3:5-6). Ultimately, as the writer points out, God is the builder of the "house"...the system through which we relate to God. Moses was faithful in all he had to do and Jesus was faithful in all He did.

There is a subtle implication here...the writer wants it to be clear that as those who were in Moses day were required to be faithful to receive the inheritance (Heb 3:12-18), his readers are required to be faithful to Jesus in whose era they live. To walk away...is to forsake the benefit of relationship.

Now the question always comes up..."can I forsake my belief and fall away?" The Reformers thought not. I concur. Those that "fall away" were never really God's people to begin with. However, that does not change the responsibility to not only be faithful (for us), but to encourage others to be faithful (Heb 3:13-14), since to forsake the faith...is to demonstrate an evil and unbelieving heart.

Some would protest that this is unnecessary...stating that if we are at all responsible for our own "security" as recipients of God's grace...then salvation is "works based." This is not true...and I will unpack that more as we get deeper into the book.

Here is the big takeaway today...for me. We are told to "take care" not to "fall away" and to encourage other so they do not "fall away." This requires some intentionality on our part to guard ourselves and to be watchguards over others. We should take that seriously. The rest...we leave to the justice and mercy of God.

Proverbs 14:6 is the takeaway today. The scoffer (one who is unteachable and resistant to wisdom...who scoffs at it) can never discover wisdom. The reason is...he cannot see the forest for the trees. He is the one who argues, questions, and rebels against God's wisdom. To the one who "applies" knowledge (has understanding)...knowledge comes easy. God is not complicated. He is complex...but not complicated. His was are not necessarily easy...but they are simple. Those that miss God...tend to be those who "overcook the grits."

Take Two: Hebrews 2, Proverbs 13

2009-03-13T05:59:00.002-05:00

Hopefully you are seeing from the pace of this book...that you can't get behind. You also can't "speed read" through this book. The chapters of Hebrews are so "full" of theology and explanation...that you have to slow down and be very deliberate...or you will miss it. If you try to just "burn through it," to check off the list...you will likely become frustrated.

If you have ever asked, "Why did God do 'Salvation' the way He did," or "why the cross"...then this chapter is for you.

Heb 2:1-4 gives the argument from the writer of why we should pay close attention. "For this reason" points back to the previous verses. Since the ministry of the angels was both for the service of God and for the benefit of the saints...then (Heb 2:1-2) we must pay much closer attention to the account (of God's Salvation through Jesus alone) we have heard, SO THAT we do not drift away from it. Because, if what the angels said proved to be true, how can we not expect what Jesus said to be true? [Good logical application of the point the writer is making.]

Heb 2:5-8 gives the next logical connection. We trust in the angel's message...but God did not put angels in charge of the world. He gave this to Jesus. In placing the world in subjection to Jesus, God left nothing that was not subjected to Jesus.

Now you may ask, "Why did he say that?" He notes that Jesus is superior to angels...because some would have suggested that...since Jesus was crucified...then he was really lesser than the angels. They would say that angels were "celestial" beings...and Jesus was human. Angels never died...and Jesus did. Angels are powerful ministering spirits...and Jesus was killed. The "champions" of the angels are simply wondering the same thing many have asked through the years. Why does God save the world through the crucifixion of His Son? For some, they can never get over the stumbling block of the cross (Gal 5:11).

The writer concedes that Jesus was made lower than the angels (for a little while/ a season) SO THAT He would taste death for all of us (Heb 2:9). The cross is not a plan that just got out of hand...it was purposeful.

The cross is FITTING (Heb 2:10) because God brought about a substitutionary sacrifice which both SAVED all those who would believe AND SATISFIED the demands of His own holiness in judging sin for what it is in the economy of God. Through the HUMILITY (theological concept) of Christ becoming a man (not as a man...or like a man...but a man), he became perfected as the sacrifice of God by being a fitting substitution in every way. He became as man is...and became their brother. (Heb 2:10-11). The writer then supports his thesis from OT Scripture. It was exactly as God designed that Jesus would be "flesh and blood" as His brethren (humans) are...so as to defeat (render powerless) the enemy (Heb 2:14-16).

Heb 2:17-18 gives the final logical connection. THEREFORE Jesus had to be a man in every way SO THAT He could experientially be the intercessor/high priest who would make atonement for our sin.

In the media recently, they have spoken of a financial "perfect storm." They mean from this that many different things converged in a particular way and caused an outcome (perfect storm) which was impossible except for the convergence of the different factors. In the Salvation narrative...God brought together His justice, His judgment, His substitutionary sacrifice, and His grace. We see an enemy who had gained power through the Law, man who was sinful, His own Son who was perfect, and a cross which was shameful. In the Salvation narrative, God did what only He could do...in a perfect storm...He satisfied His judgment and showed His grace. We demonstrated that He is both JUST and the JUSTIFIER in a way that no other one or no other thing could ever accomplish.

If God did do this and can do this to save all of humanity from sin...isn't He worthy of our loyalty and allegience? Can't we trust Him with the other aspects of our lives?

Proverbs 13:18 is the takeaway today. Sometimes we can look at trouble or trials that come our way as "attacks of the enemy." Sometimes they are. Sometimes though...they are just the outworking of consequences for decisions/actions we have taken. A person who overextends himself with bills and credit...may find himself suffering and lacking. This is not an enemy attack...it is a lack of discipline. What does one do? Listen to the reproof (correction/ instruction) of the wise and be redeemed.

Take Two: Hebrews 1, Proverbs 12

2009-03-12T05:55:00.003-05:00

As we begin Hebrews today, let me preface this by saying that it is one of my favorite books in the NT, and I have spent more time studying Hebrews than any other NT books, except maybe the gospel of Matthew and the pastoral epistles (Timothy and Titus). I find the book to be fascinating for a number of reasons. One of the things you will love about this book is the fact that understanding it will allow you to understand better many of the OT practices and pictures you encounter. Second, you will love the fact that it is structured (in many ways) like a sermon. (OK, that is the part I love!) The writer is making a point and uses a number of OT passages and shows how we should interpret and apply them in developing out theology. Third, the subject matter is pretty deep. We will deal with some of the more debated passages and concepts over the next 13 days together. Now...while I have studied it extensively, I never tire of reading the book. I find it to be encouraging and always find something new...or maybe better said, God still speaks to me from the pages of the book...as if it were the first time reading.

The author is unknown. Many believe this is writen by Paul...but a number of vocal opponents have stated that the internal Greek style is too different from Pauline work for it to be his. I generally think it is a work by Paul...but won't go out of my way to argue about it. I typically just refer to the author as "the writer of Hebrews" and leave it at that.

Best estimation places this as being written around ad 64-68 but certainly before ad 70 when the temple was destroyed. Since Timothy had just been released from prison (Heb 13:23), most conservative scholars date it closer to ad 68. The dating is important...because it gives cause for us to be aware of the intensifying persecution for the Christian community...particularly among those Jews who had become Christians. These guys are the primary audience in this letter.

If you were looking for an overarching theme to tie the book together, it is that Christ (the New Covenant) is far superior to the Law (the Old Covenant). The author will show time and again how the Jewish practices of the religious system were never intended to be "perfect," and as such...make the Old Covenant unfit for a recipient of the New Covenant to ever return to.

Heb 1:1-2 is a foundational introduction to this chapter...and this book. God spoke to His people in various ways and means in the past, IN PART, but now has spoken to us through His Son (who is the supreme revelation who God is). This Son is the sole heir of God (Heb 1:2), is the "exact representation" of God (Heb 1:3) and is the sustainer of all things (Heb 1:3). The Son is different from the angels since He has become (Heb 1:4), not just a Messenger of things about God...but One who has become much better than they.

To say that the Son is the "exact representation" means that He is indistinguishable from God the Father in His essence, character, attributes, power, and honor. The word used in the Greek speaks of an imprinting...not unlike our process of minting coins. Every coin is imprinted in such a way that they are exactly alike. Similarly, Jesus is exactly like God the Father.

Angels spoke of what God was like...the Son is like God in every way...the exact representation. The angels talked about...Jesus was/is.

In Heb 1:5-13, the author now defends his thesis that Jesus is greater than the angels by showing from the reader's own context how the OT revealed this all along. It is not that the writer has developed a new idea that was never before mentioned; rather, he is articulating (by bringing together the different passages) what God has said all along. PRAISE GOD for the sufficiency of the Scriptures and God's power and desire to reveal Himself to us!

Heb 1:14 closes the chapter and points that the angels (ministering spirits) not only served the sender (God) but also served those they were sent to. In other words, by listening to the "angels" which God has sent and spoken of and through...we can see that they have pointed to Jesus all along.

Proverbs 12:18 is the takeaway. The tongue is powerful. I meet folks all the time who say to me..."I am just blunt." Some even spiritualize it and say that they have the "gift of prophesy," but mean by that...that they just "call it like they see it." Words are powerful and while in themselves, they can do neither good or harm...in the hands (or mouth) of a person, they gain their intent of destruction or healing. To be discerning or prophetic in our understanding...does not necessarily mean that we are blunt/prophetic in our deliver. Sure...Jesus said to the Pharisees that they were "whitewashed tombstones and hypocrites;" but, He also dealt gently with others. Gal 6:1-2 says we are to gently restore those who are in error. It takes no tact or communication skill to tell someone they have "stinky" breath....it takes real grace to offer and have them desire to eat a tic-tac.

Take Two: Joel 3, Proverbs 11

2009-03-11T06:12:00.003-05:00

As we wrap up this third chapter, we see the restoration of the Nation of Israel. This is the period of judgment yet to come in human history when God will judge the enemies of His people and will restore His people to their land.

Just to lay my cards on the table: I hold to a pretty literal reading of this text. I do not find a lot of allegory or symbolism. I see no need to substitute the church (spiritual Israel) for Israel (national/ethnic Israel). In fact, it is because of passages like this (and others) that my eschatology (end-times beliefs) is as it is. If you had to put a label on me, you could say that I am "dispensational" in my thinking, however I do not hold to many of the tenets of classical dispensationalism as many define it today. I am also what one would call "pre-tribulation" (pre-trib) and "pre-millenial" (pre-mil) in my thinking. This means, in essence, that I believe that there will be a literal, physical rapture of the church (believers) prior to the start of a literal 7 year period of tribulation...the significance of which this world has never seen. The tribulation will be concluded with the literal return of Christ and the establishment of the literal Millenial Kingdom (1000 year reign)...which I believe this passage refers to.

Now...do you have to understand or agree with everything I just said? No. I lay the comments out there because there are people who get into this type of bible study...and they will try to assign labels to me if I don't take one for myself now. However they have come down on the issues of the "end times" affects how they read this passage. Rather than answer a 40 page blog response as to why I am wrong (in their view), I thought I would preface my comments in this way.

Joel 3:1-2 gives the theme of the "Day of the Lord" again. This is not to say that the judgments of the locust and drought were not also parts of the Day of the Lord...but the attention here is focused on restoring God's people and the judgment is turned against the enemies of God's people. All of the "nations" will be gathered in the "valley of Jehoshaphat." This literally means "Yahweh (God) judges" and, while the location is specifically unknown, is typically understood to be the referring to the location and events of the battle of Armageddon.

God will bring judgment against the nations on behalf of His people. The charges: They scattered the people (exile), took their land, and sold God's people into slavery for their own profit or benefit (Joel 3:3). Specifically, the people of Tyre, Sidon, and the regions of Philistia are mentioned (Joel 3:4), but all of the nations are in view.

A call to arms goes out to the nations to tell them to prepare for war and come fight against God (Joel 3:9-11). A call to God also goes up for the Lord to lead his mighty ones into battle. (I understand this to refer in part to the events of Rev 19:11-21).

The evil of the nations is abundant before God (Joel 3:13) and the time is upon them for the judgment of God (Joel 3:14-16). God speaks, and the nations are destroyed, while His people find refuge. Now all of the world will know of the power of God and no enemies will trample this new Jerusalem which boasts of blessing and provision...and perfect peace (Joel 3:17-21). This peace comes...only because the Lord Himself dwells among His people (Joel 3:21).

Now I shared how I came to my conclusions on what these events refer to. One is entitled to have different views...but each view should be substantiated. If one chooses to discount this interpretation, that's fine...but on what basis? Have you worked out and established all of the parameters of your interpretative position? Having studied some of the best guys out there on many different views of how understand the "end times," I have come to be convinced that my position (while not always the most popular) carries with it the strength of treating the OT as literally as is required of biblical text...while at the same time giving due consideration to the "church age" and the events of our contemporary world.

What is the big picture? It is simply that God is at work bringing His people into fellowship with Him. Our rebellion has separated us from God at times (Is 59:1-2) and He has judged this rebellion. At times we feel the consequence of that judgment when God uses circumstances to draw us back to Him. Further, none of what occurs extends beyond God's control. None of His enemies ever get a free pass. There is a day of reckoning to come when God will destroy all evil and establish a throne of perfect righteousness...in this world, as it is in heaven. Evil will resist and even war against it, but the Day of the Lord is coming. Count on it.

Proverbs 11:22 is the takeaway today. What a picture! Like a beautiful piece of jewelry in the nose of a pig is a beautiful woman who lacks discretion. The ring is valuable and desired and precious (just as the woman of beauty), but the pig just ruins it (just as the indiscretion). What does it mean to be indiscreet? It could be that this is a reference to promiscuous behavior. It may mean that the woman "cussed like a sailor" or gossipped or wasted possessions, etc. Either way...the application is the same. No matter how good we look on the outside, if our inside (heart) doesn't appear consistent...it is of no value. In other words, we cannot take pleasure in looking like a wonderful committed Christ-follower on Sunday...while being an insolent, rebellious, mean person on Monday. This applies both to men and women. We must endeavor to be consistient...inside and out.

(Tomorrow, we go back to the New Testament. See you in the Book of Hebrews!)
Grace,

Take Two: Joel 2, Proverbs 10

2009-03-10T06:04:00.003-05:00

Joel 2 has two major "movements" in it. The first takes place in Joel 2:1-11. This is a continuation, or amplification, of the chapter 1. The coming Day of the Lord (day of judgment) is described. In Joel 2:2, the darkness likely is descriptive of the locust swarms. The swarms sweep across the land, ravaging everything. Also in mind is the continuing drought. (We discussed both of these previously).

In the midst of the "coming judgment," there is a call to repentance (Joel 2:12-17). Return to God in repentence and brokenness. Show brokenness of heart, not just religious activity (Joel 2:2). As a people, return to God.

Why would one return to God when He is viewed as the One who has judged the people and brought the circumstances upon them?

Because God is gracious and compassionate (Joel 2:13). He does bring judgment...but not with malicious intent. He does so in response to the evil and rebellion of man. To believe otherwise would be like a child hitting his sister and then being angry at the parent who punishes him. The child brought the circumstances which dictated the punishment. To blame the parent for being "mean" is unwarranted. The parent is merely acting justly; in fact, to not act... is to act unjustly. Who will defend righteousness and speak for the victim? If the parent does not...who will? God does as He does, because He is who He is. He is righteous and just...and at the same time gracious and merciful.

If there is repentence, what can the people expect? Just as God is certain to bring judgment (the Day of the Lord is coming... It is never presented here as a possibility, but a coming reality), God is also certain to act mercifully toward His repentent people (Joel 2:18). God will remove the judgment and defend the people from their enemies (Joel 2:19-21). He will provide for their natural needs (Joel 2:22-27). He will also restore them and give them their spiritual needs (Joel 2:28-32).

If this is true (and I believe it is), we do not need to wonder if God will act to restore His Name among His people. We can KNOW that He will do this...because His actions are certain...in response to the real repentence of His people.

The idea presented here is one of "corporate" or "national" repentence, but the principle applies as individuals as well. We do not act religiously to provoke God to bless us. This would be akin to rending our garments and not our hearts (Joel 2:13). We repent because God is good and we have rebelled. We repent because God demands committed followers, not rebellious followers. God is not negotiating with His people. He has established a standard and the only variable is whether we will respond appropriately...or not. If we trust God to be properly related to our spouse, our children, our church and spiritual leaders, our national leaders...if we trust God with our money, our vocations, and our plans...God will deal graciously with us.

Will we always see it (as it is happening) or will it happen in the timing we think is best? Maybe not; however, God is at work in a much bigger way than we can imagine. He is faithful to graciously provide the strength of endurance, or the blessing of victory. Either way...it is grace. Without God, there is only the certain prospect of the coming judgment which is surely ours.

Proverbs 10:3 is the takeaway today. Both the righteous and the wicked request from God. Only the righteous has surety that God will answer. In both cases, the request is made known. In both cases, the requestor is sincere. In both cases, God acts justly. He meets the needs of those who are righteous. The wicked has no such security. He depends on his own efforts ALONE for his provision.

Take Two: Joel 1, Proverbs 9

2009-03-09T06:11:00.003-05:00

Joel is one of the OT Prophets. Little is known about him directly. Most of what we know of him and his ministry comes from context. He is mentioned one time in the NT (Acts 2:16-21).

The positioning of the book in the OT Canon, along with the context of the writing indicates that the setting is in the 9th century BC (likely in the latter part of the century--835 BC).

There are three major sections of the book. All of them relate to the "Day of the Lord," which is a phrase that refers (often times) to the impending judgment of God.

In Chapter 1, we see a calling from the prophet to the people for AWARENESS. Joel 1:1-3, the prophet asks the question: "Hey, look around at how bad things are. Has this ever happened before? Tell your children!" Look at your situation. Look back in history. Tell those coming behind you (your sons and grandsons) about the times in which they live.

This is a calling to those who have some level of maturity (Joel 1:2) to step back and observe the times critically. Every person, family, and society can become "wrapped up" in their own situation. They can become so close to the circumstances of their lives...that they miss the big picture of what is happening. These verses are a call to step back and try to catch the big picture.

The land was experiencing a drought and a heavy infestation of locusts. For an agricultural society...there is nothing worse that could happen. Both the drought and the locusts would have clearly been understood as the judgment of God against the nation. In one corner of a city, it might not seem that bad...but to step back and see the widespread destruction...would strike a cord of concern in the hearts of the people. The logical question should have been: "Why is the judgment of God against us?"

Notice the progression of the judgment. First is the destruction of the pleasures and excesses. The drunkard no longer had wine to drink (Joel 1:5). No one will die because the "new/sweet wine" is dried up...but the picture is that the abundance of blessings are withering away. The fact that the "drunkard" is mentioned, points to the consumption in excess of what was commonly considered a blessing. Stage 1, the excess of blessings were dried up.

Second, the judgment was affecting the worship. There were reductions in some cases and eliminations in others of the sacrifices in the temple for worship (Joel 1:9). First, the excesses are affected...then worship suffers. This brings (or should bring) mourning...like the mourning of a young woman over the untimely death of her husband (Joel 1:8). Without the sacrifices in worship...the people were cut off from their covenant relationship with God.

Joel 1:13-14 is a call to the priests and the religious leaders to "call" the people to fast and mourn and beg God for forgiveness and restoration...relief from the judgment upon them. There is a strong sense of urgency! Why? Because there is one stage to come...

Joel 1:14-20 describes the continuation of the downward spiral of consequences. The impending "Day of the Lord" speaks of a final judgment which will result in utter destruction. The picture is that of starvation and fields being destroyed...and even livestock wandering in search of food...without relief.

Two quick applications. I imagine that the farmers did not pay much attention to the first locusts when the came to town. They thought that the circumstances was isolated. As the locust was left unattended, it grew to a point of great destruction. Sin does that in our lives. The slow progression of sin in our lives, left unchecked, leads us to a place when we look around and realize how bad things have become.

Second, as certain as the historical components of this judgment (the reduction in supply of wine and the reality of locusts), is the impending judgment of utter destruction. The call is on the people to publicly, corporately, repent and beg God for revival. The instruction was not for the farmers to buy pesticide. It was not for the government to ration the wine. The call was for repentance.

I see many parallels in our world today. Having watched retirement plans dwindle and excesses go away, I also have seen the devotion to God impacted. Some have RIGHTFULLY credited God with the removal of the blessings...but have written off the occurrence as some tantrum pitched by a "mean despot." NOT SO! The response is not to become angry or cynical toward God...but to repent and beg God for renewal. One day...it will certainly be too late.

Proverbs 9:12 is the takeaway today. This verse struck me uniquely this morning. We are not told to embrace wisdom because our doing so benefits God. When people scoff (mock, reject, argue with, hate) at God's wisdom, He is not slighted or hurt. God is. Period. He is self-sufficient and self-sustaining. He does not need us to act wisely in order to help Him. He provides Wisdom for our benefit. Those who reject wisdom, does so to their own demise.

Take Two: Galatians 6, Proverbs 8

2009-03-08T06:34:00.004-05:00

Galatians 6 is a powerful chapter for living as a Christ-follower. Keeping this chapter in context...Paul has been pointing out the errors in the actions of the Galatians. His words have brought deep conviction and now the question remains: "what will they do?"

Notice in Gal 6:1, Paul addresses those who are "spiritual," and instructs them to restore those who have fallen away. He cautions them to take care as they go about this work of restoration...to be gentle and to guard against being tempted themselves. The instruction is not for them to be condemning, but for them to be redemptive. This does not mean that Paul wanted them to compromise on the sin...only to be empathetic (bearing in mind that any one of them could be there too.)

Gal 6:2 tells them to bear the burdens of one another and in doing this, they fulfill the Law of Christ. Being helped along the way and helping others along the way is the instruction. This is why we have been directed as believers to be part of an active covenant community of other believers. In other words, church is not an option. It is absolutely necessary to survive and thrive in this life.

Gal 6:6 is an instruction for the church (those being taught) to support their teachers/pastors. In God's economy, this is how he provides for his people (both people and pastor).

Gal 6:7-10 is "keeping it real" for those in Paul's audience. They should look to reap what they sow. Responding to the Spirit with commitment yields spiritual fruit. Responding to the Spirit with rebellion and resistence, yields fleshly fruit. God does not respond to rebellion with blessing.
Gal 6:11-18 is the postscript that is pretty common for Paul, especially in the climate when false teachers are trying to bring into question that which the church held firm to. Up to this point in the letter, Paul used an emanuesis (pronounced ee-man-you-aye-sis...meaning a secretary) to write the letter. From this point forward, he takes the quill and ink himself.

Gal 6:14 is a great prayer. Why am I what I am? On what do I make my boast? What is it that I have accomplished in life? All that I have is that which was given me by Jesus at the cross...so I now live as I do in accordance with the new life Christ has given.

Gal 6:17 is a special verse (to me.) Paul gives the contrast between the aim of the false teachers and his aim. Some sought to be circumcised so that they could boast in their identity with God. Paul boasted in the cross. His marks were different. His choices to follow Christ made him the target of persecution (beatings, imprisonment...hard living.) When people look at your marks...do they see a religious symbol, or a life that gives evidence of the consequence of following Christ?

Proverbs 8:17 is the takeaway today. The speaker is "wisdom" personified. Wisdom states that she loves those who love her. She also states that those who "diligently" seek her shall find her. Discovering the wisdom of God is laborious at times. At a surface level, the Word may appear one way, but upon deeper consideration...it says something else. [I am not speaking of some "secret knowledge" concept...but of the effort required to process the things of God.] When we consider the difficult subjects (i.e. the presence of evil inthe world, why bad things happen to good people, heaven/hell, praising God in adversity) we must labor to grasp who God is...at His essence...so that we can know the wisdom of God. Thsi is called "theology" and we are all called to be students of it. To not pursue understanding in this way...will yield ungrounded lives that are tossed here and there by every wind of doctrine. Wisdom calls, "if you love me, seek me diligently and I shall be found." Will you? Are you?

Tomorrow, we shift back to the OT. We will be reading the book of Joel for the next few days. See you there!

So here is what I am considering...

2009-03-07T17:44:00.003-06:00

Just checking in. I need to get a feel from you guys about how the site works for you and what you desire/like about the morning blogs. Right now, I use this site (though I prefer another one) because it allows for hyperlinks of the bible references I use.

Do you guys use these...or are you like me...(i.e. have a bible open before or when you read?)

I like the other site (and address) better, but don't want to inconvenience anyone who uses the feature I have set up on this site now.

If you would...please leave a comment with you preferences. Just tell me. I will decide from there.

Thanks for reading!!!!

Take Two: Galatians 5, Proverbs 7

2009-03-07T06:44:00.003-06:00

Chapter 5 is another "meaty" chapter in the book. Gal 5:1-12 speaks of committing to one way or the other. The context is still one of persuasian. Paul is not saying that both "Salvation by Grace" and "Salvation by Works" are effective. He is moving the argument along. There were some (I believe) who had stated, "Well, if I am saved by Grace, then anything else I do has no effect on my Salvation. I can be saved by Grace...and keep the Jewish Law too.

Paul draws a line and tells the people that they must choose. By acting in accordance with the Law...one denies the working of the Spirit. Let me put it another way.

If a person claimed to be a Christian today, but also wanted to practice "wicca" (witchcraft), she might make the same argument. I am saved...so nothing I do can separate me. You could substitute anything you wanted in place of "wicca" and would still have the same thing. (humanism, buddhism, Islam, or other false religions that teach salvation is accomplished in any way apart from receiving the finished work of Christ by faith.) Paul tells the church that they must choose.

The other aspect of the argument is "countered" in the next section (Gal 5:13-26). Some would rebut what Paul stated by saying that if what Paul says is true...then people will live any way they want!

Here is the point: Religious liberty is not the same as a license to sin.

We have liberty...but we exercise our liberty according to the principles of LOVE. We cannot act in a manner which is unloving toward others and call it religious liberty. In the same manner, one cannot claim to be a child of God and practice a lifestyle that is opposed to God. We either operate according to the "flesh" or the "Spirit." This is not saying that a Christian never commits a sin like those listed in Gal 5:19-21. We all fall short and commit sin (1 John 1:8). The key word is "practice" (Gal 5:21). Christians do sin... they just don't "set out to do it" and they "don't enjoy it." If you can carry forward with "sin" (you pick which one) and not be bothered by it...then you need to re-examine your relationship with Jesus. Walking by the FLESH and the SPIRIT is not possible since the two are mutually incompatible (Gal 5:17).

Just to summarize what Paul has been saying to this point.

First, you cannot add anything to the gospel and still have the gospel. Salvation by grace PLUS anything...is no longer salvation by grace.
Second, the Law was never intended as a means of salvation; rather, it was a tutor/instructor/teacher/guide which pointed to and made people aware that there was no way to master the Law and keep it perfectly...thus pointing for the need for grace and mercy.
Third, the peace that comes with salvation cannot be experienced except through a genuine salvation. Since that occurred only through Grace, why would anyone go back to a system which promotes activity that does not lead to peace.
Fourth, One cannot ride the fence on the matter. The nature of the gospel is such that one must choose.
Fifth, when we choose the gospel (the real one), we also choose to walk by the Spirit...meaning that we choose to live in a manner that is opposed to the flesh. We still wrestle with the flesh (Rom 7), but we choose IN ADVANCE how we intend to act in a given situation, because we have already chosen to walk by the Spirit.

Tomorrow, we will conclude with a call to action...an invitation of sorts from Paul on how to get back on track.

Proverbs 7:22 is the takeaway today. This story begins in v.7 where the naive young man began to wander toward the seedier side of town. It was there that the adultress approached him and began to tempt. Some time elapses where he was enticed. Then, v.22 says that suddenly he follows her, not realizing his own fate. There are a number of warning devices in this life. The Holy Spirit speaks into my life and warns me to turn away from sin and tempting situations. When I don't, I get drawn deeper and deeper into the scenario...until suddenly, I am so far into it, that I can't seem to turn around. Actually, the decision of no return was sudden, but I was not overtaken in sin. I simply gave in on the small steps leading up to the decision.

This is why we are told to flee sin...resist the enemy...and pursue after God. Otherwise...we will stray down a path until suddenly, we are captured by it.

Take Two: Galatians 4, Proverbs 6

2009-03-06T06:18:00.003-06:00

As we move into chapter 4, Paul's purpose has not changed. He is still arguing against the false teaching that Christians are required to observe the Jewish Law. His reason for arguing against this is simple: It is false and he wants to WIN back the Galatians to the gospel which he introduced them to...that Salvation is accomplished by God's grace through their faith in Him...not by keeping the elements of the Jewish Law.

In Gal 4:1-7, Paul notes that at the perfect time (Gal 4:4), Jesus came as a Jew so that He might win the Jews and set them free to experience the fullness of God that belongs to the Sons of God. Did Jesus' death also accomplish salvation for the Gentiles? YES. Paul is not arguing otherwise...rather, he is focusing on the fact that "if Judaism could save," then Jesus did not need to come as a Jew.

The logical conclusion one can draw from this is found in Gal 4:8-11. Why would anyone go back to "keeping" the Jewish Law...if Jesus came to set people free who were under it?

Gal 4:12-20, Paul reminds the Galatians that they loved the peace of God that they experienced when they accepted his teachings. Why would they think that the "lack of peace" they were feeling now was more God's will than the peace they had already experienced. Let me give an analogy.

Suppose you, as a parent, saved all year to buy your child the gift that they always wanted. When you present it, the child accepts it and enjoys it. A little later, the neighbor kid comes over and begins to convince your child that the invisible toy he has is way cooler than the one your child is playing with. Eventually, your child begins to "parrot" the neighbor kid's story. Your child shuns his toy and even begins to pretend he has an invisible toy too. He is not nearly as happy as he was when he played with the real toy...but has been "programmed" that the invisible toy must be better, since the neighbor said so. You as a parent, observe how downcast your child appears. You begin to remind your child how good it felt to play with the toy he once had. You tell him that the neighbor kid is just jealous because he doesn't have one. You remind him of how valuable the toy is and how much you love him...as demonstrated in giving the toy. Your goal...to get your child to go back and begin enjoying the real toy that once brough him great joy...and to reject the foolishness of the invisible toy...which cannot satisfy in the same way as the real toy. Paul is trying to accomplish the same thing.

Paul's final argument of this chapter is an allegorical comparison (Gal 4:24) of the Galatian's situation...with the sons of Abraham: Ishmael and Isaac (Gal 4:21-31). He says, (in essence) why would Isaac ever want to be Ishmael. Isaac was the son of promise...why would he ever want to be Ishmael. Both sons had the same father, but only one had the promise. Why would the child of promise ever be envious of the child who existed outside of the promise. Paul conclude this section by reminding the Galatian readers...Ishmael would not experience any of the blessings of Isaac. (The implication being that there was no equivalence betwen Judaism and Christianity. Only Christianity could and would satisfy.)

There is a tendency in all of us to think that we are missing "something." This makes us susceptible to whatever some clown is selling. We buy stuff off of the TV because we are convinced by the salesman that our lives are lacking without it. If we could "step back" and observe the reality of our situation and the offer OBJECTIVELY...we might come to different conclusions. This is why it is important to submit ourselves to the wisdom of community (church) and to the counsel of others. A good friend will help us see our blindspots. Paul is being a good friend (and preacher) to the Galatians. We all need well-grounded, articulate, and wise friends in our lives to help us see what is patently unclear to us without them.

Proverbs 6:23-24 is the takeaway today. God's Word (commandment) is the lamp. Teaching (application and explanation of the commandment) is the light. God's Word without application or explanation is simply a device which exists. The fulfilled purpose of God's Word is for it to be understood and applied. By doing so, we have a defense against the consistent "slipping away" toward the evil way and that which ensnares us. Understand...that to NOT resist evil is to slip into it by default. Being righteous requires intentional activity, a resistence to the allure of sin.

Take Two: Galatians 3, Proverbs 5

2009-03-05T06:40:00.003-06:00

Paul continues his argument of justification (Salvation) by faith and not by works of the Law. He first appeals to experience.

The Galatians had received affirmation of the Spirit by faith and not the Law (Gal 3:1-3). The question Paul implies here...is if the Law were able to save, why did they not receive the affirmation of the Spirit under it, rather than by faith? He then make a logical connection: If you received the Spirit by faith...why do you need to be sanctified (perfected) by keeping the Law?

He then appeals to Abraham. The Scripture said that Abraham was reckoned to God (justified by Faith), before the Law was written. Not only that, but the Abrahamic promise, the salvation of the Nations through Abraham, is a foreshadowing of the work of Christ (the blessing form the seed of Abraham), not of a coming of the Law (Gal 3:6-14).

Paul then appeals to human practice. No one makes a contract and then adds to it...more conditions (Gal 3:15-18) that must be fulfilled in order to achieve the results of the contract. So, Paul is affirming that the Law was never intended to be a means of becoming righteous, nor the primary way people were to relate to God. The relation contract was ratified before the Law. The Law served as a "tutor" or guide to lead us to Christ (Gal 3:24-29). There are no "super saints" who are more holy by keeping the Law; nor, are there any people (Jews or otherwise) who are justified by keeping the Law. All salvation/justification is..and has always been...by believing God and having God "reckon/account it as righteousness."

Now to a point of application that I made to a reader in a previous comment. This same Paul who said that Salvation is by Faith alone...also called himself a bondservant of Christ. Some misuse and abuse salvation by faith and make it a justification for rebellion and lethargy. God has a plan and purpose for you and I. We are to fulfill that plan, because we are the children of God...not to become the children of God. Grace is not a license to act as WE want, but is an act of a Holy God toward us...which provokes in us good works. The two are not exclusive of one another.

To the one who says, "I am saved by grace, so I will live and do as I please," has missed the point of salvation...and may have missed salvation altogether. Who said that? Jesus: (John 14:23-24).

Proverbs 5:22 is the takeaway today. A man who lives without God is captured by his own sins. The sin forms a cord of bondage that holds him back. No man can break free once he is bound. It takes another to loosen/ break the cords. No man is overcome by the devil and forced to sin. That which captures him is entered into willingly and voluntarily. True, he may not be fully aware of the consequences, but it is one's own actions nonetheless. Fortunately, the "system" was never designed for a man to set himself free from the cords/bondage of sin. God is the one who liberates and praise belongs to Him alone.

Take Two: Galatians 2, Proverbs 4

2009-03-04T06:13:00.004-06:00

In Chapter 2, Paul is further defending the fact that the gospel he preached (salvation is by grace and not by keeping the Law of Moses) is well known among those closest to Jesus and is accepted by them.

Remember that the matter at issue is the "changing" of the gospel message to ADD the keeping of Jewish law as a requirement for Salvation. Paul is certainly a man who would allow Christian liberty in observing Jewish Law. He would not prevent the keeping of the Law as an act of worship by those who did it as a matter of conscience (See Roman 7); however, he was opposed to these same zealots mandating that someone else keep the Law in order to be saved.

What you have "evolving" here is a disunity in the church. There is a two-class mentality bubbling to the surface. Those who came from a strong Jewish (likely Pharisee) background began to see themselves as somewhat "better" than those without the same background. They began to look down their noses at those who did not treat the Law of Moses the same way they did.

Out of this zeal for the observance of the Law came a distorted presentation of the gospel.

In Gal 2:1-2, Paul noted that he went to Jerusalem and met privately with the church's leaders there, on his own initiative (not because he was summoned to the principal's office). The outcome of this meeting was that not even the Gentile among them, Titus, was to be circumcised (Gal 2:3). It was determined that Paul had been given a ministry to the Gentiles and it would look different than Peter's ministry to the Jews; however, both ministries were unified in essence and in Whom they served (Gal 2:5-10).

Don't miss that point. God is big enough to give two men two different approaches to Kingdom mission and still be One God. Sometimes people today think we have to be one or the other. There is room for those who are legalistic in some of their practices (Pianos, Organs, and KJV) as well as those who are more "fluid," (Praise teams, art and drama, blue jeans, and the New Living Translation). Each of us has a preference, but our preferences are not the gospel. The gospel is the gospel. Our preferences are our preferences.

A friend (church planter) of mine had a group in the early days of his church demand that homeschooling was the only biblical way to educate children. They wanted that to be taught as part of the core beliefs of the new church. He refused and they left. Why? Because they wanted to add to the gospel (what it means to be a follower fo Christ) and he was resolute at defending the pure gospel.

In Gal 2:11-21 Paul gives another example of how serious he was at defending the gospel. He points out/reminds the church that he (Paul) even went toe-to-toe with Peter on the issue. Peter hung out with the Gentiles on most days, but when the zealous Jewish brothers came to town, Peter acted differently. Paul called Peter out! To not do so would have caused others to think that Peter's actions were appropriate and even embrace them themselves.

Notice then two different ways of approaching the disunity. I think it is instructive for us. First, there are times when it is necessary to approach people in private and seek clarity and resolution. There are other times when it is best suited to address matters publicly. When do you differentiate?

You might hate this but here goes. Bearing principles in mind...it has to be a "led by the Holy Spirit" thing. It is not black and white. There are principles involved, not the least of which is how best to accomplish a RIGHTEOUS UNITY in the Body. (Soapbox alert: Not just unity, which might be construed as a lack of conflict. RIGHTEOUS UNITY which is a firm resolve that God is...and we are called to align with Him in it. We change our approaches to follow after God. Period. )

Proverbs 4:6 is the takeaway today. Do not forsake [wisdom]...love [wisdom]; and, [wisdom] will guard you and watch over you. To not forsake is simply to set the boundaries and observe them. To love...is to actively and intentionally explore wisdom and apply it to our lives. Wisdom guards us as a fence sets the protective boundaries of our homes; while, watching over us gives a picture of wisdom being active and searching. It is a living presence in our daily lives. As with yesterday, it is loving wisdom that speaks of our response to its value. We are to value God's Word and love it, seeking to explore and apply it in every way. By doing so, we gain not only boundaries that guard...but a God who watches over and guides our steps moment by moment.

Grace,

Take Two: Galatians 1, Proverbs 3

2009-03-03T05:33:00.003-06:00

Galatians is one of the most enlightening and unique books in the New Testament. Unlike many of Paul's other writing, this letter is "teeming" with passionate defense and frontal assault of danger to the gospel. Paul writes to a region of churches, to the northeast of the Mediterranean Sea.

In Gal 1:1-5 Paul begins the letter with the customary address, which identifies him, his audience, and a word of blessing/greeting. Paul identifies himself as an apostle...and this identification brings to bear the full weight of the office and the authority of the sender. Paul does not speak as a philosopher, but as a messenger with a specific and authoritative message from Jesus.

He wastes no time getting to the point which prompted his writing. The churches in Galatia were being influenced in such a way that the very message of the gospel was being changed (Gal 1:6-10). The changes are not slight variations...but are in essence the proposition of another gospel, which Paul says is a false gospel. A perversion of the truth is not a harmless or inconsequential adjustment...it is a fundamental change to the nature of the gospel. Paul speaks in no uncertain terms to the "gospel" which is gaining popularity in the region. He pronounces it to be a false gospel and proclaims that its preachers are to be accursed!

Paul alludes to the fact that this false gospel has arisen from a desire to make the gospel more man-centric than God-centric...something more pleasing to men. You and I cannot change the gospel in such a way to make it more agreeable to us, without making in disagreeable to God. Paul notes that salvation is by grace alone (Gal 1:6), and not by grace plus philosophy/knowledge (gnosticism), or grace plus circumcision (Judaism).

It seems that some had charged that Paul had gotten off track by being influenced by the uneducated disciples of Jesus. They accused Paul of having lost his way. Paul defends the fact that the substance of his preaching/ gospel was given by Christ and not by man (Gal 1:11-24). It is not that Paul was confused about the gospel. He knew full well what he was preaching and how it differed from his previous life as a devout Pharisee. He even proposes that his preaching of salvation by grace was not a mistake; rather, it was a tool that, when contrasted with his Jewish zeal before Christ, actually drew people to God. The transformation that had taken place in his life was the very tool that God was using to reveal Himself.

Observation: God has not changed. He has and will always use the transformation of our lives as his primary "hook" for the gospel. The gospel loses its "draw-power" when there is no transformation. To propose that life goes on as usual once we "get saved" is to propose that there was nothing really wrong with us in our lives without Christ.

Has there been a measurable, observable change in your life? Have you come to a place when you know that you were made different because you asked Jesus to save you...not because you deserved it, but because He is gracious? If not, then there is no biblical precedent for you to have confidence in your relationship with God. Every biblical model I have ever seen involves a deep work of God in a person's life that resulted in a dramatic and observable difference.

Proverbs 3:25-26 is the takeaway today. I was impressed that much of the struggle we face with obedience and authority has to do with thinking too far ahead. We want to be obedient...but we wonder, "What will this mean later...or how will this work out down the road." God is a step-by-step God. We are to live by faith, meaning we are to be obedient now...knowing that He is in control and will care for us then. Many times, we can only see two results from a given course of action. Truthfully, our evaluation may be in error. Sometimes, God interjects the "x" factor and creates a third result we did not see to begin with...because He alone is wise and good and gracious.

Begin with "Yes, we can."

2009-03-03T04:56:00.005-06:00

A reason to say "Yes." I read a great post by Seth Godin on Monday. His post is linked here. Seth is a business marketing guru and cultural communicator and he makes some good observations, primarily for the business world. Occasionally, I find an application to what we do in other areas of our lives...specifically for me, in the church.

When confronted with "the challenge," do you look for reasons to make it happen, or reasons to decline? When someone stop you "midstream" from point "A" to point "B" and asks if you can help them...do you default to "sure, what can I do for you?" or "I am sorry, but not right now."

We should always present the "Yes." Back in the day when I coached salesmen, I used to tell them to answer each concern or objection with "No problem," or "Absolutely." For instance, if someone says, "Your price is too high. Can you cut it?" My response: "Absolutely. We can adjust the price to a number you are comfortable with. We have worked to present a great value to you, but we are absolutely willing to work harder to customize the program further, to better fit your needs. Which of the features presented are unnecessary or should we remove?" Often, when we begin with "Yes" and then explain what it takes to get there as we work with an individual, they change their mind...but they feel that they are heard and appreciated. And...they are.

Something about beginning with "Yes" rather than "No" or "I'm Sorry" sets the tone for a great partnership. Try it this week and let me know how it goes!

Take Two: Ruth 4, Proverbs 2

2009-03-02T06:18:00.003-06:00

As we come to the conclusion of the book of Ruth, we see the scene which takes place the morning after Ruth lies at Boaz's feet. Boaz goes to the city gates, where all of the official business of the city was conducted (Ru 4:1-3). Boaz proposes to his close relative, possible a brother (Ru 4:3), that he is first in line to purchase Elimelech's land from Naomi.

Land was supposed to stay within a family as an ongoing inheritance. This encounter and statement is a bit unusual since it introduces new information to us about the land. Since Elimelech and Naomi moved to Moab a decade before, it seemed that there was no property that belonged to them. Either way, the land is secondary...as well as the information about the brother who is never identified.

The close relative was happy to redeem the land. This would have been the equivalent of buying "distressed" properties in our culture today. He likely thought that the addition to his holdings would strengthen his financial position (Ru 4:4).

Boaz then states that it is morally right to also redeem the widow of the dead, a Moabitess named Ruth (and to care for Naomi.) If this man was tuned in to what was happening in the city, he would have known that to get Ruth was to get Naomi (See Ru 2:11).

The close relative makes an unusual statement at this point that has been variously interpreted. He states that to do so would cost him his inheritance (Ru 4:6). It is unclear what is meant, but I believe that he is saying, "Man! Two women go with this deal? At my age, I may have what...one son with this Ruth? No way...then if I have anything left, it will all be left to Elimelech's descendents rather than my own." Of course he could mean, "No way. My wife would kill me if I came home with two widows!"

Either way...the man passes on his right and responsibility as a redeemer and the right passes to Boaz who accepts gladly. The deal is consumated by the exchanging of sandals, and witnessed by all of the men in the city gates. The people in the gates offer a statement of blessing on the consumation of the transaction (Ru 4:11-12).

The next movement in the book is the detail of how the offspring of Boaz and Ruth the Moabitess is the grandfather of King David. God's plan for the redeemer bears testimony of His goodness. Because of the faithfulness of these people to God's covenant...a king will be born.

One last thing. The story begins with the trials of Naomi. She has concluded that God has dealt unfavorably with her (Ru 1:20-21). Within only a short time, God demonstrates and Naomi recognizes that all things work TOGETHER for good, for those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose (Romans 8:28).

If you find yourself in a dark place and wonder why God is against you...you may only be days away from seeing His unfolding plan. Stay faithful to the Covenant-maker. He is good and always acts as such.

Proverbs 2:4-5 is the takeaway today. For those who pursue God's wisdom as though it were valuable, they will gain it and profit from it. A shoe store I went into in NY was called "Shoe Carnival." One of their gimics was a money machine. If you were picked as the customer to go in...you had a few seeconds in this machine to gather the money which was flying around you. Whenever someone went in, they scurried frantically to gather in as much money as possible. It was quite a sight to see. Never did I see anyone just hold out their hand waiting on money to fall in it. They sought after it. Why? Because it was valuable. If we seek after the wisdom of God with the same zeal, we too will find it. If we are passive or resistant...we will miss it every time.

Tomorrow we return to the NT with the book of...Galatians. See you there!

Take Two: Ruth 3, Proverbs 1

2009-03-01T07:14:00.003-06:00

Chapter 3 is one of the more risque' chapter in the Scripture. Keep a couple of things in mind as you read. First, it is a narrative...meaning that its structure and language is intended to continue to draw the reader/hearer into the story. So, while it is intentionally ambiguous in parts...the meaning was clear in the minds of the reader/hearer. They were saying things without saying things. Second, allow the text to speak for itself. While this seems subdued compared to prime time television, and it may be that we default to a soap opera thought process, there is no reason to read more into the text than the original audience would. (Sometimes our interpretation is weighted in favor of our own predispositions).

The big picture in this chapter is the kinsmen redeemer. Whenever a woman, one of the most vulnerable people in society, was left as a widow, she was in danger of losing everything. She could not go find a job. She could not, as a rule, expect support from society. Her best hope was to remarry. Secondly, in the biblical period, the continuation of a "line" of descendents was very important. If a man died without an heir, his family line would cease to exist. So, God codified the kinsmen redeemer provision to address both of these issues.

If a man did not have a male heir and was killed, his closest relative, usually a brother, would take his widow as his own wife. He would give her a son and then provide for her as one of his own household. The first son that was born was to be considered the heir of the deceased first husband. This provided both for the wife and for the continuation of the line.

Now you may think, "I am not interested in marrying my brother-in-law." Understandably, we are removed somewhat from the circumstances in the text. Instead of seeing it as being forced to marry a brother-in-law, look at it as God's ongoing provision for your welfare. You are that important to God.

Naomi tells Ruth her intentions that Ruth would be cared for and that the kinsmen redeemer would be the best course for her (Ru 3:1-5). Naomi instructs Ruth to bathe, put on perfume and fresh clothes. This is typical of a woman preparing for marriage.

Ruth goes and finds Boaz at the threshing floor where he has been working to harvest the grain. Customarily, the men would sleep near their grain during this season to protect it from theives and animals. The circumstances have led many commentators to speculate that prostitution was probably a factor in this setting. This may explain why Boaz did not simply "kick" the woman at his feet when she was discovered.

Ru 3:4 gives the instruction to "uncover his feet." This would have caused the hearers to blush. Often times, this language carried with it a sexual overtone. It is likely in this case as well. However, Ruth was instructed not to force the matter with Boaz, but to uncover his feet and wait on instructions. Naomi had confidence that Boaz would do the right thing.

In the balance of the chapter, Boaz awakes and discovers Ruth. She asks him to redeem her (Ru 3:9). She could have said, "marry me and give me a child." (same meaning). Boaz compliments her on her excellence and then does something surprising...he tells her that she has a closer relative. This is not a put-off, but a statement to Boaz's integrity as well. He did not sleep with her and then say...Uh Oh. Had no idea that "Bubba" (the closer relative) was still in the picture. He promises her that he will approach the other kinsman and then, if he refuses, Boaz will redeem her. He then tells her to sleep there at his feet until early in the morning. He gives her some grain and she returns under cover of darkness to Naomi early in the morning.

Naomi tells her that Boaz will settle the matter that day (Ru 3:17). Almost hard to wait...isn't it?

Keep in mind the presentation of the character of both Ruth and Boaz...as well as that of Naomi. All are presented as having pure motives. As such, since they are honoring the covenant with God as His people (and a foreigner among His people), God will provide and demonstrate His faithfulness to the covenant with them.

Proverbs 1:33 is the takeaway. We never have to worry about the outcome when we determine in advance to stand with God. We are secure in our hope if we have chosen His plan for our lives. This is an ongoing process. To experience the fullness of hope and security of a believer, is to daily follow the counsel of God in all things.

Take Two: Ruth 2, Proverbs 28

2009-02-28T06:46:00.003-06:00

The writer connects for us now how Boaz fits into the picture. Boaz is a a close relative (Ruth 2:1, Ruth 2:20). He is wealthy and has much land. In ancient culture, widows, foreigners, and orphans are the most helpless of society. They lack the ability to provide for themselves (as a general rule). God, as a picture of grace and as a testimony of His concern for all peoples (the foreigner as well as His own), ascribed in the Law that His people were to allow the helpless to "glean" after the reapers at harvest (Lev 19:9-10, Lev 23:22, Deut 24:19). Doing so, was an act of trust/worship of God and a way of providing for those with need. Picture it like this:

God gives you instruction saying that when unloading your groceries into the car, anything that you cannot gather in four bags will be left for the person who comes after you. Yes you have bought it, but it is left for those after you as an act of worship and trust in God who provides.

Ruth does not "whine" about her circumstances, but seeks permission from Naomi to go and gather after the reapers and pick up their leftovers (Ruth 2:2-3). She "happens" (tongue-in-cheek theology veiled as coincidence) upon Boaz's fields and seeks permission to glean after the reapers (Ru 2:7). This is above and beyond...if not practical. She had a "right" to glean according to Israelite Law, but recognized that she should exhibit humility (not to manipulate...but because it was the right thing to do.).

Boaz instructs the servants to treat her as one of their own, and even blesses Ruth by telling her to drink from the water reserved for his servants (Ru 2:9). Ruth is perplexed at Boaz's kindness...why he would bless her when she is a foreigner. Catch his response: Ruth 2:11-12. Boaz showed grace toward Ruth because she had lived a life or humility and had served her mother-in-law. Notice: this is a not a works based religious action. He is not compensating her for her works, nor did Ruth act in the way she did so that she would be compensated. Ruth acted with humility and grace...because it was right. Boaz acted toward her as an instrument of God's Hand because he is gracious and kind.

Some today struggle with this concept in the contemporary church. Some elevate Grace to the point that they "feel" that they should never do anything but "soak up" God's grace. This is presumptive at best. We do not work to earn favor with God. Any favor we receive is because God is kind. However, people who love God act like it. Someone who acts like the "world" really loves the world.

Boaz even instructs his servants to intentionally leave behind some of the harvest on the ground for Ruth to pick up (Ru 2:16). When Ruth was finished for the day, she beat out the grain and carried it to Naomi and shared what she had experienced. She even brough Naomi her leftover lunch (Ru 2:18).

Naomi starts to get a picture of what God is up to (Ru 2:20). She instructs Ruth to do just as Boaz has told her...which she does for many weeks during the harvest seasons (Ru 2:23).

God is caring for Ruth and Naomi through His provision in the Law and the willing heart of a faithful servant named Boaz. God is ministering to Naomi by showing her that He has not forgotten her. God is teaching Ruth about Himself through the provision and blessing of being among His people. Never overlook the meta-narrative. God is weaving together a much greater tapestry than we can readily see when we focus on our immediate circumstances.

Proverbs 28:9 is the takeaway today. I was drawn to this verse today. A man who intentionally turns from the purpose of God can take no comfort in God's graciousness. Even his prayer is an abomination. I wonder how often...Christians know of something that God would have them do...and refuse? I bet they pray. I bet they go on going to church and try to act as though all is normal. It is not that their prayer simply goes UNANSWERED...but that their prayer is OFFENSIVE and an AFFRONT to God. How does a child say, "I don't want the dinner you fixed," and "give me something to eat" in the same breath? When we are separated from God in any way, and know it, the prayer God hears is "I am sorry" and "forgive me according to your mercy and lovingkindness."

Take Two: Ruth 1, Proverbs 27

2009-02-27T06:20:00.002-06:00

As we begin this new study, a little background is in order. First, the book is in its place in the OT canon (collection of Scripture) following Judges. The covenant faithfulness of the characters is magnified when compared to the covenant unfaithfulness in the periods of judges. Second, the setting is in the time fo the judges, meaning it was before the time of Israel's King. Third, the focus is certainly includes the genealogy of King David. We know this because of the emphasis on Bethlehem and the lineage of the Ephrathites of Bethlehem. Further, Ruth is mentioned in the line of Jesus (Matthew 1:5), so it is clear in context that this story was foundational and beloved in Hebrew culture throughout the ages.

The book is unique in its structure too. The title of the book comes for the Moabite woman Ruth. It is the only book named for a non-Israelite in the OT. Also, while named for Ruth, she is not really the main character. She is important, but the book could have been named for Naomi, Boaz, or Obed. So, the naming of the book after Ruth is very significant and symbolic. One last thing. The style/genre of the book is narrative. It is an unfolding story that is open to different interpretations. There is a sense of covenant faithfulness with God even though there is minimal direct communication with Him. It is understood that God is at work; however, the work is not directly attributed to Him (i.e. God caused...God made..God did.)

Ruth 1:1 opens with a profound statement. To the Hebrew reader/hearer is it obvious that God has caused a famine/drought in the land. This allusion refers to an act of judgment in response to the unfaithfulness of God's people (Lev 26:19-20, Deut 28:23-24). We as modern readers may come to a different conclusion, but to the reader/hearer of the day...this is the clear implication...God's judgment. In response to the drought, Naomi and family moved to Moab for relief (Ruth 1:2-6). There, seeking relief apart from the land of God and the people of God...Naomi lost husband and sons. She went seeking relief and found that her troubles were multiplied.

Many believers do this today as well. Seeking to find a better or more comfortable existence, we move away from God's plan/purpose/and covenant. We hope to make it better on our own...but find that God systematically dismembers our hopes apart from him until we realize our need for Him.

In Ruth 1:6-15, Naomi decides to return to Bethlehem (because she heard it was better there). She discharges her daughters-in-law (Orpah and Ruth) to stay behind among their people. She wishes them well (Ru 1:8-9) and proclaims that God has been against her (Ru 1:13). Orpah returns to Moab, but Ruth clings to Naomi (Ru 1:14). Ruth reaffirms allegience to Naomi and accepts Naomis fate as her ow (Ru 1:16-18).

Upon Naomi's return, Bethlehem was stirred and Naomi confessed all that God had done against her (Ru 1:19-22). In truth, as we will see and she will confess later, God has been for her all along. God has shown Himself faithful to make good out of her choices and to redeem for Himself a line from which to bring King David. There is a meta-narrative in play and, even though Naomi doesn't fully grasp it, God is progressive prevealing His provision.

God is often at work in ways we do not grasp or see. We tend to think that if we cannot see it, then it is not happening. This is not true. God never disengages from His careful and affectionate Hand in this world.

Proverbs 27:12 is the takeaway today. Wise people are discerning of what is occurring in their midst. They are sensitive and calculating in all areas. When they observe evil, they flee to hide. They do not embrace it, "hunker down" and "press on," or ignore it. They hide from it...wishing to have no part of it at all. The naive pay the penalty...not necessarily because they embrace the evil...but because they do not avoid it. They may have missed it. They may have ignored it. Either way, they pay for it because they failed to discern and hide. The fact that the prudent could discern... implies that the naive was neglectful in some manner. He missed something that should have/could have been caught. You and I are called to be wise. We are called to discern that which is occurring in our time and also trends that seem to be gathering in the future. Then, if wise, we are to remove ourselves from the evil and thus avoid the judgment that goes with it.

Take Two: Mark 16, Proverbs 26

2009-02-26T06:05:00.003-06:00

In theological circles, Mark 16 is one of the more heavily debated. This is due to some textual variants between different archaeological finds. Let me briefly explain.

As you may know, we do not have any "original autographs" of the Scripture. This does not mean that we do not have the Scriptures, just that we have no originals. We have thousands of copies, so there really is no legitimate question about what the originals say in 99% of the Bible. Mark 16 is one of those chapters that is disputed. Some of the earliest manuscripts stop after verse 8. Others have verse 20 (the short ending) immediately following verse 8. Some later dated manuscripts have vv.9-19 in the position that they are here. As such, theologians have debated on whether vv.9-19 are in fact part of Mark's inspired work. No one can scientifically verify either way; however, if you want an opinion, I think that it is part of the original text. Here are a couple of "simplified reasons."

First, the ending of the gospel after verse 8 would eliminate any resurrection appearances. All of the other gospels include a resurrection appearance. (Pretty important element of our theological beliefs.)
Second, the language style in vv.9-20 bears similarities with the other passages of Mark.
Third, there is no dispute about any of the details in the section, meaning that no "new" theology or otherwise unsubstantiated concepts are proposed in this section.
Fourth, there is no overwhelming reason to reject the "long ending."
Fifth, due to the reverence given to the Scriptures, it seems unlikely that a later copyist would add such an extended passage and try to pass it off as the original.

Those who oppose the "long ending" make a good argument for their position...but not overwhelming. HERE IS WHAT WE CAN TAKE FROM THIS today. Every idea/event mentioned in the "long ending" is also mentioned or supported elsewhere. If I am going to make a point from the "long ending," and it is disputed, I just cross-reference and make it from another passage as well. I have every confidence that there is no reason to question the authenticity or veracity of the Gospel of Mark...even though we may have some rational disputes on these 11 verses.

Back to the text:

In Mark 16:1-3 we see the ladies preparing to go and anoint/prepare Jesus' body for burial. From this, we can be certain that He was buried very late of Friday (close to 6PM), because if there had been time, He would have been prepared before closing the tomb. In Mark 16:4-6 we see that the women came to anoint a dead body and only found an empty tomb and an Angel. They came to serve Jesus and found that He cared for Himself. Mark 16:4 uses the "divine passive" when it states that the stone "had been" rolled away. This refers to a God-activity. GOD NEEDS NO SERVANTS. He is self-sufficient and self-satisfying.

Mark 16:7-8 gives the instructions from the angel for the women to tell the disciples...but it seems that they left and told no one (if you think it ends there). Mark 16:9-10 tells us that they did go to tell the disciples AS THE ANGEL HAD INSTRUCTED. Mark 16:12-19 give several resurrection appearances and also the commission to preach Christ to all creation (Mark 16:15). Some dispute is made over Mark 16:17-18 (the accompanying signs).

Since the modern Pentecostal movement, much attention has been given to a belief that this is a continuing promise and ability given to all Christ followers. Many people have died of snake bites trying to claim this verse as a continuing promise. Certainly the Apostolic witnesses were attested to by these signs; however, I do not believe that every believer of all times is given the ability and responsibility to heal the sick, speak in tongues, cast out demons, and take up serpents. In fact, I don't encourage taking up serpents except in small bites...with a little tabasco sauce to kill the "wild taste." (OOOOHHHHH! No he didn't just say that! Yes he did!!)

Proverbs 26:21 is the takeaway today. Contentious people are the fuel that strife lives off of. Show me dispute or division...and I will show you one or more people who thrive off of being "contrary," right in the middle of the dispute.

BEGINNING TOMORROW, we will be taking up the OT Book of Ruth. See you there!

Take Two: Mark 15, Proverbs 25

2009-02-25T06:10:00.006-06:00

If you are familiar with the Easter Story, you may be tempted to "gloss over" this chapter due to its familiarity. We all have a tendency to do this with familar stories. However, this is the most significant event in the life of a Christ-follower.

In Mark 15:1-15, we encounter the exchange before Pilate. He is the local political authority. When Jesus was brought before him, Pilate recognized that the motives of the accusers (which he did not particularly appreciate) were wrong. Still, part of Pilate's job performance review by Caesar is based on how well he keeps the peace. Jesus admits to the charges that He is the King of the Jews, that it...the awaited Messiah (Mk 15:2). Pilate saw nothing in this that caused him to desire or demand Jesus' death. In fact, many people in the world today look at Jesus the same way. They are aware of His claims, yet since it does not apply to them, they see no need to consider it further.

Pilate wanted the situation to go away quietly. He knew that the religious leaders were behind the trouble before him (Mark 15:10). After being unable to win the crowd over to another solution, Pilate yielded to the voice of the CROWD and gave Jesus to be crucified (Mark 15:15).

Mark 15:16-21 speaks of the scourging that occurred prior to Jesus being sent to the cross. Remember that crucifixion was the most severe of punishments and the carrying out of the sentence was brutal. The violent nature of the crucifixion served as a deterrent to "would be" criminals.

Mark 15:22-37 details the "cross event." Jesus was stripped of all of his clothing (they cast lots for it). He was then nailed to the cross through both hands and feet. This is a public spectacle that was difficult to watch...and was comparatively more brutal in his case. While on the cross, He was insulted, mocked, and challenged. Any self-interest would have resulted in retaliation, yet Jesus had only one interest, that of completing the task of the Father...to satisfy the wrath of God against sin. In Mark 15:33, the text says that the day became dark from 12 noon to 3PM. At 3, Jesus cried out to God in Aramaic. "My God, My God...why have you forsaken Me.

The word "lama" which is translated "why" has more than one function. It is used at times as a question/interrogative. (ex: Why is this happening? Why am I here?, etc.) In this case, its use is DEMONSTRATIVE rather than interrogative. (Demonstrate/show why you have forsaken me.) Jesus is not crying out in a pitiful voice wondering how things got to this point...He is crying out, knowing that the end is coming... and asking the Father to show the world what this death has accomplished.

Mark 15:38 is the answer. When Jesus died, the veil which separated the presence of God from the people was torn in two from the top to the bottom. Now, there was nothing that separated the people from God. Before, only the priest could pass through the veil on behalf of the people. Now, Jesus becomes the gateway (the new veil) to God and people approach God, not through a priest and a veil, but through our new High Priest (Jesus) and His sacrifice alone. Even the statement of the Gentile Centurion, upons seeing how Jesus died, declared that Jesus was the "Son of God" (Mark 15:40).

Mark 15:42-47 details how Joseph, a member of the rulers and a believer in Christ received permission to bury Jesus before the Sabbath (which began at 6PM on Friday night.) This is the first day in the tomb (Friday). No one could attend to Jesus on the Sabbath (since work was prohibited on the Sabbath/ Saturday- the second day). We will resume the story tomorrow...with the following morning, Sunday- the third day.

Proverbs 25:4 is the takeaway today. Becoming what God has called us to be is more often about what we take away (the impurities/dross), than about what we add. Sometimes we think we NEED to learn more, add more, do more...when what God really wants to do is subtract some elements in our lives that are impurities. The Holy Spirit is all about surfacing stuff we need to forsake. Becoming a useful vessel is, in many cases, simply yielding and forsaking, leaving the useful vessel part for Jesus to mold and shape.

Take Two: Mark 14, Proverbs 24

2009-02-24T05:54:00.003-06:00

At Simon's home in Bethany, the disciples were having dinner. Mary came in and broke open her alabaster jar of perfume and anointed Jesus with it (Mark 14:1-3). This caused quite a stir since it was common for a "common person" in Jesus' day, to save up all of her life for her burial perfume. What she poured out cost around 300 denarii (1 years wages for a common laborer). In our state (Florida), the minimum wage is presently $7.21/hr. So, based on a 40 hour work week, the amount in today's terms is right at $15,000. Not only was it costly, but the perfume was saved so that a body could be covered with it after death. The perfume would cover the stench produced as the body decomposed, since there was no practice for preservation. (Now you know why Martha was concerned when Jesus told them to re-open Lazarus' grave! She thought that the body would already be decaying and that the smell would be overwhelming.)

So Mary's gift was not only one of great expense, but also one of great humility (Mark 14:4-9). As such, her act is an ongoing testimony for all of us. This is the model of devotion, humility, sacrifice...WORSHIP that we are given as an example.

In Mark 14:12-26 we see the last passover and its evolution to the Lord's Supper. The bread that Jesus broke was the piece of unleaven bread which is hidden in the beginning of the meal and rediscovered/found at the end of the meal. In the same way that the bread was hidden and then came to light again, so Jesus' Body would be buried and resurrected. (This is My Body...takes on new significiance). The Cup was the Cup of Blessing which is the last cup of the passover. Jesus said that the blessing of God was the New Covenant in His Blood.

In Mark 14:27-51, we see Jesus' prophesy that the disciples would all abandon Him. Peter protests, but ultimately does exactly as Jesus stated. Notice though, that the disciples never intended to fail Christ. They did not set out with limited commitment. They were absolutely committed in their strength; however, their strength was insufficient for the task.

Jesus' "mock" trial and Peter's denial is recorded in Mark 14:53-72. Much confusion has come about through the years over verse 71. Some believe that when Peter "cursed," that he used profanity. Not so. He emphatically denied Jesus and swore by a curse (i.e. "I swear this, and if I am lying, may I lose everything that I have, -or- may I die the death of a beggar"). The point is not his choice of words, but that he progressively denied even knowing Jesus to the point of the strongest and most emphatic denial possible.

(Interesting to me that Jesus knew this in advance, told Peter in advance, and chose Peter anyway to be the powerful preacher of Pentecost.)

Proverbs 24:17-18 is the takeaway today. I was reminded in reading this how we often take "disagreement" personally. Someone told me this week that he was going to work against a particular politician in the next election (in a couple of years). I wondered how one could pray effectively for this leader and support any of his decisions in the future if he has already decided BASED ON ONE VOTE that the man is unworthy of his support. I disagreed with the vote as well...but does it have to be personal? The official's vote is just one of many wrong votes...if God's people do not intercede for him and beg God to convict his heart and guide him in the paths of righteousness. Did this man become our enemy? Is He evil? Are we to hope for his failure...by not praying for his success and usefulness in this season? We are called to think differently and to weep with the calamity that befalls those who live outside of the blessing of God.

Take Two: Mark 13, Proverbs 23

2009-02-23T05:52:00.003-06:00

Chapter 13 is a brief teaching on the "tribulation" or "great tribulation." In Eschatology (study of "end times"), the tribulation period precedes the Second Coming of Christ. The subject came up because the disciple commented on how magnificent the temple was (Mark 13:1-2). Jesus told them that it would be utterly destroyed. That was hard to reconcile since it was an impressive building. Not like a church you may meet in now. It was huge...with incredible stone walls and magnificent decor. To put it in perspective, it would be like someone telling you that one day "Mt. Rushmore" will be leveled and there will be no hint of a President's face anywhere. (Kind of hard to get our heads around that).

Some of the disciples (Peter and Andrew, James and John) asked Jesus when this amazing feat would occur that He just spoke of. (Mark 13:3-4). Jesus told them that there would be many "false starts" or "missed cues" about the beginning of the tribulation (Mark 13:5-8). He seems to be saying that a number of people would falsely believe that the tribulation had come...or that some would seek to gain notoriety by claiming they knew when it was coming. (How true it is...anyone remember Y2K...for example?)

Jesus said that before the end would come, the tribulation would intensify and it would be a crime to be a Christian/witness. This persecution of believers would not stomp out the movement...since Christ proclaimed that the gospel will be preached to all nations/people group/ethnic peoples), (Mark 13:10). Further, the turmoil and strife will intensify until relatives are turning one another in to find relief or to gain an upper hand (Mark 13:11-13). Many will think that the times are futile...but those who endure will be saved (v.13).

Mark 13:14-19 describes the time of the anti-Christ (a world figure/messiah-type person) who will organize the people against God and against things of God, particularly the Jew. This person will ultimately lead an effort to exterminate Christians and Jews from the planet and will set himself up as god...arguably in the temple in Jerusalem (v.14). It may seem that his reign is everlasting and that hope will never come, but Christ tells the disciples that God has intentionally set a limit (42 months) on this one's power. His reign will end when Christ Himself comes again to make war against him (Mark 13:24-27).

Remember, the disciples wanted to know "when" this would occur. Jesus gives them the answer, both in parable and directly. They are to discern the times (as they discern the producing of fruit on the fig tree) (Mark 13:28-32). Just as you can look at a tree and know with some accuracy "about" when it will bear fruit...one should be able to observe the times and do likewise.

Mark 13:33-37 is Jesus telling the disciples that they will not know in advance exactly when. They are to be as a watchman awaiting the return of his master. Every day that goes by when the master has not yet arrived, should intensify the anticipation and cause them to be more expectant and aware of the hour. So...they are to be on the alert!

The anticipation of Christ's return was a rallying point for these early followers. As such, they were vibrant and zealous witnesses of Christ. They pursued the mission and did not cling too tightly to what they had...believeing that they would be leaving it behind soon, as they were gathered to be with Jesus. I wonder (at times) if that is not the issue with the church today. Could it be that we don't "really" believe in a soon coming Jesus? Is it that we think that since it has been so long...that we have an infinite amount of time to settle up and prepare? The disciples knew that each passing hour meant one less hour before His coming. They lived as children waiting on Christmas...10 days to go! 9 days to go! 8 days to go!....

Proverbs 23:4 is the takeaway today. The verse is not an admonition against providing for oneself or one's family. It is an admonition against living for things. Things are necessary...and things are even good. Things bring comfort and pleasure. However, things are not a reason to live. Things have an allure to them that draws us away from that which is important. I tell people all the time to avoid that which tempts them to sin. If that is lust...stay off the beach. If that is food...stay away from restaurants. If that is shopping...shop online. If that is...well you get the point. When we desire wealth...we have tendency to take our eyes of that which is truly important. Soon...we have been lured away from what was meaningful, and left only with things that can never truly satisfy.

Take Two: Mark 12, Proverbs 22

2009-02-22T05:33:00.003-06:00

In the opening parable in the chapter, Jesus teaches of the coming judgment of those who were poor stewards of the vineyard (Mark 12:1-12). This parable was given in the hearing of the Pharisees and they fully understood that Jesus was speaking to and about them. They took what was given them, the world as a vineyard, which was intended to produce from the vine for the vineyard owner (God). After rejecting the servants of the Owner/God, they ultimately killed the Son of the Owner/God. Had they finally accomplished their task? No. The Vineyard Owner was coming again to exercise judgment and give the vineyard to others whom He chose (Mark 12:9).

In Mark 12:13-17, Jesus is confronted by some who would try to trick Him into a public statement of anarchy. He recognized them for that they were and responded in a way that made them marvel.

Mark 12:18-27 is a picture of the Sadducees. They were devout religious people who did not believe in the resurrection. They present one of the theological questions that "justified" for them why there was no resurrection. Since there could be no answer (in their mind) that was consistent with their understanding of God's Word, then there must not be a resurrection. Jesus' response was simplistic in that He told them that they had too narrow of a view of the Kingdom.

It is funny...I have had to answer this question for some "Baptists" over the years. They thought of marriage as "the point." They considered that divorce and remarriage...or marrying after being widowed or a widower would create some type of "domestic" disturbance in heaven. The truth is...marriage on this earth is a wonderful institution/covenant which foreshadows the ultimate marriage between a Christ-follower and the Christ. We know one another in heaven...but we are so enamored with the Lord, that He is our only focus. He is the Point!

Mark 12:28-34 contains Jesus' teaching on the greatest commandment. Mark 12:35-40 is a strong afront toward the scribes. Jesus points out an apparent inconsistency in the approach of the scribes. The great king, King David, would have a throne that lasted forever; yet, David called the Messiah (in the Spirit), who was his descendent, "Lord." David did not take a position of superiority, but one of humility. Jesus was pointing out that if the scribes "truly" understood the nature of God and the calling of God's people, they would not walk about as elitists, but as humble servants (Mark 12:38-40).
THIS IS A POINT OF WARNING/APPLICATION: Sometimes Christians can begin to look at the world as though "we have arrived" or that "we are 'chosen'," or that we are somehow better off than others. The nature of being a Christ-follower is not one of superiority and pridefulness, but one of humility before God and service in the world.

This is seen in the final parable of the chapter (Mark 12:41-44). Jesus calls the disciples to observe that a widow has given two pennies to the temple treasury. He then tells them that she has given more than anyone since she gave from her poverty (all that she had), while others had given from their abundance (from their comfort/excess only). The giving was related to the heart and not the amount. The credit was based on the heart position and not the size of the gift. The HEART was observed by the level of sacrifice of the giver. It was NOT POSSIBLE for those who gave from their surplus to claim that they loved God so much that they gave large amounts of money to Him. Jesus said they gave less than the widow. In God's economy, the level of sacrifice is directly tied to the level of devotion. No sacrifice, no devotion. Limited sacrifice, limited devotion. Total sacrifice (regardless of amount) is total devotion.

Proverbs 22:2 is the takeaway today. As I read this, especially in reflection of the principle taught above, I am reminded that God is God of both the rich and the poor. He does not love or value one more than the other. We cannot say that He blesses the rich more than the poor. God does not respect/choose one man over another in this way. God does entrust people as stewards of His creation. He does entrust people with a Stewardship of His Mission...a divine cooperation. Often times (not always), wealth is a function of stewardship. As Lord of all...God has the same rights to the wealth of the rich man as He does the poor man.

Take Two: Mark 11, Proverbs 21

2009-02-21T06:10:00.003-06:00

Chapter 11 begins the final section of this gospel. Almost 40% of Mark's gospel is dedicated to "Passion Week;" that is, the week preceeding the crucifixion and Resurrection. From the amount of detail displayed here in this gospel, it is clear that Mark is emphasizing that this is the main point of Jesus' earthly ministry. He gives no attention to Jesus' life before His baptism. He summarizes three years in ten chapters. He focuses on the last week of Jesus life, death, and resurrection in five chapters. Brooks gives us a good summary of the timeline for the week:

Unlike the previous part of the Gospel, the passion narrative is characterized
by specific time references. At its beginning the events are set forth as having
taken place on three distinct days: 11:1–11, 12–19, 20ff. No indication is given
in 11:27–13:37 of where the third day ended. The next indication of time is in
14:1, which states that when the Passover was “two days away” the authorities
conspired further against Jesus. The following day preparation was made for the
Passover meal (14:12), and it was eaten that evening (14:17). The crucifixion
took place the next morning (15:1, 25) and the death and burial that afternoon
(15:33, 42). The day of the crucifixion was the day of preparation for the
Sabbath (15:42), i.e., Friday. The resurrection took place on the day after the
Sabbath (16:1), i.e., Sunday.
{James A. Brooks, vol. 23, Mark, electronic e., Logos Library System; The New American Commentary (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 2001, c1991), 176.}

The timeline helps keep the week in perspective. Mark 11:1-11 is the entry to the city that we celebrate as Palm Sunday. Here we see Jesus' prophesy and instructions to the disciples...right down to the colt's location and what to say.

In Mark 11:12-14, (Monday) Jesus cursed the "fig tree" that had its fullness of leaves but no fruit. The implication is a prophesy against the religion of the Pharisees. Mark 11:20-26 is a record the next day (Tuesday), when the party traveled that way again and the tree was withered. As unusual as it was for the tree to have fullness of foliage and no fruit, it was also unusual for it to have withered in a day. Peter points this out and Jesus tells him that the ingredient is faith.

Unfortunately, we live in a world where "health, wealth, and prosperity preaching" demands that I stop and explain a bit. Passages like this (according to some) place the accomplishment of events squarely on the measure of faith of the one asking. If you truly believe, God will do it. This is a mischaracterization of God's Word which happens when we try to take individual verses and isolate them from the rest of Scripture. This is why I constantly prompt our church to study the Word and develop a theology from the Scriptures.

The relationship of faith and answered prayer has everything to do with knowing who God is, what He desires to see done, and agreeing with Him in asking for it. We never propose something to God in prayer that He has not thought of or has a particular desire for. Thank God that He doesn't always answer the prayers that I pray. Sometimes my prayers are not for the "best" things. This does not mean I go around praying generic prayers, "God, let your will be done...whatever that is." (There are times in which I do pray this way, but it is the exception, not the norm.) Thank God that His answers do not depend on whether I have sterling faith or not (See Mark 9:14-29). Faith is essential. We must believe that God is able and that He has a purpose/plan, and that He answers the prayers of His people. We, however, are not the key to the answer...God ALONE is the key.

How do I explain the Mark passage? Jesus discerned that the Father wanted to demonstrate the futility of the religious practice of the Pharisees. Discerning this, He pronounced a curse on the tree and it was carried out...demonstrating EXACTLY what the Father desired. (See John 5:19, John 14:10-12).

Mark 11:27-33 closes the chapter. Jesus was causing a "stir" in Jerusalem and the religious leaders wanted it stopped. They tried again to trip Him up. Jesus answered in a characteristic manner. They asked by whose authority He was acting. He replied by confronting them with their own unbelief. They refused to give an honest answer, so He refused to answer them.

Proverbs 21:31 is the takeaway today. The partnership in victory is a cooperation. Man prepares...and God delivers. If the horse were never prepared, there is no reason to suspect that God would bring victory. If God does not bring the victory, there is no reason to believe that man's preparation will be sufficient. It is a divine cooperation.

Take Two: Mark 10, Proverbs 20

2009-02-20T07:34:00.004-06:00

Did I mention that Mark goes fast? I had to read the chapter a couple of times this morning. It is like trying to take a "sip" from a fire hydrant!

In Mark 10:1-12 Jesus answers the Pharisees on the subject of divorce. If you read this and thought His answer was a bit ambiguous, consider the context. We miss it without a little background. The Pharisees were typically divided into two "camps" on the subject. One group believed that a man could divorce his wife for displeasing him. They were very subjective. It could be that she "let herself go" in appearance, stopped cleaning the house, watched too much "Oprah" or that she wrecked the car. Any reason...if it was important to the man...it was good enough. The second camp held to a more rigid understanding of the text. They held that divorce was only "legal"/valid when she had committed sexual immorality. (The Greek word- Porneia, where we get the English-pornography). This may include any sexual infidelity...whether homosexuality, adultery, etc.

The goal of the Pharisees was to get Jesus to commit to one side or the other-- thus alienating the other camp. {The best way to destroy a guy...is to divide his "support base" until he is in the minority...then take him out. }

Jesus hit them in the stomach though. He changed the question. He stated that they were asking when it was legal, when the real question was why they would even pursue it when God made marriage an indissoluable union (i.e. a one way ticket, a forever promise, etc.). Jesus pointed out that the Mosaic provision for a Certificate was only given when the hearts of the people were so hardened (a product of sin) that they would not yield to God. The Certificate of divorce was a protection measure to insure that the woman would not be abandoned. (She had little standing in community and was dependent for livelihood on her husband. If he did not provide, without the Certificate...she could not even remarry...thus she was doomed.)

Sometimes, we as Christians ask the wrong questions too. Do I tithe on the gross or the net? How much drinking is allowed as "social" before it becomes drunkenness? How many times do I have to forgive? At what point is enough, enough...in my marriage?

Mark 10:17-31 is an interesting exchange with the rich young ruler (Pharisee). (One of my friends thinks this is the Apostle Paul early on. Interesting thought...but I don't know.) The ruler wanted to know what he had to do to be righteous with God. When Jesus gave him the commandments, the ruler claimed that he had kept them perfectly. Jesus pressed the issue to the "heart" of the matter. The man placed great trust in his own possessions. Jesus told him to forsake those things and trust God alone to provide. The man went away sorrowful.

We as Christians often do the same thing in our journey. We are confronted with sin and consider forsaking it; but, we decide that we cannot live without the comfort that the sin provides. So, we go away sorrowful. As believer though...rest assured...God will not let you get away with that. (Speaking both biblically and experientially!) He will not allow you and I to become content with a second rate salvation. He will chip away at our defenses and give incentive...until we are willing to yield that area of our lives. At that point, we are ready to move forward and experience the "abundant life" of John 10:10.

Mark 10:32-45 speaks of the coming crucifixion. Jesus tells His disciples exactly what is coming and how. This will serve to strengthen their faith and affirm that things did not "get out of hand" at Calvary...but were the expressed and intended will of God. Beginning in Mark 10:35-45, Jesus speaks of the model of servant leadership. Non-believers DEMAND authority. Believers YIELD authority.

(As a sidenote...this is why I "shake my head" many times when people refuse to follow the direction that a church's leadership takes. To refuse to submit is to act as non-believers. Non-believers demand their rights, while believers yield under lawful authority and depend on God to defend them. So when someone says, "I am leaving because I don't like so-and-so, or I can't submit to the direction the pastor is going" They are saying that they are demanding their rights. My rights...and the rights of every believer...were nailed to the cross at Calvary. I gave all that I had there...both my sin and my right to make demands. When Jesus said, Take up your cross and follow Me, He did not give me a vote. This was His way...and I either yielded or rebelled. There was no middle ground.)

The chapter closes with "blind Bart" receiving his sight. (Mark 10:46-52) He "pitched a fit" (as my Grandmother was fond of saying) when he heard that Jesus was coming into town. Even though people tried to quiet him, he pressed on until Jesus called him forward. He knew what he wanted (sight) and he asked for it. Jesus granted it according to his faith.

There is no "receiving from Jesus" until we know what we want (i.e. we are convicted of our sin and broken fellowship with God resulting from it), and ask Him for it (i.e. ask for forgiveness and yield to His Lordship in our lives) in faith.

Proverbs 20:18 is the takeaway today. There is wisdom in planning. We are called to live disciplined lives. As people who have emotions, we must be all too aware that, at times, we can become "driven" by our emotions. This is why it is important to seek guidance and accountability (assistance) when making big decisions in our lives. We don't need to seek counsel on whether or not to lie, to confront evil...or to tithe, go to church, or read the Bible. The Scripture is clear. We do need (often times) to seek counsel before running out and doing something that is less than clear (when to get married, job changes, major purchases, educational pursuits, etc.). Is that a "legal" requirement? NO! But it has proven to be a step wisely taken for me. Sometimes I miss my own blindspots...and God has placed people around me to help me see them...and avoid the pitfalls hidden from my sight by those blindspots.

Grace,

Take Two: Mark 9, Proverbs 19

2009-02-19T05:56:00.003-06:00

Chapter 9 begins with the transfiguration. Mark 9:2-8 relates that Jesus went up the mountain with his inner circle of disciples (Peter, James, and John). This was a special time of revelation for these men, since represented on the mountain were Moses (the Law) and Elijah (the Prophets)...and Jesus (the Son of God). In Mark 9:5, Peter decides to break the silence...mostly because he was overwhelmed and did not know what to say. He told Jesus that it was good to be there and that they should make three tabernacles...one for each (Moses, Elijah, and Jesus).

The tabernacle is the place of meeting with God. While each man represented a different era (or if you are a student of Eschatology {i.e. "end-times theology"}, different "dispensations") there is something unique about Jesus. The testimony from God (Mark 9:7) is that Jesus is uniquely God's Son and the purveyor of truth on relating to God. Both Elijah and Moses were honored...but Jesus was the One God pointed to and instructed Peter to listen to. This is because Jesus was the substance of the message preached in the Law and in the Prophets. He is God's Messiah.

Mark 9:9-13 speaks of John the Baptist. He is the one who came in the spirit of Elijah. The disciples wanted to know how to process their new information with what had been taught by the Scribes. Jesus did not discount the information taught by the Scribes...only related that they missed the "person" that their teachings pointed to.

Mark 9:14-29 gives an interesting account of a healing Jesus performed. Let me make a quick observation. I have met and "read" people who are convinced that this is a boy who had epilepsy and not a demon. They explain it in very scientific ways and then condescend to tell me that it is only explained as "demonic" because they did not have the knowledge to call it what it was. They are wrong in their assessment. How can I be so arrogant as to call them "wrong?" Simply...because the Word of God says the boy had a demon and that Jesus cast it out and ordered it never to return again. We can either believe some dude 2000 years after the event...or we can believe Jesus who was there.

Now, the significance of this account for me relates to both the time elapsed between Mark 9:20-25; and the faith exhibited by the boy's father. It seems that the boy experienced the seizure for some time (seconds or minutes) before Jesus interrupted. At least long enough for Jesus to have a conversation with the father. Jesus waited to heal the boy while He talked with the father about his belief. The father made one of the greatest statements on the human experience and our Godward response, "I believe...help my unbelief" (Mark 9:24). The disciples were a bit perplexed at the event, since they had tried unsuccessfully to cast out the demon. Jesus explained His success in Mark 9:29.

Whether you believe in "stubborn demons" or "prayerless disciples," one thing is certain...with Jesus all things are possible...for His glory!

I love the final exchanges of the chapter. In the midst of teaching on the resurrection (Mark 9:30-32) and teachings on holiness and discipleship (Mark 9:38-50), the disciples had a discussion on who was the "coolest" among them (Mark 9:33-37). These guys give me hope. God is into regular people with regular stuff and regular struggles. He meets us where we are and then refuses to leave us there.

Proverbs 19:27 is the takeaway today. Wisdom and understanding come with applied discipline. As we discipline ourselves to pursue knowledge and understanding, we develop wisdom. When we stop being intentional, we drift away from the Word of knowledge. Are you disciplined in your approach to God and His Word? Or, do you come and go as you feel "moved" along the way. Discipline is not bad...it is our friend.

Take Two: Mark 8, Proverbs 18

2009-02-18T06:20:00.003-06:00

As we look at this chapter, there are two primary sections or movements in it. Mark 8:1-26 gives more miracles that Jesus performs, while Mark 8:27-9:1 begins a shift toward discipleship and Messianic teaching.

Bear in mind two things. First, scholars agree that Mark is not a "chronological account" of the life and ministry of Jesus. It is a collection of events and is true...but the arrangement was not "necessarily" chronological. As such, it is fair to ask why the arrangement appears as it does. What is Mark's point in arranging the material (under the inspiration fo the Holy Spirit) as he has? Second, this collection of events in Mk 8:1-30 parallels the structure of events in Mk 6:31-7:37. James Brooks (NAC) noted that this is probably due to Mark's accentuating that Jesus' disciples were dull of hearing and had to be instructed twice. This might also explain the inclusion of the only account where Jesus had a two-stage healing (Mark 8:22-25).

In Mark 8:1-10 the second mass feeding is recorded. It is a different account than the feeding of 5,000, even though some have tried to say that it is simply a modified re-telling. (Jesus refers to the events distinctively. See Mark 8:19-21). Some have proposed that the reason for the two accounts is that the 5,000 involved a Jewish audience, while the 4,000 involved a predominantly Gentile audience (since He was likely in the region of Decapolis). The text is not specific but this seems like a reasonable assumption.

After the feeding. The next story is the Pharisees' request for a sign from God (heaven) (Mark 8:11-13). Jesus had performed many miracles and His power was well attested even among the Pharisees. The fact that they asked for "another" sign is consistent with Mark's purpose to show that even the disciples did not "get it" (Mark 8:14-21) the first time around.

Mark 8:27-30 contains Peter's confession of Christ (parallels Matthew 16). This is a turning point in the gospel. Jesus then explains to the disciples plainly that He will suffer and die (Mark 8:31-33). Peter rebukes Jesus over the message.

NOTICE: In one breath he confesses Christ, and in the next, He rebukes Christ as being mistaken about what would come to pass. WHAT! Remember though...Peter was looking at the Messiah through the lens of what he had always been taught about the Messiah. His presuppositions were dictating his understanding. Jesus corrects Peter.

Every one of us look at God through a particular lens. Usually, that lens is formed by the teaching and training we have received. Ultimately...the authority of Jesus was....Jesus. Ultimately, our authority on God is...God. Regardless of what we may have learned before or are reading now...the only true authority on who God is...is God; and, the only reliable record of who God is...is God's Word. (Not this preacher, nor John Piper, nor your favorite post-modern commentator.) What does the Word say? Why does the Word say it? What does it mean to me? The Word is unchanging. It is not defined by our interpretation or preaching. The Word is the Word...even if we are wrong in our understanding of it. To say (as many are becoming fond of doing today) that we "feel" that Jesus is different than we read clearly in the Scriptures...is simply and absolutely wrong.

Mark 8:34-9:1 closes out the section with the cost of discipleship. Being a "Christian" (or as I prefer, a Christ-follower/disciple/fully devoted follower of Jesus Christ), requires an unconditional surrender to the will of God and an intentional pursuit of Jesus as Lord. It is not to be stagnant, contently backslidden, or intentionally rebellious. If you KNOW you are "not right" with God...and you know what needs to change to become "right" with God...yet you choose to ignore the actions...then you need to question who you are following...because it is not Christ. (See Matthew 7, especially Mt 7:21-23).

It is one thing to be "thick" and not fully grasp God's will. It is quite another to set oneself up as a rebel who defies God's will. The former...could make you an immature disciple. The latter reveals the need for a heart change.

Proverbs 18:2 is the takeaway today. Some people want to spend more time talking than listening. I meet them every week. They walk away from a message having heard something that simply affirms what they already believe. They claim to be full of understanding and believe that they have arrived. They confidently claim that someone else is wrong because they do not agree with them. Here is what I have come to understand along my journey of walking with Jesus...I am more aware of my own ignorance today...than ever in my life. Much more than when I started in ministry as a teacher. Then, I was assured (in my mind) that I had the answers. Now, I am amazed at how God answers my questions in ways I never expected or deserved. I spend more time now trying to understand others than ever before. I am still discerning and decisive. Just because someone has a different idea...doesn't mean (necessarily) that I am wrong...but it just may be the case.

Grace,

Take Two: Mark 7, Proverbs 17

2009-02-17T07:17:00.002-06:00

Mark 7 opens with an extended teaching on traditions taking the place of relationship. The Pharisees are offended by the fact that Jesus' disciples did not observe the ritual washings prior to eating their meal (Mark 7:1-5). It is not that the disciples ate with dirty hands per se, but that they did not go through the ceremony of dipping and wiping their hands to demonstrate that they were ceremonially clean.

A couple of issues that Jesus addresses. The thrust of His teaching is not aimed at religion as though religion were bad. Religion (defined as a system or process one employees to relate to, worship, and commune with God) is not bad in itself. The Pharisees had begun to look to the system as the means to save, rather than the God that the system pointed to.

This is why Jesus spoke the next verses. The Pharisees had elevated the traditions of the elders (religious practices) to the level of doctrines; in fact, the traditions had actually crowded out the doctrines of God. The Pharisees had "honored" God with their lips, but their hearts were not with Him (Mark 7:6-8). In fact, the Pharisees had even gone to the point of sacrificing the doctrines of God for the sake of their traditions.

In Mark 7:9-13, Jesus pointed out that the Pharisees had developed traditions that stated it was preferable to give to the Lord in all cases, even when that meant neglecting the care of ones parents. The Pharisees taught that you could be released from the obligation to care for your parents if you took the means which you would have cared for them and called it "corban" (meaning - given to God). This was not in addition to God's instruction, but was opposed to it. SUch is the nature of rules and traditions if left unchecked.

This is why I do not promote a "total abstinence from alcohol" position as the only way of being righteous before God (for instance). I have no right to "add to" God's Word. It never states that we are to abstain totally from alcohol consumption. (Personally...I am a person who totally abstains because I never want to give a cause for offense...and drinking in my cultural context is always offensive to observers. I can even build a good case for why, in principle, drinking is ordinarily bad. I usually can argue a case from Philosophy as to why a Christian can glorify God in their lives better by not drinking than by drinking.) The point though...is that no one ever became righteous before God by drinking or not drinking. Jesus said that it is not what comes from the outside in that defiles us; rather, defilement before God is a heart issue (Mark 7:14-23).

The next story recorded gives us an example of the right "heart." A Gentile woman asks for help and Jesus rebuffs her and even seemingly insults her (Mark 7:24-27). The woman though...is persistent and does not offer any justification for her request. She merely asks Jesus to be merciful. She is as a beggar before Jesus...imploring Him to be merciful. In her begging, she acknowledges that it is only by God's mercy and grace that she has any hope. Jesus responds with grace according to her faith (Mark 7:28-30). Some of us would be better off if we quit reciting our resumes to Jesus and simply begged for Grace.

The chapter closes with an incredible miracle of Jesus healing a man who was deaf and mute. His method was a bit unorthodox...which tells me the recipient must have shown great faith to allow it (Mark 7:31-37). As a result, the people were blown away and wondered how Jesus could do all that He was doing. He could...because the Kingdom was at hand.

Proverbs 17:15 is the takeaway today. It is equally bad to call righteousness wicked...as it is to justify wickedness. Think that one through. There is a lot there. How do we justify wickedness?

Take Two: Mark 6, Proverbs 16

2009-02-16T05:38:00.003-06:00

Mark 6:1-6 relates an encounter that Jesus had with the people who knew him best for most of his life. Jesus returned to His hometown and began to teach there. The people became offended at his teaching because it was "different" than they were accustomed. As a result, they began to question "who does He think He is? We know this guy. He was a construction worker here." Jesus taught his disciples that there is a credibility gap that occurs when we are very familiar with a person. Someone said "familiarity breeds contempt." Truthfully speaking, we live in an age where we look for and expect authenticity. Sometimes though, we become too familiar with a person and their "authenticity." As a result, we start to ask the same questions that the townspeople asked here. Why should we listen to this person? He has as many "issues" as I do. Also, sometimes we become frustrated when our own family doesn't seem to understand and respond. Well...we are in pretty good company.

On the backside of pointing out the credibility problem among those most familiar, Mark records that Jesus sent out the disciples to preach the gospel (Mark 6:7-13). Catch the correlation. Some did not respond, but Jesus simply sent them disciples elsewhere. The proclamation did not change...only the audience....only the location.

The execution of John the Baptist and the rumors about "who Jesus could be" are recorded in Mark 6:14-32. From this story, what jumps out to me is that Herod never got past the conviction/weight of his own sin. After killing John the Baptizer (Baptist), He thought about him over and over. He even thought that Jesus may be the spirit of John the baptizer. Unresolved sin never just "goes away." It must be dealt with.

The feeding of 5,000 men (...not to mention the women and children) is recorded in Mark 6:33-43. I find it interesting that Jesus' compassionate response to the people (Mark 6:34), was to teach them the things of God and His Kingdom. Their greatest need was not food, the Roman government, taxes or the economy. Their greatest need was HOPE in the midst of life. Their greatest need was PURPOSE, so that life made sense in context.

The last two miracles (walking on water, Mark 6:45-52; and multiple healings, Mark 6:53-56) finish up the chapter. When you look at the chapter as a whole, Mark does not bury us in detail, but provides an overview of Jesus' impact and influence on others. Without question, Jesus is presented to us as unique. He is not an average teacher. He is not an elite philosopher. He is someone like the world has never seen. He is, in fact, God...even if people responded differently to Him.

Proverbs 16:2 is the takeaway today. A man can justify his own actions in a hundred different ways. We can redefine "is" to mean anything we want. However, our justification is not the final authority. It is the judgment of God who weighs the intent of the heart. Whether we do something perceived as good or something inherently bad, God still looks at the intent of the heart. This is the reason that we are called to leave judgment to the Lord.

Grace,

Take Two: Mark 5, Proverbs 15

2009-02-15T06:18:00.003-06:00

Chapter 5 is one of my favorites in this gospel. Jesus demonstrates His power (rule and reign) over both spirtual and physical matters...or if you prefer, natural and supernatural.

Mark 5:1-20 gives the story of the Gadarene/Gerasene demoniac. A man was so possessed with demons that he could no longer function in society (Mark 5:2-3). He lived in the rocky area near the sea there which was used for burials (a cemetery). He possessed superhuman strength due to the demon possesion and was constantly tortured mentally...something we infer based on his constant screaming and "cutting" of himself with rocks (Mark 5:4-6).

Notice that Jesus disembarked from the boat at this place. No good Jewish religious guy would ever hang out at a cemetery. Dead people were "unclean"; yet Jesus parked the boat there on purpose. When Jesus stepped out, the demoniac ran to him and bowed before him. The man is not the one controlling this action...it is the demons. (Notice...the first thing the supernatural beings--demons-- do when the King of the Kingdom steps out, is bow and beg.) (Mark 5:6-13).

I meet people who talk with me about their "battles" with the enemy. They speak of how the devil is really "wearing them out." I too have encountered the enemy. His tactics with me have never been to overpower me or to wrestle in a contest of strength. When he has succeeded in overcoming me, it has not been by power, but by enticement. He distracts or detours me. That's all. My great failures in life have been when I simply YIELDED to him and his enticement, not when I was overcome by his power. Why? Because He who is in me (the Holy Spirit) is greater than he who in in the world (the enemy). There is no need to do battle with the enemy. He knows his place. Whenever Jesus steps into a place, he simply bows and begs.

The event with the demoniac was pretty "crazy" for those who looked on. The herdsme who just watched their swine take a nosedive off of a cliff into the sea, ran to town and told people about Jesus. When the people arrived at the place where Jesus was, they found Him...but also found the "former" demoniac...now clothed, sitting with Jesus, and in complete control of himself (Mark 5:14-16). This so scared the townspeople, that they asked Jesus to leave (Mark 5:17). He obliged them. The man who was healed wanted to go too...but Jesus who was disinvited to stay in the region, sent his new "convert" to tell the story in the region. The man did so with passion (Mark 5:18-20).

Mark 5:21-43 contains two miracles. A synagogue official asks Jesus to heal his daughter. By the time Jesus arrives at the house where the girl is, she is already dead. When He pronounces that she will be fine, many of the people there (mourners and so forth) begin to laugh at him (Mark 5:39-40). Jairus and Mrs. Jairus do not laugh though. They chose to believe (Mark 5:36). Jesus called the girl back from the dead and she came (Mark 5:41-42).

In the midst of the travel to Jairus' home, another miracle occured (Mark 5:25-34). A woman with an incurable medical condition, a hemorage, came to Jesus to seek healing. She had already exhausted every avenue of help available (Mark 5:26). She decided to touch Jesus' garment, believing that by simply touching it, she would be healed...and was (Mark 5:27-29). Jesus confronts her and then declares that she is healed because she chose to believe (Mark 5:31-34).

In each of these cases, Jesus demonstrated His power over insurmountable circumstances. The key to His healing in each case was simply His power and the willingness to believe on the part of the beneficiary. The Kingdom was in their midst. The King was ushering in a new era. The benefits were available for all who would believe.

One of the Scriptural truths we have today is knowing that the Lord is the same today as He has ever been. His character and power are unchanging. What troubles you? Take it to Him...believing...and receive the benefit of the King's Kingdom.

Proverbs 15:8 is the takeaway today. The most religious act by an unrighteous person is despised in the sight of God. The prayer (alone) of a righteous person honors God. We cannot "do" anything to impress God. In fact, we diminish His grace and greatness by trying to earn our righteousness. To simply call on Him brings delight, when done in the right spirit. The Scripture is not saying that religious acts are bad (sacrifice, worship, piety, etc.; only that they are of less worth than a prayer offered with humility.) Jesus teaches this principle to the Pharisees..."Do these things, without leaving the weightier things undone."

Take Two: Mark 4, Proverbs 14

2009-02-14T06:12:00.004-06:00

Mark 4 is somewhat unique in the gospel because he offers an extended discourse on parables. Not much explanation is given on each one (compared to the other gospels); however, what he does say is instructive for us regarding the Kingdom.

Mark 4:1-9 describes the parable of the sower. It is fairly commonly known to those familiar with the NT (Appearing also in MT 13 and Lk 8). The parable was commonly understood to the hearers and was intentionally vague in meaning. This called the hearer to reflect on the meaning and commit to the message.

In first century Palestine, the practice of planting involved scattering the seed and then plowing it under. (We do it in reverse in our context today). The main emphasis in on the produce of the seed, not on the sowing. The sower is the same with all of the soils. The seed is the same with all of the soils. The condition of the soil/environment as the "receptor" of the sown seed is the main differentiation that corrolates with the produce. As you apply the parable to you individually, you may decide that the best way to experience abundant life is to flee from the enemy (Mark 4:15), To drive deep your roots (Mark 4:17), and to eliminate the weeds (worries of the age) in your life so as not to choke out the produce (Mark 4:19). To do so seems to make the environment right for abundant produce.

It seems though that the primary focus (bearing in mind the context provided by the other parables in the section) is on the reliability of the coming Kingdom. This seems to be less about individual activity as it is an explanation for why some reject the message and how their doing so...does not negate the reality of the coming Kingdom. Notice that the seed sometimes sprouts up without the sowers knowledge (Mark 4:26-29). Notice also that the seed, while small in its inception, becomes a large (proportionately speaking) plant which provides for many (Mark 4:30-32). Notice also that this seems to be the thrust of Jesus explanation on why He teaches in parables (Mark 4:10-12).

Just to clarify a question that may arise on Mark 4:10-12, let me say that the focus is (again) on the fruitfulness of the kingdom...the produce...not on an "attempt" to prevent the produce. Some read v. 11-12 and focus on the mystery...as though keeping the Kingdom mysterious was Jesus' point. Some would even cite this as a proof text claiming that God intentionally wants some to not understand the message. This conclusion is not consistent with the Scripture elsewhere...and Scripture cannot be inconsistent; therefore, our conclusions must be reevaluated so as to develop ones that ARE consistent with Jesus in other places.

V. 12 begins with the Greek word hina, which is often translated correctly as "so that" and indicates purpose. For example...something happens, so that, something else will happen. The word though, in the original language is more functional than that. Much like our English words, it can have other connotations...depending on the context. A better way to translate hina in this verse is to render it "as a result." For example, something happens and as a result, something else occurred. Brooks speaks of this in his commentary:

Some have sought to avoid the conclusion that Jesus used parables to hide the truth by claiming that Mark or someone before him mistranslated Jesus’ Aramaic word “so that” rather than “who.” This is a possible explanation, but a better one focuses on the meaning of the quotation from Isa 6:9–10. God told the prophet to deliver his message even though it would be rejected. The seeing without perceiving, the hearing without understanding, and the failure to turn and be forgiven (Isaiah wrote “be healed”) were the result, not the purpose, of his message. So it was also with the parables of Jesus. Therefore the Greek word hina (translated “so that” in the NIV) at the beginning of v. 12 ought to be translated “as a result.” This is a well-established meaning. Jesus did not speak in parables for the purpose of withholding truth from anyone; but the result of his parables, the rest of his teaching, and even his miracles was that most did not understand and respond positively. He did speak in parables to provoke thought and invite commitment. Therefore parables are more than mere illustrations. They constitute spiritual tests that separate those who understand and believe from those who do not. Still another possibility is to translate hina “that is” (cf. its use in 9:12). This rendering and the translation “as a result” do not differ greatly. (James A. Brooks, vol. 23, Mark, electronic ed., Logos Library System; The New American Commentary (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 2001, c1991), 83.)

This conclusion is also consistent with the NT elsewhere (1 John 2:2, John 3:16-17, 2 Peter 3:9-10, etc.).

To wrap it up, the Kingdom of God is mysterious. How it becomes and expands, has far more to do with God (and far less to do with us) than we are often comfortable with. God is the "giver" of the Word...and the "power" behind the Word taking root and bearing fruit. That being said, we are given the privilege and responsibility as "sowers" of the Word. We are not necessarily responsible for the fruit...but are responsible for preparing the soil, sowing the seed, pulling the weeds and praising God for the harvest.

Proverbs 14:4 is the takeaway today. I have commented on this verse in the past but it struck me again today. I am so glad to pastor a church with cares less about a "clean manger" than they do having a "full manger." When people who have been estranged from Christ...come to Christ...their lives are often "messy." We should expect nothing less. The messiness should no more be a source of guilt than a newborn should feel guilty for not being able to walk. Certainly we should not resolve to stay "messy," but God is awesome...in that He takes "messy" and fixes it as His Word is heard and understood. May we never come to a place where we are embarrassed by the messiness of the stalls, as long as we are seeing new oxen joining us on the journey.

Grace,

Take Two: Mark 3, Proverbs 13

2009-02-13T06:21:00.003-06:00

Mark 3 opens with Jesus healing a man on the Sabbath (Mark 3:1-6). As Jesus went into the temple, there was a man with a physical infirmity, but the Pharisees had their attention focused on what Jesus was doing. They were not focused on the worship of the Creator, or the needs of the man...but on what the other "religious guy (Jesus)" was doing in the room.

Their goal was to affirm their belief that Jesus was a bad guy and would break the Jewish Law. The only healing that was permitted on the Sabbath was that which saved a life. Jesus used the event as a teachable moment. The motives of the Pharisees were revealed when Jesus asked them a question which they would have to agree to...and they did not respond (Mark 3:4). He wanted to know from them, was it right to do good...or to do evil?

Obviously it was right to do good and wrong to do evil. Jesus is pointing out that to do nothing (not to do good) was to, in fact, do evil. They could not respond without becoming trapped in their own words, or repenting. So, they said nothing. Jesus became angry at their self-serving hardness of heart. Rather than be proven wrong, they would simply sit by and wait for him to act. They were faced with a crossroads of decision...and they refused to step across. So, Jesus healed the man anyway. This infuriated the Pharisees...to the point...that they went out and "conspired with" the Herodians against Him. (These two groups had nothing in common...except their common enemy, Jesus.)

Jesus' fame continued to spread (Mark 3:7-12). He continued to work miracles of healing and exorcism...not because it was his ministry, but because it authenticated his message and bore witness to the claim, "the Kingdom of God is at hand." Many of those who benefitted from His healing were not true disciples. They were not there to become Christ-followers. They simply wanted to be healed. Jesus healed them anyway.

Something that struck me was this: Jesus never sought out these people to demonstrate his goodness toward them. You don't find where He had a game plan to go find people who did not care about the Kingdom...in order to bless and heal them. These folks found Him and He ministered to them. SOMETIMES today, we find ourselves going out in search of opportunities to do nice things for people unsolicited. We might even do it without presenting the gospel (or the intention of presenting the gospel) and say that we are just "being the Body" of Christ. Are we? Were we commanded to seek out opportunities to do social ministry without the gospel? Where? When? How?

Jesus certainly did "social ministry," but always in the context of proclaiming the Kingdom (the Rule and Reign of God in the heart...and the challenge for men to repent and follow God.)

One last observation in the chapter: Responding to the accusation that Jesus' power (as opposed to the claimed power of the Pharisees) came from Satan rather than God (Mark 3:20-23), Jesus told a parable.

Mark 3:24-30 is the parable where Jesus proposes the principle that if the physical infirmities of the people are the result of Satan (as the Pharisees proposed and was commonly accepted), then Jesus' power had to be from God...since Satan could not stand against himself and survive. The Pharisees had to either admit their flawed theology of sickness (the sins of a person or his ancestors are the cause of his illness.- See John 9:1-3), or agree that Jesus was working according to God's power. They again responded with hardness and Jesus introduces the sin unto death.

What is the sin unto death? It is essentially the sin of unbelief. The Pharisees would rather attribute Jesus' actions to some other power than to admit their failure and believe in Him. The verb tense indicates a perpetual state of unbelief. It is not a one time confession, 'I do not believe in God." It is an ongoing attitude of explaining away God's actions so as not to acknowledge Christ as Lord. I am asked from time to time, "Pastor, have I committed the 'blasphemy of the Holy Spirit sin' in rejecting Christ through the years?" Here is the answer I have become pretty comfortable with. IF YOU ARE ASKING THE QUESTION, IT IS NOT TOO LATE FOR YOU NOW. If you go on asking the question, it may become too late. All sin is forgiven to those who repent and believe.

The chapter closes with Mark 3:31-35. Here, the family of Jesus comes to get Him. He makes an incredible statement about allegiences. For a Christ-follower, the closest connections and familial relationships exist between those who know and do the will of God. The bond between believers is stronger than even the bond of blood relatives. This seems hard...and should not be "pressed" too far; but, for those who have ever experienced the bond of Christian family...it makes perfect sense.

Proverbs 13:24 is the takeaway today. Discipline is an act of love. To withhold discipline or to apply it inconsistently is to act with hate/"unlovingly" toward a son. To love our children requires at times that we desire their good character over their popular award of "best friend." When they grow up, they really respect and give the "best friend" award...only this time, it really means something.

Grace,

Take Two: Mark 2, Proverbs 12

2009-02-12T06:10:00.003-06:00

Mark 2:1-12 give the story of Jesus healing the paralyzed man who was lowered from the roof. Bear in mind that He has amassed great popularity among the people and when he returned to the city, they surrounded him again. He was teaching them in a house and it was an OPEN meeting...(since there were scribes and Pharisees there). The crowd was so densely packed that the friends could not carry the paralyzed man to Jesus. So, they climbed onto the roof and began to remove the roof. Their goal was to lower their friend to Jesus.

That is a lot of work. Many would have said..."maybe next time," or "sorry dude...let's go down the street where Rabbi fluffyhead is preaching." Others would have expressed their inability to get to Jesus as simply "God's will." These friends starting taking the roof off of a man's house.

I am not sure who lived there, but he was probably inside when the roof was removed. I imagine he had to wonder who was on the roof and why they were installing a skylight! IS THIS NOT WEIRD? (Honestly, I don't know if I would take someone's roof off to get my friend to Jesus!)

Anyway, they did and Jesus gave a statement that was a veiled reference to His deity. The Scribes said that only God could forgive sins (Mark 2:7). Jesus said that so they would know that He could do it (and wasn't some weirdo), He would also heal the man physically (Mark 2:10-11).

The rest of the chapter is a succession of encounters Jesus had with people (mostly religious experts) where He redefined for them what it meant to relate to God. They did not understand why He would hang out with sinners (if He was a religious man). He said, "That's the point of my coming" (Mark 2:15-17). They wanted to know why His disciples didn't observe the "fasts" of he day. He said that there would be a time for that, but this wasn't it (Mark 2:18-20). Apparently some thought that the coming Kingdom would fit into the "shell/old wineskin" of Judaism...but Jesus said that you put new wine in new wineskin.

Let me pause here. Some today say that we (Christ-followers) should abandon our "church" practices and move toward something that is less "institutional" or "structured"...like Jesus taught. They cite verses like this. Jesus ushered in a new era of full knowledge of God's Messiah. People (prior to the cross) were saved by believing in God's coming Messiah. After the Cross, people called on the Name of God's Messiah, Jesus, who came. We still live in that era. We don't need new wineskin...because we don't have any new wine. We simply need to do with the wineskin that we have...what Jesus told us to in the first place (Acts 1.8; Mt 28:18-20, etc.).

The religious dudes wanted to know why the disciples did not observe the work restrictions on the Sabbath (by not plucking heads of grain when walking through a grainfield) (Mark 2:23-28). They thought that God was pleased in their worship when they would observe the Sabbath with this form of rigidity. Jesus told them that God was not laying these burdens on them but that they were self-imposed. The Sabbath was not give to be a burden, but so that man would be blessed in the Lord of the Sabbath.

When you summarize all of these ideas, you find a pretty common theme. The religious experts of the day had developed and (basically) adhered to a form of worship that was devoid of relationship. It could be observed without even adding people into the mix. Jesus pointed out that God cared less about their ceremony than He did their mission.

I wonder how many times people I know (even me at times) exchange the mission for some activity of busy-ness? Is our worship of God about form or substance? Are we more concerned with meeting God or with a crying baby, temperature of the room, cell phone going off, or whether the Service will be over by 12:00? One way to guarantee that everything works as predicted...ban all people from worship. Never get involved in or invested in the lives of people. If we do, everything will run like clockwork...and we can hang out with stuffy little Pharisees who care more about the form than the substance. As for me...I hope I never become satisfied with the form and always seek the substance, the reality, the Truth of who God is and why God has put me here...that I may know Him and make Him known.

Proverbs 12:11 is the takeaway today. The first part of the verse speaks of how we are called to provide for ourselves. God's provision can come in the form of "manna" from heaven; however, He is just as much the "Provider" when our provision comes from our own hands. It is not a statement of faith to sit on the sofa and wait for God to provide through some miracle. Laziness is not some virtue or statement of spirituality...it is just laziness. The second part of the verse shows that we must be intentional and diligent to focus on the important things. Someone once made the statement that it is possible for a person to "get too busy making a living to make a life." It is also possible to be too busy doing less important things...and not ever accomplish that which is very important.

Grace,

Take Two: Mark 1, Proverbs 11

2009-02-11T05:57:00.003-06:00

As we begin our study of this gospel, a couple of background things may assist us. Early church tradition credits Peter as the primary source of information that is chronicled here by the author (possibly John Mark...however he is not identified). Tradition also holds that the gospel was written in Rome, and most likely between AD 64-65 (since there is only veiled inference to persecution...a prominent feature after Nero AD 65). If Peter is a primary source, then it occurred after AD 62 (when Peter arrived in Rome).

Mark is one of the synoptic gospels (meaning it agrees with Matthew and Luke) in purpose and material addressed. Contemporary scholars generally hold to the hypothesis that Mark was the first gospel written, though there is no universal consensus. (NOTE: Several early church fathers held to a Matthean priority).

95% of the material covered in Mark is also covered in Matthew or Luke. Only 5% of the material addressed is unique to this gospel (which is another reason scholars believe it was the first to be written). What we do know...is that the gospel of Mark was in circulation and being commented on by the early second century (AD 120, by Papias).

Most scholars believe that Mark had non-Jewish readers in mind when writing this gospel. Perhaps, if written in Rome, the presence/ concentration of Gentiles would have influenced this approach.

Mark begins with this statement: "The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God" (Mk 1.1). Christ rarely referred to Himself in Messianic or Deistic "terms," however, at times He did. Mark begins with the conclusion He has drawn and widely represented the thoughts of firsthand witnesses (like Peter and the Apostles)... that Jesus was, in fact, the Son of God. It is clear from Mark 1.2-8, that He is presented as the Savior/Messiah as well. Mark 1.9-11 bears witness to God's unique affirmation of Jesus as His own Son and in His pleasure in Christ's ministry and life. Jesus is not pictured as a highly gifted or evolved teacher...but as the unique Son of God and Savior of the World.

Mark 1.14-15 gives the thrust of the message that Jesus preached: The Kingdom of God is at hand (defined...by me elsewhere...as the rule and reign of Christ in the hearts of men), so, repent and believe. F0r more on this, see the recent messages I preached 2/1/09 and 2/8/09 specifically. They are available on this website or on the sermon archives at http://www.calvaryofpensacola.org/audio.html .

The call to action and the response of those hearing the teaching of Jesus was one of "change." Notice that Simon and Andrew "left their nets" (Mark 1.18), and James and John "left their father" to follow Jesus (Mark 1.20). The uniqueness of Christ and his teaching in the field of religious guys is obvious in the response of those in the synagogue (Mark 1.21-28). His teaching was affirmed by the presence of supernatural power (i.e. the effecting of miracles). Further, He spoke with absolute authority...not as a scholar citing other scholars for evidence (Mark 1.22).

His powerful preaching and the working of miracles caused His fame to spread widely and drew throngs of people from all of the surrounding areas. We can draw two things from this:

First, there were great needs all around Him in the lives of people and the contemporary religion of the people did not need those needs.
Second, Though His message was one of absolute surrender (a hard message in today's times), people willingly responded because they wanted desperately to find relief for that which afflicted them.

Some say that the thrust of the gospel today should focus on healing and social justice. These people cite the miracles worked by Jesus as a primary reason for their view. While we ARE called to heal and to speak for those who are most vulnerable in society (AND MUST DO MORE OF IT), we must never forget that the primary responsibility of Christ followers is to follow after Christ. He said that His purpose was to proclaim the gospel (the good news of God's Salvation...and the coming of the Kingdom...along with the challenge to repent and believe) everywhere. His preaching was primary...not his social ministry. Social ministry gives evidence of the Kingdom and gives an opening for the gospel, but is not the primary responsibility of the church or of Christ followers (Mark 1:35-38).

To effectively communicate the gospel and call others to repentance and belief...we must be willing to minister to people where they are. This means close connection with those afflicted by the enemy and suffering. We must be willing to touch the "lepers" of the world...while proclaiming God's Salvation (Mark 1:39-45).

I will confess that I struggle to maintain balance in these areas in my own life. To preach only --makes the message empty. To heal only--only makes the condemned "more comfortable". Both proclamation and ministry are required to effectively communicate the coming of the Kingdom of God.

Proverbs 11:13 is the takeaway. Our character is revealed...not in what we say (so to speak) but in what we do. One cannot go about claiming to be trustworthy and acting as a talebearer ( a gossip). Trustworthy people control their tongues and protect the dignity of others by concealing matters that are dealt with. Do you "bury" things...or display them over and over...even when they have been dealt with time and again? The answer reveals character.

Take Two: Genesis 50, Proverbs 10

2009-02-10T05:44:00.003-06:00

Before I begin, let me commend you who have followed along with me during this study of Genesis. As we discussed in the beginning (pun intended), Genesis is foundational to a proper understanding of who God is and how God has worked in history to bring about His unfailing purpose. The book does not answer every question one could have...but it answers every question that we "must know" to believe in the God of Creation and to place our faith in Him. Starting tomorrow, we will be in the New Testament again, studying the Gospel of Mark (This will be our first study of one of the gospels together).

Genesis 50 gives the details of the burial of Jacob, as well as some discussion of relationships between the sons of Israel until Joseph's death. The primary purpose of this last chapter is to show the end of the Patriarchal history and is a set up for the events of Exodus (where Moses steps onto the scene).

Joseph received permission from Pharoah to leave Egypt temporarily for the purpose of burying his father in Canaan (Gen 50:1-6). What is surprising is how much support the Egyptians gave him in accompanying Joseph to Canaan (Gen 50:7-11). It is significant to see how one life had touched so many others. Joseph did not ask for any of his circumstances...but he credited God with sovereignty and relied on God's purpose. As a result, Joseph served the Egyptians with integrity and gained a name for himself. The traveling of the elders with him is significant in that the elders represented the entire nation of Egypt mourning for this foreigner turned Egyptian.

This causes me to question...I wonder if I impact others to the degree that they would mourn with me...that they would walk across the desert for days to acompany me to bury my father. This kind of influence in the lives of people is not "positional," but comes when we truly pour our lives into others. How about you? Do those you work with and work for (or work for you)...feel so connected to you that they would walk across the desert to support and love you in times of difficulty? If so...you are right on track. If not, you know the objective. Not to gain the support of the people; rather, to serve them to the degree that the supoort comes naturally.

After Israel's death, the brothers became nervous. They thought that perhaps Joseph had only acted kindly toward them out of respect and response to their father. (Funny isn't it...how we project our views and viewpoints on others...) They conspire to tell Jospeh that Jacob wanted him (Joseph) to forgive them for the wrong they had done to him (Gen 50:15-17). Joseph had forgiven them and reassured them again that he had found a greater sense of purpose in his circumstances (Gen 50:18-21). God had used him greatly where he was and Joseph knew that his PURPOSE fulfilled far outweighted the PRICE paid.

There is one other nugget in that section. Joseph reminds us that God alone is the One who (and the only One qualified) judges men (Gen 50:19). "Am I in God's place?" he asked rhetorically. [Man... if I could have back the time I have invested in seeking out and thinking about the justice for wrongs I have endured, I would be so blessed. I have spent many days and hours dwelling on the wrongs and not just trusting in the God who sees all and acts justly always.]

Gen 50:22-26 records that at the age of 110, Joseph made his brothers swear to take his bones back to Canaan when God brought them up out of Egypt. He had confidence in the promise of God to give Canaan as a possession. (This also serves to explain why Israelites in Moses' day (Exodus) were still carrying around an "osuary" (i.e. bone box/coffin) with Joseph's remains.

Proverbs 10:19 is the takeaway today. Believe it or not...I really try to apply this proverb. I have been accused of only giving short answers to questions from time to time. Usually the one observing this is commenting that I am acting like a politician (only committing to what I have to). Truthfully though, I just know that the more I talk...the more damage I am prone to do. (Too much experience in that area). Anyway, while not perfectly, I try to give the answers to the questions asked and not give much more than that. This is not a "political" maneuver...or a "rhetorical" device; rather, it is an attempt to not mess up by saying too much.

Grace,

Take Two: Genesis 49, Proverbs 9

2009-02-09T06:03:00.003-06:00

Genesis 49 details the blessings given by Jacob to his sons, while on his deathbed. The chapter ends with Jacob's death. As you read this chapter, a couple of things stand out immediately. I won't comment on every aspect of the chapter, since the imagery presented would take volumes; however, I do want to draw attention to some dominant characteristics.

In Gen 49:1-2 we see two major functions. First, we see the paternal authority and structure of the father calling together the sons. The family/clan/tribal unit is a major "deal" in Jewish culture. The great patriarch calling together the sons is a reflection of the respect and authority attributed to Jacob/Israel. Second, we also see that the blessings are prophetic as Jacob stated that he would tell them of the things that were to come.

Note: I have used the term "blessing" because the text does. Admittedly, some of what is pronounced in the chapter is more of a "curse" or "indictment" than a blessing. (That is actually one of the features I like about the OT. It gives you the facts--"warts and all.")

Gen 49:3-4 stands out because, while Reuben was the firstborn and was entitled to the rights of the firstborn, Jacob prophesies the loss of the "first" privileges (Gen 49:4) because he defiled and dishonored his father by having sexual relations with Jacob's concubine (Gen 35:22).

Gen 49:5-7 deals with Levi and Simeon who are cursed for their lack of self-control and wanton display of anger (Gen 34:25-30). They exacted revenge on their own, outside of the cultural or paternal expectations. As a result, they would lose their land blessing. (Recall that Levites received cities within the territories of the other tribes and Simeonites were given land within the boundaries of the tribe of Judah).

Judah receives a prophesy of honor, power and preeminence among the tribes (Gen 49:8-12). Most Jewish and Christian interpreters find the prophesy for the Davidic kingdom (Gen 49:10) and ultimately the Messianic Kingdom (Kingdom of God) in these verses. Gen 49:11-12 are a picture of abundance and blessing.

The lesser known tribes of Zebulun, Issachar, Dan, Gad, Asher, and Naphtali are listed in Gen 49:14-21. While less is said of them, they are listed by name in the passage.

Joseph is given prominence and blessing in Gen 49:22-26. The picture is blessing and recognition that rivals that of Judah; however, one should not take this to diminish the fact that Judah is the tribe from whom "the Ruler" (i.e. David and then Jesus) would come. Joseph is distinguished without being exalted above the distinction of being a ruler...which resides in Judah.

Benjamin, the youngest, is listed in Gen 49:27. He is well known for the courage, competence, zeal, and valor in battle. (See also 1 Chr 8:40).

Notice in Gen 49:28, the blessing for each fo the 12 was unique and fitting for the person. There was not a blanket statement. Each one was dealt with according to the prophesy and according to his deeds. Such is the same even today as God deals with His people...you and I. In Gen 49:29-33, Jacob charged his sons to bury him with Abraham in Canaan and then he died.

As we consider how to apply this chapter, I am mindful that each of the 12 tribes were named. Each was blessed as part of the family of Jacob. Each was also dealt with and blessed in their particular and unique role within the family. Even the seemingly less significant had a part to play. Paul's imagery of the church as Christ's Body comes to my mind. As such, each of us are dealt with...not according to an ideal...but uniquely and specifically according to our actions. Our role in the Body is a blessing...even if seemingly less significant than another role. In the Body, there is order, structure, and complementary blessing for the good of the entire Body. The collective (the Body, the clan) is higher priority than the individual (individual believer/ tribe).

Proverbs 9:6 is the takeaway. Living the "abundant life" or experiencing the "blessing" of life...involves two things that are really one in the same. We must turn from unwise living (foolishness) and turn toward understanding (applied wisdom). We cannot simply turn from living unwisely. We must also turn to something. We cannot live wisely and unwisely at the same time. We cannot experience rebellion and blessing at the same time. They must be a forsaking and an appropriating. As we forsake foolishness and pursue wisdom/understanding, we begin the journey toward blessing.

Grace.

Take Two: Genesis 48, Proverbs 8

2009-02-08T06:11:00.004-06:00

The remaining chapters of Genesis are deathbed pronouncements of Jacob/Israel. Gen 48 refers to the adoption of Ephraim and Manasseh (Joseph's sons in Egypt) by Israel. This is significant for several reasons (not the least of which relates to their status as part of the 12 tribes). This blessing and adoption is set in context after Joseph goes to Jacob (Gen 48:1-2).

Jacob recounts his vision/encounter with God at Bethel (Luz) and the promise that God made to him of land and descendants (Gen 48:3). This blessing (as you will recall) shows the unbroken line of blessing given to Abraham, then Isaac, then Jacob, and to Jacob's descendants. The blessing is that of the Lord...not the choosing of Jacob (or any of the Patriarchs...which is the point).

In Gen 48:5, the first announcement of adoption. This is not to eliminate Joseph from the line; rather, it was to bestow the share of inheritance which belong to Jacob's sons...in full portion to these two grandsons. Joseph prepares the boys (to bring them close) so that his firstborn (Manasseh) would receive the right hand blessing (Gen 48:11-14). Jacob crosses his hands so that the right hand blessing was bestowed on the younger. Joseph protests the special blessing being given to the younger of the two (should remind of a picture of Ishmael/Isaac, and Esau/Jacob encounter), but Jacob is resolute (Gen 49:17-20).

Jacob then blesses Joseph and prophesies that Joseph will return to the land of his fathers (Gen 48:21-22). While Joseph would not go back to take possession, this statement becomes the basis for Joseph's admonition to his people to take his bones with them when they leave Egypt and bury him in Canaan (Josh 24:32).

The last two verses struck me unusually. I imagine for Joseph, it would be easy to become comfortable in Pharoah's land. It was the only home he ever felt accepted and discovered purpose (since childhood). He had a wife, family, good job, and prestige there. Yet, Israel reminds him that the land where he dwells is not his home. As it is applied, I see a picture of heaven and how we are not to become too comfortable in this world. I also see an application pertaining to our living places on earth. Yes we may have family and roots here...but God has given a place for us too. It may be here...but it may be Africa, New York, Alaska, or Indonesia. The key is not our comfort, or our reasoning, but God divine blessing and assignment for us. I can also see this "place" as a mindset rather than a geographical location. We may find ourselves (intellectually/practically/emotionally) in a particular place...but God has a destination for us that may be different than where we are. WILL WE SEIZE IT?

Proverbs 8:13 is the takeaway today. To say that we fear/reverence/respect/love God is to also say that we HATE everything that is in opposition to God. We cannot love/embrace/desire the things that are opposed to God and still FEAR Him. To fear God is to love what He loves, do what He does, avoid that which is opposed to Him...and thus glorify God in the process! May God raise up in me a righteous indignation against the evil in the world...and ESPECIALLY against the evil in my own heart (whether pride, insolence, arrogance, or otherwise)...that I might forsake it and demonstrate that I FEAR GOD.

Grace,

Take Two: Genesis 47, Proverbs 7

2009-02-07T05:10:00.003-06:00

Quick post today...as I am already behind for meeting my party downstairs to go to the Conference.

In Gen 47, we see the provision of God...through Pharoah...for the Israel and his people (Gen 47:12). Who would have thought? (Only God...)

A good observation I noted from the passage:
Gen 47:15-16 gives us a principle of work and reward. Joseph could have just given away the provisions...but did not. Why? I believe it is because the principle in Proverbs is true. If a man does not work...he should not eat. It was important for the people and for their dignity (and appreciation) that they work for what they would receive. To give it away, implies that the value of what they would receive was waning.

The final thought in in Gen 47:29-31. Jacob wanted a promise that he would rest with his fathers in Canaan. Jospeh made the promise and it is incredibly important in a developing theology of blessing and land covenant.

Proverbs 7:2 is the takeaway today. We are told to treat the wisdom of God as the "apple (pupil) of our eye." I don't know of any part of our bodies that we instinctively protect with more vigilance than our eyes. May we guard the wisdom of God with the same care.

Take Two: Genesis 46, Proverbs 6

2009-02-06T05:31:00.003-06:00

In Genesis 46, we find that Israel moved to Beersheba and there God spoke to him (Gen 46:2-4). God instructed Israel to leave Canaan and to proceed to Egypt. God promised His continuing presence in Egypt where He would make Israel a great nation. He alos promised to bring him up again out of Egypt (with the inference being to return his people to the land of promise).

The descendents of Israel who went to Egypt were 66 (noti including Jacob/Israel's wives)...and they were joined by Joseph and his two sons, plus Jacob comes to the number of 70. These descendents are listed in Gen 46:8-27.

The reunion of Israel and Joseph occurs in Goshen (Gen 46:28-30). Jospeh gives instructions on how to answer Pharoah if asked as to their occupation (31-34). The response would allow Israel's household to remain in Goshen as long as necessary.

God's provision is clear and evident...though by today's standards, it could be called coincidence for certain. God's promise of giving the land of Canaan is not negated here since God promises to return his people from Egypt. For those who have eyes to see...God is at work providing for and blessing His people in a way that magnifies Himself and rings true to His character. We...if we're honest...can see God's hand at work in our lives...if only we allow ourselves to see Him as He is...not only as we expect and desire Him to be.

Proverbs 6:22 is the takeaway today. These are bold promises for giving attention to the Word of God. It guides in our daily lives, protects us at our most vulnerable times, and gives us direction when all things are new to us. If we believe such claims as these...obviously we learn and apply God's Word daily to our lives.

Grace,

Take Two: Genesis 45, Proverbs 5

2009-02-05T05:51:00.004-06:00

Finally! For 2 days I have been waiting for this chapter! Remember that at the end of Gen 44, Judah is trying to take Benjamin's place. He has passionately laid out the case that leaving Benjamin behind will kill Jacob/Israel. It is too much. Jospeh breaks and begins to weep so loudly that even the household of Pharoah hears (Gen 45:1-2). Joseph sends everyone away except the brothers and then reveals his identity (Gen 45:3).

The brothers are "dismayed." In other words, this new revelation is too far outside of their "box" to grasp and buy into. Joseph called them to come closer (and they did). He then reassured them that he did not hold ill-will against them for their actions toward him (Gen 45:5).

NOTE: What we are about to see is what happens when we look back on circumstances with God-eyes and see the bigger picture (the "meta-narrative") of life.

Joseph tells them that God was not caught by surprise by the brother's actions of selling him into slavery. We see this in his discourse when he gives God the credit for sending him (Joseph) to Egypt (v.5,7,8) (Gen 45:5-8).

A couple of theological observations need to be made:

First, Joseph is not saying that God caused the evil actions of the brothers. God does not cause evil. He cannot be tempted nor does He tempt anyone (James 1:13-14).
Second, Joseph is not affirming or condoning the actions of his brothers. They acted in sinful malice toward him.
Third, Joseph is not minimizing the suffering he endured. It would be "way off base" to think that what Joseph endured was in some way less than significant. He went through the greatest difficulty imaginable.
Finally, Joseph IS saying that while all of these actions were taken by the brothers, and all of these consequences were real, God was not and is not surprised. God was working IN HISTORY to prepare for what the brothers would do and worked IN HISTORY to sustain Joseph in the midst of his suffering, in order to GLORIFY Himself and fulfill HIS PLAN for HIS PEOPLE. Joseph's suffering was FULLY KNOWN to God and FULLY ACCEPTABLE to GOD to GLORIFY HIM.

Now I know it is difficult to embrace a God who is glorified in the suffering/sacrifice of His people. Our culture and the weak image of contemporary Christianity tells us that God exists to bless us and make us comfortable in this life. It is as if we think God is a "cosmic bellhop" waiting at the concierge desk of our hotel to fluff our pillows and to recommend a good restaurant to eat at. If this life were ABOUT US...I would agree; however, this life is not ABOUT US. We are ABOUT HIM and all things exist for Him and by Him. Joseph caught a glimpse (probably after years of wrestling with his own hurt and anger,and thinking over in his mind how best to get revenge) of the "meta-narrative" and how he was chosen by God to be the instrument to save God's people and fulfill the historic and GOOD plan of God. What a privilege to be used of God to suffer for a cause! (Does that statement stretch anyone? Consider Acts 5:40-41; Acts 26:19-29; 1 Peter 1:6-9).

In every trial and overwhelming circumstance...try asking "what is God teaching me through this suffering...and, how is God using this suffering to magnify Himself and expand His Kingdom?" These questions are more profitable than "why me?" They also lead to a more speedy resolution when we stop "kicking against the goads."

Proverbs 5:1-2 is the takeaway today. Pay attention to wisdom that you may act with proper discretion. The wisdom of God consists of two general approaches...those things to embrace and those things to avoid. We are well served to give heed to both. Both the warning and the encouragement serve to give us great reward in this life and the life to come.

Grace,

Take Two: Genesis 44, Proverbs 4

2009-02-04T06:05:00.004-06:00

The tension in the story builds to great proportions in this chapter. Jospeh sets the brothers up.

He orders the servants to fill the sacks of the brothers with grain and to return all of their money. He then tells them to hide his "silver cup" in the sack of the youngest, Benjamin (Gen 44:1-2). Soon after their departure, he sends a steward after the brothers and lodges the accusation that one of them has stolen the cup (Gen 44:4-5).

The brothers deny the crime and state that if the cup is found, the one who took it will die and the others will become Jospeph's slave. (This is not necessarily a statement of "righteousness," but is an emphatic, cultural way of saying "You're crazy!) The offer is countered and it is agreed that the one who possesses the cup will become Joseph's slave (Gen 44:9-10).

The cup is found with Benjamin and all of the brothers return to Joseph's house. Upon return, Judah presents all of the brothers as slaves, but Joseph tells them that he only wants Benjamin (Gen 44:14-16).

Judah then explains that to return to Jacob without Benjamin would result in Jacob's sorrow unto death (Gen 44:30-31). Judah begs to take Benjamin's place (Gen 44:34).

It seems that the goal of Joseph's deception is to determine if the brothers had come to value Benjamin's life. He wanted to know if they would simply sacrifice Benjamin for their own skin...or if they would deal with the situation in a way that would cost them personally. It is also possible that Joseph wanted them to grasp the pain involved in losing someone dear to them. He wanted them to grasp how costly it was for Jacob to lose Joseph in the first place. (Understanding the weight of sin guilt is a prerequisite to desiring and receiving forgiveness.)

(Granted...my observations here are somewhat speculative as I have tried to "get into" Joseph's head a bit. His motive doesn't seem to be revenge...so this solution seems plausible.)

All of this tension is resolved tomorrow...but don't read ahead.

Proverbs 4:26 is the takeaway today. The thrust of the verse is this. We do not have to establish our ways. It is not a task required of us to arrange for certain outcomes in life. The outcome of every situation is the Lord's to bring about. Our task is to "watch" where our feet go. This speaks of intentionality. It speaks of our intentional and diligent efforts to do daily what God has required, knowing that doing so will bring about the conclusion that God desires.

Chew on that for a second and then realize that this is groundbreaking for some. We don't have to discover the most strategic way to bring about a result. (This is not an indictment against planning). We are called to know and do the will of God in the daily decisions. If we do this...then God sets our course to glorify Him through bringing about the result...which we may be unable to see/grasp/ or embrace. So, what does God want you to do today? Know and do the will of God in everything.

Grace,

Take Two: Genesis 43, Proverbs 3

2009-02-03T05:57:00.004-06:00

Chapter 43 details the return to Egypt by the brothers. After the food ran out, Jacob sent them to Egypt again (Gen 43:1-2). Judah replied and stated that they could not return to Egypt without their youngest brother Benjamin (Gen 43:3-5). Judah guarantees his life for Benjamin's.

Jacob finally agrees and sends all of the brothers to Egypt to gather food. Upon arrival, they are told that they will eat at Joseph's house (Gen 43:16-18). This brought fear upon them and they considered that it must be a set up.

They began to explain immediately to Joseph how they had found their money in their sacks of grain when they left before and had not stolen anything (Gen 43:20-21). Joseph told them that he had given them back the money...but gave no further explanation other than it was from their God (Gen 43:23). He then returned Simeon to them.

[Don't you know that this was an interesting reunion? Simeon had been waiting for some time but the brothers never returned. I imagine that there was some explaining that needed to occur.]

Joseph fed the brothers and asked of Jacob's well being. He became emotional and had to leave the room to weep. After having gathered himself together, he washed his face and returned to the brothers to complete the charade.

All of the events were designed to keep the brothers on edge. They must have been more anxious than at any other time in their lives. They were completely without control and had to rely only on Joseph's mercy for their own welfare. This feeling in their "gut" must have caused great reflection on the events of the previous years. Perhaps they thought of their brother Joseph's plight. Perhaps they improved their prayer lives. No one really knows. All that is known is the charade is nearly over.

Proverbs 3:9-10 is the takeaway today. The verses remind me that following God means obedience by faith...then the blessing. Many people are willing (at least in conversation) to honor God after they have been blessed. Being a Christ follower means trusting and honoring him "knowing" that the blessing will come. It is obedience for righteousness sake alone. It is also a firm confidence in "knowing" that the blessing/provision is coming because God said so. No further evidence or guarantee is needed. Only the character of God.

What areas of your life are you in need of trusting God with? What place in your heart do you need to surrender? How will you respond to the call to obedience? Will you surrender and "know" that God is faithful...or hold out "knowing" that you sacrifice all blessing in doing so?

Grace,

Take Two: Genesis 42, Proverbs 2

2009-02-02T06:40:00.003-06:00

Gen 42 describes the travels of the brothers of Joseph to Egypt to buy grain since the famine was in Canaan also. Ten brothers made the journey to Egypt to buy grain. Benjamin was left behind with his father (Gen 42:3-4).

When the brothers approached Joseph, he recognized them but they did not recognize him. He accused them of being spies and placed them all in prison for 3 days. This was part of his cover story...not an act of vengeance (Gen 42:8-17).

After three days, Joseph went to the brothers in Egypt and told them to take their provisions, but leave one of the brothers with him as surety that they would return with Benjamin. Doing so would verify that their story was true. His rationale for treating them in this way was that he "feared God" (Gen 42:18-21). Joseph's actions toward them caused them great distress for now they would have to choose which brother to leave behind. This raised up the old memory of Joseph and their evil deeds toward him. They began to argue with one another that this was "bad karma" for the way they had treated Joseph (Gen 42:21-23). Their distress caused Joseph to cry (Gen 42:24), but he continued with the course of action. Joseph took Simeon as a prisoner and then gave grain to the other brothers and told them to return to Canaan. Once they brought Benjamin back, Simeon would be returned and they would be welcome to trade in Egypt (Gen 42:25-28).

Joseph also returned all of the money they brought to pay for the grain. This added an interesting wrinkle in the story. The meaning has been variously interpreted, but a couple of things seem clear. The continued possession of the money caused anxiety for the brothers. Perhaps they were concerned that, in addition to be accused of being spies, they would now be accused of theft. Or, it is possible that Jospeh wanted to bless them. I tend to rest in the belief that Joseph wanted them to have to go to Jaocb once again with their pockets full and missing a brother. All of the events seem to be designed to bring conviction for their past sins, while at the same time provide for their immediate needs.

The brothers go to Jacob and share the details. Jacob is conflicted and states his refusal to send Benjamin to Egypt (Gen 42:36-38). Jacob is suspicious that the brothers have conspired to gain at Jacob's loss. (The thing about a "con" is they believe that others are always acting as cons too). Jacob states that he intends to cut his losses because losing another son would be more than he could bear.

As I process this event, the "man" part of me wants to "fix it." I want to step in to correct the events and take away the pressure. However, there are some things in life that it is better for a person to wrestle through themselves. Sometimes God intends for the pressure to become overwhelming so that a person learns the value of what's before them. (Consider the sacrifice of Isaac, or the restoration of Peter in John 21). This set of events is intended to become overwhelming because God desires for it to be so. I know that doesn't fit within the scope of the "prosperity gospel" teaching, but it is true nonetheless.

Proverbs 2:21-22 is the takeaway today. It is the righteous who are established and experience blessing. The wicked (in contrast) are cut off and uprooted. It may not appear to be so at first glance, however, God does not lie. The wicked never prosper or gain ultimately. Their reward for but for a season, then judgment comes. The key to blessing and security is to always seek righteousness by knowing and doing the will of God in everything. Then HE secures and blesses...and no one can stop Him.

Grace,

Take Two: Genesis 41, Proverbs 1

2009-02-01T06:36:00.004-06:00

Chapter 41 is lengthy, but it details the turning point of the Joseph narrative and shows a glimpse of why Joseph has endured as he has. For one who can comprehend the "Sovereignty of God," this is a great testimony of how God is always at work "in time" to bring about an ultimate conclusion that glorifies Him.

Gen 41:1 begins by detailing Pharoah's dream. The dream (actually two dreams) revealed the coming seven years of abundance followed by seven years of famine (Gen 41:29-30). The dream was troubling to Pharoah because he did not comprehend the meaning. None of his magicians of sorcerors could interpret it either. Then the "chief cupbearer" came to Pharoah and revealed to him the details of his dream in prison (Gen 41:9-13). [ Don't gloss over this element of the story. The cupbearer "probably" experienced great anxiety in even bringing up the matter since it would remind Pharoah of the past...which was not very favorable to the cupbearer]

Pharoah sent for Joseph who told him that only "God" could reveal the interpretation and "God will give Pharoah a favorable answer" (Gen 41:15-16). [I hope you can hear the confidence in God that is embedded in this statement.]

Gen 41:38-45 details the installation of Joseph to the new office of second in command. Do you think that Joseph considered when he awoke that morning in jail...that he would go to bed that night in a palace with authority in all of Egypt second only to Pharoah?

Gen 41:46 tells us that Joseph was 30 when he was installed in office. {Meaning he was 28 when he first met the cupbearer (who called him a Hebrew youth, Gen 41:12) }. Joseph marries the wife that Pharoah gives him who is the daughter of Potiphara "priest of Heliopolis/On" (Gen 41:45). His name is also changed to "God speaks/He lives". These deatail reflect the "Egyptianizing" of Joseph...which makes him fit for the task before him in Egypt.

A POINT TO CONSIDER: Joseph would rule in Egypt for 80 years or so. How is it that God could/would bless him with such long life and success when he marries an Egyptian...much less the daughter of a prominent priest from the outskirts of Cairo? For those who hold to God's Sovereign protection and provision of Joseph in bringing about the conclusion of Joseph's prison sentence...does this create tension to think that God would have Joseph marry a non-Hebrew woman and bear children with her who become prominent in Hebrew history? (I have more questions than answers).

The setup for the next shift in Genesis is found at the end of this chapter (Gen 41:56-57) when the famine is upon, not only Egypt, but also the rest of the world.

Proverbs 1:7 is the takeaway today. As I read this today, I thought that the world is full of people who desire to gain wisdom. They want to know many things. Some pursue education and amass great knowledge...but never seem to be able to find peace in their lives. This is because Peace comes in direct proportion to knowledge of God. Wisdom comes in the "fear of the Lord"...or said another way: Wisdom is displayed as we align our lives with the Word of God, doing the will of God. All of the knowledge in the world...without a commitment to subjugate ourselves under the hand of God, results only in arrogance. Humility before God is the key to discovering wisdom and acting wisely.

Take Two: Genesis 40, Proverbs 31

2009-01-31T09:56:00.003-06:00

As we read this chapter of Genesis, the word that comes to mind for me is "faithful." Let me explain.

In the time that Joseph was imprisoned at the chief bodyguard's home, two additional high-profile prisoners joined him. One can imagine that Joseph was charged with overseeing many things in the jail, including these two new prisoners. Notice that they are put in the prison of the captain of the guards (chief bodyguard) (Gen 40:3). This is the same title given to Potiphar (Gen 39:1), so while not explicit, it seems that these are one in the same.

The crimes of the cupbearer and the baker are not given; however, they did offend Pharoah (Gen 40:1). In their time in prison, they both had dreams at the same time. (Coincidence...or providence?) Joseph revealed the interpretations of the two dreams correctly as the interpretations were given him by God (Gen 40:8). Even after promising to do so, the cupbearerer did not tell Pharoah about Joseph...as agreed (Gen 40:14,23). His negligence resulted in Jospeh spending 2 more years in prison.

I say that the text brings to mind "faithful" because Joseph would have acted differently (I think) if living in this age with the focus of many today. I can imagine that having risen to a place of responsibility in prison would have made it tempting to "mind his own business." After all, had not he been faithful to God to do all that was told him to this point...and only had prison to show for it? Perhaps he would think of a more "political" solution today.

Yet, Joseph did not look for a political solution. He did not seek after a self-serving resolution. He did what was right and requested that the cupbearer do him the favor of passing it along. God was teaching and preparing Joseph for the task at hand...and Joseph was faithful to do it.

Proverbs 31:4-5 is the takeaway. The admonition is to those in authority to not lose perspective or else they will pervert the rights of those who are afflicted. We can learn from this, by implication, that it is the purpose of those who are king or rule to watch over and protect those who are in need. In other words, those in authority are there to exercise oversight and stewardship so that they can minister to those who are afflicted. On one hand, we can apply this to the office of a "President" (as in our country). On the other hand...by implication it certainly applies to all of the "King's" ambassadors (i.e. Christians, Christ-followers) today who are given Kingdom authority so that we will assist, comfort, and help those who are in need. For this reason, we are to remain sober and in control.

Take Two: Genesis 39, Proverbs 30

2009-01-30T06:12:00.003-06:00

This is a story that is somewhat familiar to many. It deals with Joseph as the head servant at Potiphar's house. After being sold to the Ishmaelites, Joseph was taken to Egypt and sold again (Gen 39:1). This would/should be enough to really kill a man's attitude...but it seems that Joseph looked at his circumstance differently. He sought to make the most of the circumstance where he found himself...and God blessed him and the fruits of his efforts (Gen 39:2). As a result, Joseph gained recognition in his master's eyes because his master saw that "the Lord was with him" (Gen 39:3).

This is a good place to say that it is never even suggested that Potiphar was a believer or a follower of God. He was not a respecter of Joseph's God. He simply saw the results of Joseph's life and discerned that only God could cause it to come about (A discernment that may have come about in concert with Joseph's testimony of His God) . I wonder how many people look at the fruit in our lives and see that God is blessing our efforts? What seems to be implied in this text is that Joseph lived in a manner consistent with a believer in God. He did the right thing, in the right way, and gave credit to God for everything. As a result, those around him also gave credit to his God and he was, in fact, a powerful instrument in God's hand.

Joseph is propositioned by Potiphar's wife (Gen 39:7), and not once, but repeatedly (Gen 39:10). We have seen that the attitude toward sexual encounters in previous chapters was a bit more open than polite society allows...and Joseph hasn't seen any Hebrews he knew. He could have acted in any way he wanted and no one (except God) would have ever known. I can imagine the "self-talk" that may have occurred...recounting how the God of his fathers allowed him to be taken into slavery. Maybe it was just fine for Joseph to bed down with this woman! After all...who would ever know!

Joseph responded otherwise. He speaks of the responsibility entrusted to him by his master and how he could not/would not risk the trust invested (Gen 39:8-9). Joseph even connected the sin against his master...with a sin against God (Gen 39:9). IMAGINE...stealing from the government, lying to a co-worker, failing to fulfill a commitment to a friend...being a sin against God!

Joseph rebuffed the master's wife one time too many. She sets up a story and accuses him falsely and does it in a way that it is her husband's fault for bringing the Hebrew into the house (Gen 39:14, 17, 19).

Potiphar responded as any civilized husband. (No...he did not get his gun out of the truck!) He had Joseph imprisoned (Gen 39:20). Here, Joseph (who has not erred and is being used of God) simply continued to serve God IN HIS PRESENT CIRCUMSTANCE. His commitment to God is not based on convenience but conviction. God blesses Joseph in prison with a strong presence and evidence of trustworthiness (Gen 39:21-23). I am sure he must have been bummed to a degree along the way...but the fact is, he simply did the right thing because it was the right thing...and God blessed it. (God is making His strength and power known through the obedience and lifestyle of a willing believer...in a very practical way.)

Proverbs 30:5-6 is the takeaway today. God's Word is sure. It is tested and proven true. We do not need to add to it. When we try to add our "stuff" to God's Word and claim it is from Him...He will intentionally tear down our assertion and demonstrate the error of our claim.

God is sufficient. We must come to be satisfied and comfortable with that. In doing so, we see His glory manifested throughout the world!

Dealing with Criticism

2009-01-29T15:23:00.002-06:00

One of the things that there never seems to be a shortage of in life is criticism. By criticism, I mean the voicing of an opinion about a person, decision, or event…usually in a dissenting or disapproving way. Criticism, by nature, does not have to be negative; in fact, “constructive criticism” is a powerful tool for development and growth, both personally and professionally.

Leaders are always criticized. If you are in a position where you are responsible to lead, there are critics who will share with you many things about your leadership that they disagree with. This is part of leadership. Unfortunately, there is no circumstance that comes to mind where leaders are not criticized. Another way of saying this is to say, “You will never please all of the people all of the time.”

Public figures tend to elicit more criticism than others do. Public figures, whether the President of the United States, a public figure responsible for a large company or corporation, or even someone like me (a pastor), draw criticism.

In a ministry leadership role like that of pastor, criticism is both useful…and a major source of distraction and discouragement. Many times, I catch myself listening to the critics more than the cheerleaders. Someone this week sent me a “love note” (unsigned of course) about an experience he or she had at church. He arrived at church late and discovered that our exterior door on the rear of the property was locked. They apparently made it into the building, probably by the front door, because the love note was included in the stack of Connection Cards we collect following the worship service. In the midst of voicing his frustration, several implications were made. First, he implied that a mistake must have been made since he was locked out. Second, he implied that if this were not a mistake, then we (the church leadership) were presenting an unwelcoming image of Christ, our church, and God by locking people out. Finally, he charged us (the leadership) with being hurtful to him personally by making him feel as though he was “not welcome.”

The implications, more than the note, were somewhat “hurtful” and caused me to dwell on them for a couple of days. Then, I was reminded of a note given to me by an older and more seasoned pastor that put things in perspective. Rather than dwell on the criticism itself, I thought I would take a couple of minutes to speak of criticism principles and offer some guidelines to make criticism more reflective of Christ.

For those receiving criticism, the following principles should serve as a guide:

Assume there is a logical basis for the criticism. Assume that the person is sincere in his/her criticism and is basing it on a set of facts that he/she believes to be true. To understand the criticism (and to evaluate it) it is incumbent on us to understand what these deeply held beliefs, convictions, or cultural biases are.
Create a culture that encourages “positive”/ constructive criticism. Every healthy organization need a feedback process and every good leader must know that he does not know everything…so feedback is good, healthy, and valuable.
Seek out criticism in advance. If you have trusted counselors around you, ask them to “punch holes” in your idea beforehand. Then, present the answers to the criticism on the front –end, when you initially “pitch” the vision or idea. Criticism can be avoided and critics won over if you answer their “logical concerns” before they become concerns.
Admit when you are wrong. Every incident of criticism should be an opportunity to evaluate your position. Perhaps you are wrong, and if so, you have an incredible opportunity to admit it and MODEL a biblical response to criticism.
Do not take everything personally. Sometimes criticism is directed toward an outcome or a decision and is irrespective of the leader making the decision.
Do not retaliate. Critics are not enemies. Simply being critical or holding an alternate opinion does not make a person a candidate for the 10 most wanted list.
Do not seek to answer all criticism. Sometimes when you try to “prove” the criticism is wrong, you create a “martyr” of the critic. Other times, you cause the critic to “dig in his heels” on a matter that otherwise would have died out. Sometimes, it is just better to thank a person for sharing their viewpoint and then march forward. Further, there are times when a person’s opinion is clearly the minority. Let the criticism roll off or limit how much of it you will accept before stopping the critic.

These are good principles to guide a leader who is receiving criticism or will be receiving criticism…by nature of his position.

One other set of principles ought to guide the conversation…this time for the critic. If the goal of the criticism is evoke change or elicit a response, it is good to bear in mind certain principles that make the criticism more valid and the one critiqued…more receptive.

Start by giving the benefit of the doubt. Assume that the decision, vision, or direction was thought through before being presented to you. It may be the first you have heard of a decision, but it is not likely the first time it was considered by the leader.
Assume that there are facts that you do not yet know. Perhaps the leader is functioning according to a perspective that is more broad than your own. Precede your criticism with a fact-finding endeavor and seek to understand why a particular decision needed to be made…at least from the leader’s perspective.
Do not assume that the leader is functioning in a self-serving manner. This is related to the first principle. In every organization, it is possible that a leader might be corrupt or may be trying to meet his own needs. It also may be true that he is making decisions consistent with a greater need and this time…it is not as beneficial to you.
Do not take every decision personally. While we are all affected on a personal level by decisions, this does not mean that the decision was made with you “personally” in mind or to cause you “personal” anxiety.
Seek to help, not just to be heard. It is a good rule of thumb to consider alternatives to decisions and be willing to suggest them when offering criticism. It is one thing to complain about a matter; however, it is another thing altogether to offer criticism and alternatives.
Do not make the leader’s response a “litmus test” of friendship or value. No one but the leader has to give an account for the decision made. Sometimes decisions are made for reasons that you may not agree with. If the leader does not take your suggestion (even if it is a great one and better than his plan) do not assume he hates you and thinks you are incompetent. (Also, do not accuse him of being arrogant because he does not take your suggestion.)
Take your criticism directly to the person responsible. To carry criticism to twenty people who cannot do anything about it is not criticism, it is gossip and it is very destructive in the life of an organization.
Confine your criticism to the issue at hand. It is never a good idea to begin bringing up historical incidents or other opinions that are extraneous to the issue at hand. If you disagree with a decision, critique that decision, not the 20 other decision that you or someone else has disagreed with over the course of years.
Be willing to yield. Most people do not desire or are not called to be the leader. If there is more than one way to get to a destination, be willing to try it a way different from your preference. Perhaps it will work out as well or better. Perhaps it will be a learning experience for the leader. Either way, the leader will appreciate your willingness to try to make the direction work, especially if he knows it was not your idea to begin with.

There are probably many more principles that could inform us and guide the conversation, but hopefully these will serve as “food for thought” as you consider what it is to critique and be criticized in the future.

By the way, I guess it is only fair to share why the door was locked. Within a short time after the start of a worship service, all of the exterior entrances are locked except the main entrance. This is a security precaution and allows the security team to monitor activity on campus. This provides for a safer environment for the children (who meet near the rear entrance) since there is no concern of “bad guys” coming in from that direction. The decision reflects a policy that has been in place long before this pastor came to the church and reflects the best wisdom of several men who are responsible for insuring a safe environment for people to worship. It was never intended to be unwelcoming; however, I am sorry that the action was interpreted that way by whoever was affected. I wish this person had simply asked so that this could be explained. Perhaps they would have not felt unwelcomed as they were.

Comments, thoughts, and constructive criticism are always welcomed….

Grace,

Take Two: Genesis 38, Proverbs 29

2009-01-29T05:45:00.003-06:00

As you read chapter 38, you really have to take a deep breath and try to put yourself in the context of the writing. In today's culture, the events sound more like something from MTV reality shows than from the biblical code (Deut 25:5-10).

Gen 38:1 draws a connection to the events of Joseph's enslavement. Judah had the great idea to sell Joseph into slavery (Gen 37:26-27). This means that Israel's son was "taken down" (same word translated as "departed" in Gen 38:1) to Egypt. Now Judah "departed" his Father's house as well. One can see the unravelling of Israel's clan- thread by thread, and the recurring theme of the promise being jeopardized.

Gen 38:2-5 details that Judah practiced "exogamy" or the taking of a wife outside of the family tree. As with Esau, this is a behavior that is shared...both to explain the origin of tribes that are prominent in Jewish history, as well as to show the deep "issues" in Israel's clan, which work their way out through the rebellious acts we see here.

Gen 38:6-7 details the selection of a wife for Judah's firstborn son. The son, Er, is evil and God "takes his life." The word used here usually refers to the taking of a life by human execution; though it is clear that God is the judge who brings this about as judgment against evil.

Judah directed his second born son to fulfill the responsibility and take Er's wife as his own. Under the law, the firstborn son would bear the deceased brother's name (Deut 25:5-10), thus preserving the line. Onan refuses to impregnate his brother's wife (Gen 38:9). To give a descendent would mean that Onan would lose the prime share of inheritance (which becomes his as the oldest successor.) Again, this is shared to reveal the strife in the family.

Some commentators argue that Judah's next actions reveal that he held Tamar responsible (to some degree) for the death of his two sons. As such, Judah withholds his third (and final) son from marrying her (Gen 38:11-14). However, Judah had left Tamar as a widow in her father's house...meaning that she was legally on hold and prevented from marrying another. This made her a special class of people and vulnerable in society.

Tamar takes matters into her own hands. She deceives her father-in-law by posing as a prostitute and enticing him. He has relations with her and impregnates her (Gen 38:15-24). Upon being told that his daughter-in-law was pregnant (but not knowing that he was the father of her offspring), Judah acts self-righteously and orders her "execution." Tamar shows the staff that Judah had left to him (via a messenger) (Gen 38:25-26). Judah realizes the truth about Tamar's actions and is convicted of his own sin in the matter. He repents of the sin and withdraws the execution order, realizing that it is the consequence of his actions that is the underlying motivation.

Gen 38:27-30 details the birth of twins in similar fashion to the birth of Jacob and Esau. This imagery is intentional as a reminder to the reader. It is also significant to recall that both Perez and Zerah appear in the lineage/genealogy record of Jesus (Matt 1:3).

As we discern a theme in this twisted and sordid affair, it must be that all plans that are apart from the will of God lead to strife, suffering, and ultimately-- defeat. Judah sought to improve his life (and hurt his father) by selling off the "special son" Joseph. Riddled with guilt and unresolved bitterness, he strikes out on his own to make a new life. This resulted in the death of two sons, an embarrassing affair with his daughter-in-law, and...ultimately...his own repentance and character change. All could have been avoided by simply sticking with the plan and purpose of God, rather than trying to control the outcome. Everyone I know can learn from this... beginning with myself.

Proverbs 29:4 is the takeaway today. A couple of characters in the news come to mind...but the principle is the main focus. Justice (or doing the right thing) brings stability. Unrighteousness (i.e. selfish and self-serving actions) bring destruction. Whenever we do what is right because it is right...we find stability, growth, strength, and profit. Whenever we seek our own profit over what is right (no matter how we justify it), we set ourselves up for destruction.

Grace,

Take 2: Genesis 37, Proverbs 28

2009-01-28T06:23:00.003-06:00

Gen 37 picks up with a new toledoth regarding Jacob's descendents. If you recall, chapter 35 ended by naming the sons of Israel/Jacob. Then chapter 36 gives the history of Esau. Now we jump back to the promised line and examine Israel's descendents.

Gen 37:2 introduces us to Joseph who was favored among his brothers in Israel's eyes (Gen 37:3). This created significant tension and strife among the brothers. This was made more significant when Joseph shared with his family how, in a dream, he saw that his family bowing down to him (Gen 37:5-11).

Such hatred and rivalry occured among his brothers...that they conspired to kill Joseph (Gen 37:18). Reuben "counter-plots" to save Joseph's life (Gen 37:21-22). Certainly his plot is the most practical course of action at this point, since a vote would have yielded that his graciousness toward Joseph was a minority opinion.

Over dinner, the brothers come up with an idea to sell Joseph into slavery to the Ishmaelites (Gen 37:25-28). [Note: There is no stronger way to accentuate the slavery than to sell him to the descendents of Ishmael. This was as bad as one could get.] They even justified their change of action by Judah's statement, "let's not kill him...let's sell him into slavery. After all, he is our brother." (Now that is some twisted logic).

In Gen 37:31, we see that they took Joseph's technicolor dreamcoat [No...that was a movie last century]...they took Joseph's multicolor coat/tunic and covered it in goat's blood and carried it to their father. Jacob examined it and discerned that Joseph was killed by a beast and dragged off. Notice...they refer to Joseph at this point as "Joseph's son", not "our brother," (Gen 37:32-33).

Jacob was heartbroken and mourned, while Joseph was carried to Egypt and was sold into slavery at Potiphar's house...the guard of Pharoah (Gen 37:35).

The writer's point is to show how Joseph ended up in Egypt. Remember, the purpose of Genesis is not to give every detail of every human action; rather, it is to show/reveal how God was working through His covenant on behalf of His people. This is a significant point of THEOLOGY.

God exists outside of time. He is the One who created everything and set everything into motion. Some say that He only observes from a distance and does not act in the midst of human history. The story throughout Genesis (and the whole Bible) is that God is above/ outside of time AND active in time. He is not disinterested. He is not a great "watchmaker" who set up a system, wound it up (like a watch) and simply observes its progress. We are people who are in process...but God is both ABOVE that process...and actively guiding us in the process to an end that He already fully knows. So...

Perhaps you are in the midst of a great trial or struggle. You may even question "why God would allow it." Keep in mind...God is in the midst of bringing your circumstance to a glorious conclusion. You will be greatly encouraged to learn to yield to Him in the midst of your journey and observe how and what He is doing as He works all things together according to His will (Rom 8:28-30).

Proverbs 28:17 is the takeaway today. This proverb struck me this morning. The principle is that when a person is in the midst of sin (an unrepentent state...even if not actually sinning at that moment), he is supposed to experience strife, struggle, and suffering. The point of this verse is that we are not to rescue the person from his struggle without seeing his repentence. Why? Simply stated...because the most important thing a person can do is repent and be restored to relationship with God. The consequences of sin are a way that God brings a person to a point to become willing to change.

I think about the moms and dads I have known through the years who like to "bail out" their children without seeing a change first. Their actions...while intended to be compassionate...are actually only delaying the child's repentence, or...making it impossible for the child to repent (due to a hardening of the heart). This is actually a place where we have to care more about doing it God's way...than doing it our way. How we act/respond to people who sin (with love, gentleness, and a firm resolve to see God's righteousness manifested) determines (in small part) how long it takes for a person to repent and give glory to God. {Tough concept...but worthy of thoughtful consideration...at least for me.}

Grace.

Take Two: Genesis 36, Proverbs 27

2009-01-27T06:50:00.003-06:00

Gen 36 contains two toledoths related to Esau and his descendents. The chapter is unique in Genesis in that it gives two of these markes sequentially to the same person (not to mention that he is not in the "line of promise.") One ought to always ask "why" when he comes across such an event.

The first toledoth (Gen 36:1-8) covers Esaus 3 wives and 5 sons...but the focus primarily deals with his land possession. His first two wives were from the Canaanites, whereas the third wife was a cousin from the Ishmaelite line. The "BIG IDEA" in this section is to show that the Edomites (Esau's descendents) VOLUNTARILY left the land of Canaan and took possession of the region of Seir (likely in modern day South Jordan region). Remember, God gave Canaan to Jacob/Israel through Abraham and Isaac. He gave all of Canaan to Israel...and to accentuate the point, this section tells us that Esau/Edom chose to leave the land of Canaan in search of the proverbial "greener pastures" (i.e. more land) in Seir.

It is also important to note that this was an amicable decision and there was a friendly relationship with the Edomites and the Israelites at this time and continuing. NOT SO MUCH today!

The second toledoth focuses on the many descendents and blessing experienced by the Edomites. They became a mighty and powerful people with many tribes, chiefs, and kings. In every way one can measure human blessings, these Edomites were blessed. Esau's descendents (called Edomites) experienced an amicable and peaceful existence and were greatly blessed as a people. The final verse (Gen 36:43) summarizes this concept for us and reminds us of the name change. They are Edomites...a name that served to remind the reader that they descended from Esau who forsook his birthright for a cup of the "red (Edom) stuff" ...a bowl of stew. They lived in the land of their possession, Edom and not Canaan.

Proverbs 27:19 is the takeaway today. Just as water (or a mirror) reflects an accurate image of a person, so the conduct of a man reflects the heart of that man. It is foolish to think that someone who acts in many or most ways as if they could not care about God "truly do" on the inside. I meet moms and dads often who tell me about their children who have not even spoken of God in years. These moms and dads are convinced that "deep down" their son or daughter is "saved." He or she is a Christian...because they were baptized as a child, or recited a prayer one time at a Vacation Bible School.

We would do a greater service to those around us and to the name of Christ to remember that as a person is on the outside, he or she is on the inside. Does this mean that every rebellious act is an indication that a person is separated from God? Certainly not! However...if a person lives a life of continuous rebellion without remorse or repentance, there is no reason to assert that "deep down" the Spirit of God resides within them and they are a child of God. The "man" (in his actions and presentation) reflects the "heart of man" (his condition on the inside.)

Grace,

Take Two: Genesis 35, Proverbs 26

2009-01-26T05:56:00.003-06:00

In Genesis 35, we see the chapter open with God telling Jacob/Israel to move from Shechem (where they were) to Bethel. Jacob instructed those in his household (family, children, grandchildren, servants) to put away their foreign gods and put on fresh clothes (Gen 35:2). This is a picture of sanctifying oneself or making oneself holy. The household did all that he instructed (Gen 35:3-4).

God's hand of protection was upon them as they traveled (Gen 35:5) all the way to Bethel (Gen 35:6-8). God announces the covenant again with Jacob showing that the covenant with Abraham and Isaac was definitely intended to be passed through Jacob (Gen 35:9-12). After this, Jacob/Israel built an altar to God and worshipped Him there (Gen 35:13).

Gen 35:16-21 gives the account of the death of Rebekah. She died while giving birth to Jacob's 12th son (Benjamin). She called him Ben-Oni (son of my sorrow), but Jacob named him Benjamin (son of my right hand). The names of the twelve (which consequently are the heads of the 12 tribes of Israel...in case you had not picked up on that) are listed in Gen 35:23-26.

Gen 35:28-29 records the death of Isaac who had lived to be an "old man" of "ripe age." He was buried by his sons Esau/Edom and Jacob/Israel). These final verses are structured in the same way as Abraham's death is recorded (Gen 25:8), thus indicating the end of another toledoth section.

The point of this chapter was to remind the reader of the fact that God was purposeful in all that He did. The twelve tribes came to be through the promised line of blessing. The blessing was given by grace (since certainly Jacob could do nothing to merit what was promised to his grandfather (Abraham) and father (Isaac) before him. Jacob retraced his steps in his last days to the place where God had spoken to him and there he worshipped. Returning to the place where God spoke to you....is a recurring theme in this book AND in the Christian life. Many years and many miles had occurred in Jacob's Journey since that first visitation in Bethel (Gen 28:10-22). He had lived a good life...that contained both blessing...and consequences of sin. In the end...he, like all of us, dies; but, he leaves 12 sons who comprise the great and blessed nation that are known as the chosen/elect people of God.

I am reminded that I experience the "journey" in my own life. I have gained a few "limps" along the way... God has always been faithful and true to His promise and is worthy of worship at the beginning, in the midst of, and at the end of the Journey.

Proverbs 26:17 is the takeaway today. We are wise to not get involved in the busines of others that does not concern us. To "insert" ourselves in other people's business leaves us vulnerable to consequences we may not expect or desire. Getting involved with that which does not concern us...is like grabbing a dog by the ear. He may just turn and bite.

Grace,

Take Two: Genesis 34, Proverbs 25

2009-01-25T06:25:00.003-06:00

Gen 34 is a "crazy" chapter. In it, we find the recording of the rape of Dinah, Jacob/Israel's daughter by Leah. We also find the "murderous acts" of Simeon and Levi against the Hivites in Shechem.

Gen 34:1-4 seems to indicate that Dinah "visiting" with the daughters of the land is more than a housecall. Dinah was becoming engaged in the Hivite culture which was the antithesis of a separated (holy) life. The intermingling of God's people with the influences of culture often creates an environment when bad things happen. In the midst of her "visiting" with the other women, she encounters Shechem who ultimately rapes her. The details of how the incident came to be are non-existent, but regardless of the details, she is violated.

When Jacob's sons learned of this, they were angered, grieved...and indignant (Gen 34:7). Something had to be done. Hamor, Shechem's father approached Jacob and his sons to negotiate a settlement (Gen 34:8-12). Never does Shechem or Hamor admit to the wrongdoing or show remorse for it; rather, Shechem's actions are justified because he "longed" for Dinah (Gen 34:8). Hamor's solution was to simply intermarry between the tribes and form a greater clan of people united.

Jacob's sons agreed to intermarriage if the men of the land would be circumcised. It is important to note that there was never an intent to allow intermarriage. The sons of Jacob simply wanted to incapacitate the natives so that they would be easier to kill (Gen 34:13-17).

Hamor and Shechem carry the proposal to the city gates and convince the men there this it is a good offer...and that it would be financially lucrative (Gen 34:18-24). I am not sure...but it must have sounded pretty good if all of the men were willing to be circumcised.

On the third day, when the men were most vulnerable from their "procedure," Simeon and Levi (sons of Leah and Jacob) sneaked into the city and killed all of the men including Hamor and Shechem (Gen 34:25). The took Dinah from Shechem's house (Gen 34:26) and then looted the city, taking herds, money, and women and children (Gen 34:27-29). Their intent was to inflict pain and take vengence for the rape of Dinah, their sister.

Why were Simeon and Levi the ones to act? It is important to remember that they were full brothers with Dinah since they too were sons of Leah. It also seems, from the reaction of Jacob and the presentation by the writer, that they acted rashly and impetuously...thus committing the sin of murder.

Jacob chides them for their actions in Gen 34:30. He tells them that their actions will have long-term consequences. This is a major difference from the impetuous man in his youth...before he gained a limp. Simeon and Levi try to justify their actions by pointing to the travesty committed against Dinah (Gen 34:31). The lack of acknowledgement and acceptance by Jacob (or the biblical writer) shows that their justification was lacking...and speaks to the saying of our parents, "two wrongs don't make a right."

The text does not diminish the violence shown toward Dinah or reduce the significance of the crime against her. That is not the point. The law in Israel was that "to lay with" a betrothed virgin warranted a death sentence, but "to lay with" an unbetrothed virgin warranted that the attacker marry her (support her for life) and pay a large penalty to her father. (Notably, there was no consideration for the rape of a woman by a non-Israelite).

It is easy enough to read this passage and respond with sympathy toward Simeon and Levi. However, the Bible does not justify their actions any more than it justifies the actions of Shechem (the rape) or Hamor (trying to negotiate a deal to make it go away). Vengeance belongs to the Lord...who may use civil authorities to carry it out, but there is no allowance for vigilante justice.

Proverbs 25:21-22 is the takeaway today. God's ways are so counter-cultural and counter-intuitive. No one desires to bless his enemy. Here, God's Word points out to us that when our enemy has needs, it is an open door for us to demonstrate God's goodness. It is one thing to show kindness to those who can benefit us. It is quite another to show kindness to him who has been against us in the past. By meeting our enemy's need, we give God "maximum room" to bring conviction. We also demonstrate our trust of God alone as our source, our strength, our Lord, and our Reward.

Take Two: Genesis 33, Proverbs 24

2009-01-24T07:47:00.003-06:00

Genesis 33 picks up the narrative of Israel meeting Esau. Israel assembled his family (maids and children first, then Leah and children, then Rachel and children (Gen 33:1-2). This seems to be in order of value/ affection he had for the women from least to greatest. (I wouldn't make too much of it...since they had to be in some order...why not this one?)

Israel led the way and stopped to bow 7 times when approaching his brother Esau. This is a picture of great humility and respect (Gen 33:3). Esau responded in the same manner as the father responded to the prodigal son (Luke 15:20-24)...by running to him to embrace and kiss him (Gen 33:4). After making some introductions, Esau and Israel began the "Near East negotiation dance" where they go back and forth over the presents (Gen 33:8-11).

Esau offers to lead Israel's party back to Seir but Israel prevails and agrees to come at the pace with is best for children and livestock (and a man with a limp...but who would admit that) (Gen 33:12-17).

The section ends with Israel purchasing a piece of land in Shechem where he erected an altar and called it "God, the God of Israel" (Gen 33:18-20). It is a fitting way to end this section of the narrative because it is Israel's resolution to the tension. Remember, God spoke to him and told him to return to Canaan with his family. To do so meant uprooting from all that his wives and children knew...and all that he had acquired. Perhaps more significant...going back meant facing old "skeletons" like Esau. It would have been easy enough to justify staying, yet he went in faith and prepared for the worst. In the midst of the journey, he wrestles with God, has a character transformation, and gains a reminder (a limp) that is ever-present. Of course he would buy a piece of land (it is not worship unless it costs you something), and calls God (the God of Abraham and Isaac) the God of Israel.

Proverbs 24:7 is the takeaway today. It struck me this morning that those who speak foolishness (things that are not of God) recognize that foolishness is lacking. When they are in the presence of wisdom at the gates, they don't even open their mouths. I have found this to be true. On more than one occasion I have seen the "meeting after the meeting." It is the time when a person hears a direction that the "assembly" is going and they separate themselves to one or two which they have influence over and speak to them. Their ideas "make sense" in the small numbers...but do not stand up to the scrutiny of "the gates." Often times, these who call the meeting after the meeting are seen as the experts in their subject. They are respected in their circle. They know that sharing their "wisdom" in the crowd will not "fly," so they wait and try to influence the circle that tells them how smart they are. It usually ends with them telling the circle that "they all" are far more spiritual than the masses and the masses just won't understand. A principle to consider is this...If it is wisdom, true wisdom...it will always triumph in the "city gates." If it won't stand up to this scrutiny...it may in fact be foolishness.

Grace,

Take Two: Genesis 32, Proverbs 23

2009-01-23T06:26:00.003-06:00

Genesis 32 has two major "movements" in it. The first relates to Jacob's encounter with Esau. (He is returning home 20 years after the "stolen blessing"). The second relates the story of Jacob "wrestling with God." This story is both "etiological," in that it explains the "why" of a Jewish cultural phenomenon; and, it is intended to draw the reader's attention back to the life of Abram/Abraham.

Gen 32:1 is very strange. Jacob is cruising back into his family's land and comes upon a camp of angels. The word for these angels is in fact refering to heavenly beings. Angels play a significant role in Genesis. Remember that two angels accompanied the Lord to meet Abram outside his tent and then proceeded to Sodom to usher out Lot (and family) before destroying the city (Gen 18-19). Many have speculated as to why there is a camp of angels. No one knows. Likely, it was a reminder for Jacob that God's protective presence was with him. Based on his actions immediately following the encounter, it may also be that the angels gave him instructions concerning Esau (but this is speculative).

Gen 32:3-8 details the sending of envoys to Esau. When the messengers returned, they notified Jacob that Esau was coming with 400 men. Jacob seems to have "grown up a bit." He does not react emotionally, but responds by dividing his company into two companies (Gen 32:7-8) in case things go wrong.

Gen 32:9-12 details Jacob's calling on God. He cries out in his prayer the promise made by God to his father (and grandfather) and yields himself under God (calling him Lord). He expresses that this circumstance is overwhelming to him, but that he was simply following the instructions that God had given him (Gen 32:9). He declares that God's grace has been upon him (Gen 32:10) and asks for God's help in delivering him (Gen 32:11). His prayer closes with claiming the promise of the covenant (Gen 32:12).

After spending the night, Jacob assembles a large peace offering for his brother and commands his servants to go before him to deliver the gifts (Gen 32:14-20).

In Gen 32:22-23, we see that during the night, Jacob sent his wives and children across the ford along with every other possession he had. He was left alone there in preparation for the meeting with Esau. There, while alone, he is met by "a man" whom he wrestles with until daylight (Gen 32:24-26.

The result of the "wrestling" encounter with "the man" who is revealed to us to be God (Gen 32:28-30) was a changing of the name from Jacob (supplanter/deceiver) to Israel (God strives/ or, one who strives with God). Remember that names reflect character, so name changes reflect a change in character. The Israel who emerges from this struggle is different than the Jacob who entered into the contest. Yes, Jacob won the struggle...but did he?

With a touch from "the man" he gained a dislocated hip and a lifelong limp...to serve as a constant reminder of that day. "The man" asked him his name (Gen 32:27-28) and renamed him, indicating his (the man's) superiority. When Jacob asked "the man's" name, it was not given...only revealed to us by implication. Yes, Jacob won the match, but not because he asserted his will over God and overcame him. He was victorious in the match because at the end of the striving and struggle, God blessed him.

I love when people "wrestle" with God. There are far too many weak "professors" of Christ who have never worked to understand the depth and breadth of who God is. They affirm soundbite theology and are fearful at the first sign of resistance. I love when young people and young-at-heart people ask the tough questions. I love when they refuse to simply affirm a hand-me-down theology, choosing rather to gain their own deep understanding. The quality of "faith" coming out of the struggle is far superior to that obtained without a struggle. When crisis and challenge comes upon us, we are pushed to the ends of ourselves and left to rely only on the One who alone can provide. Praise God for the struggles and for the blessings that are available for the "asking" at the end of the contest.

The man (Israel) who limped away from this fight possessed more confidence, character, and humility before God than ever before. He was, in fact, ready now to face his brother and to take his place in the annals of history as the great Patriarch of the faith.

Proverbs 23:13-14 is the takeaway today. One of the most difficult struggles that parents encounter is the struggle to discipline our children. To discipline (as we ought) takes time, patience, wisdom, self-control, and a steadfast resolve. Discipline forsaken CONDEMNS our children to hell. They never learn about authority, holiness, or expectations. They begin in life without the basic tools to thrive in life. Discipline applied, even when it is hard, will not destroy our children, but will enable them. Culture offers a variant opinion, but who do we trust? The principles of this world...or the power of the Word and the One who gave it for our good?

Grace,

Take Two: Genesis 31, Proverbs 22

2009-01-22T06:16:00.003-06:00

As I read on about the tales of Jacob, it reminds me of a "sit com" of sorts. Certainly, Jacob is living up to his name (which means deceiver/supplanter).

Jacob, after hearing that the sons of Laban are murmuring against him for taking Laban's flocks, has a dream where God instructs him to go to the land of his "fathers" (Gen 31:1-3). Jacob needed to "slip out" in order to leave with the flocks he had acquired. To go to Laban would surely have led to an encounter and to Jacob being mistreated (as with the marriage covenant to Rachel and with his wages, etc). Jacob enlisted the help of his wives (Leah and Rachel) and told them of the dream (Gen 31:11-13).

Rachel and Leah accept Jacob's vision and also note their own misgivings with their father. He had sold them to Jacob (for 7 years of service each) and had squandered their dowry. They willingly conspire with Jacob to leave in a culturally inappropriate way (Gen 31:14-16).

It is interesting to me that his daughters accepted "the deceiver's" dream story as true, and it becomes the reason that they agree to leave.

In Gen 31:17-21, Jacob sets out with his family to leave. They get a 3 day head start before Laban learns of their actions and sets out after them. Rachel, before leaving, stole all of Laban's household idols. This becomes a point of contention and will surface again.

Laban is "fit to be tied." As he is setting out after Jacob, God speaks to him in a dream and warns him to not "overstep his authority" (This is the meaning of the figure of speech "good or bad" according to Ken Matthews in the NAC Commentary, 523).

When Laban overtakes Jacob he asserts the charge that Jacob had stolen his daughters by the sword (Gen 31:26). Laban asserted that he would have thrown a going away party had Jacob come to him (Gen 31:27-28). Laban goes on in his charge to assert that he could harm Jacob if he wished but God had intervened on his (Jacob's) behalf. The final point of dispute is the stealing of the gods from Laban's home...something that Jacob has no knowledge of (Gen 31:30-32).

Laban searched the tents for his gods but did not find them, because Rachel had placed them in her saddle and then told her father (as she sat on the saddle) that she could not get up since "the manner of women is upon her." Certainly now...her father would not search the saddle. (Perhaps Rachel has become adept at deception herself.)

When the search yielded no results, Jacob lodges his complaint (Gen 31:36-42).

Laban proposed the peace covenant. Laban swears that God will witness if Jacob mistreats his daughters...and Jacob draws a line of boundary between the two men and swears that neither will cross it for harm (Gen 31:43-55). The covenant was sealed, and the next day, Laban left.

When you spend a few years in church, you start thinking that all of the stories of the Bible character are pretty "sanitized." One of the things I like about the OT is the people are presented to us "warts and all" (as my old professor would say). Jacob had issues. Rachel had issues. Laban had issues. Leah...her too. Yet, God showed grace and mercy toward them all. These characters encourage me, since I too have issues...and God's mercies are new every morning (Lam 3:22-23).

Proverbs 22:28 is the takeaway today. In this verse we see a couple of implications for us. First, we need to know that boundaries are set for reasons. In times past, certain limits, doctrines, beliefs, and practices were put in place for a reason. We should not tear them down without fully understanding why...and then only if they are placed there in error. Second, we are not to move the boundaries. We are to live within the boundaries that are set by our fathers. They serve to protect and guide us. Third, since the boundaries are set by our fathers, and it is mentioned here, then abiding within the boundaries yields blessing (this is the theme of Proverbs).

In the midst of our journey (personally and corporately) we all have a context of reference. It is natural to speak out against those boundaries we inherited from our fathers (often times because we don't fully grasp why they are there). It is spiritual to recognize the wisdom of the boundaries and to live within them. I am not speaking of the cultural boundaries (music, dress, "don't go into the water within 30 minutes of eating"), but of the doctrinal boundaries (the nature and will of God, the nature of discipleship, the nature of the church, the responsibility of parents, etc). I KNOW this may seem a bit random but God is working in me on a few things and I just needed to write them out. Grace,

Take Two: Genesis 30, Proverbs 21

2009-01-21T06:30:00.003-06:00

The strain on the two sisters becomes obvious in this chapter. Rachel was unable to bear a son for Jacob as her sister did. This was a great distress on her. So, she gave Jacob her maid and bore a son (Dan) for Jacon through her (Gen 30:1-5). Rachel claimed that this was proof that God had heard her pleas and her maid bore a second son (Naphtali) for Jacob (Gen 30:6-8). Gen 30:8 tells us how significant it was to Rachel to bear sons because of the strife she was having with her sister (Jacob's other wife).

Leah was not far behind in the action. She gave her maid to Jacob and bore two sons (Gad and Asher) (Gen 30:9-13). The battle intensified when Reuben (Leah's oldest son) brought mandrakes in from the field. Mandrakes were known for their power as an aphrodisiac and for increasing fertility. Rachel asked for some of the mandrakes and Leah resisted because Rachel had stolen Jacob from her (Gen 30:14-15). Rachel "barters" the evening with Jacob away to Leah in exchange for the fruit. I know it was a barter because Leah met Jacob coming in from the field and told him she had hired him for the night (Gen 30:16).

Some think that "sex" and "close relationships" in an "open" setting are just part of life. In fact, I have had people tell me that they want to have several close relationships (dating) and sexual experiences before mariage so they can "know for certain" that they are going to be happy when they finally marry. God always intended for mariage to be between one man and one woman for life. The struggles between these two sisters is but one example of why. It is not that God desires to withhold and restrict...but that He desires to bless and protect from pain. These two sisters lived daily in conflict and competition with one another. Their own "self-worth" was established in large part based on how Jacob chose between them and whether they could produce children to gain his affection.

In Gen 30:25-41, we see that Jacob asks Laban for permission to leave and take his wives. Laban resists because Jacob has brought Laban great wealth and God has blessed Laban through the blessing of Jacob (Gen 30:27-30). DON'T MISS THAT. As God was blessing Jacob, those around Jacob experienced the blessings of God. (This is a fulfillment of promise and is a theological underpinning that guides the policy toward Israel, even today, for many people.)

Jacob negotiates with Laban to give him all of the "defects" of the flock. (A black sheep was bad and a spotted or speckled goat was bad.) Once Laban agreed, Jacob began intentionally breeding the strong ones of the flock so that they would produce offspring that appeared defective. He did this in retaliation for Laban's treatment of him. The end result was Laban's agreement with Jacob would yield for him only the weakest of the flock and Jacob would gain the greatest share. (Tomorrow's chapter explains more of Jacob's motivation for his actions.)

Proverbs 21:1 is the takeaway today. Yesterday was the inauguration of the 44th President of the United States. He is African-American (which was made much of). Symbolically, it is significant...but practically, it is a disservice to treat him differently because of his race- either for good or bad. I am happy for him and for the evidence of how far a country has come when we demonstrate equality in such a significant way. Scripture commands us as Christ-followers to pray for our leaders...knowing that every leader is established by God for His purpose. This verse in Proverbs is a key motivation as to why we should pray for our leaders. The heart of a man/king is moved by the Spirit of God to seek righteousness. We owe it to the leader to intercede for him as he makes difficult decisions. We owe it to God to follow the leaders he has established. I met some "sad" Christians yesterday whose "man" didn't make it. They were downcast because a Democrat was elected. Friends...God is not a Democrat or a Republican...or even an American. He is Sovereign over all and we rest in His Sovereignty...knowing that He can turn the heart of a king toward Himself.

Take Two: Genesis 29, Proverbs 20

2009-01-20T06:53:00.003-06:00

Genesis 29 gives the details of how Jacob met his wife (Rachel) and her sister Leah...also his wife. Jacob worked for seven years for Laban and his income was to be the younger daughter of Laban, Rachel (Gen 29:20). Laban switched daughters on him at the last minute (Gen 29:25-26).

Jacob agreed to work another 7 years...this time for Rachel (Gen 29:27). It seems from the flow of events that immediately following the 7 day wedding party for Leah, that Laban threw another party for Rachel. I am not sure how that went at the family gatherings because it was obvious that Jacob's affections for Rachel were strong and that he only accepted Leah. In fact, God...seeing that Leah was not loved...closed the womb of Rachel and gave Jacob four sons by Leah (Gen 29:31-35).

Proverbs 20:6 is the takeaway today. It is easier to declare something than to live it. The test of a man's loyalty is seen in his actions and not his confession only.

Grace,

Take Two: Genesis 28, Proverbs 19

2009-01-19T06:30:00.003-06:00

As we dig into Gen 28, we see that Isaac sent Jacob to Haran, to the people of Laban (Jacob's uncle on his mother's side) to find a wife (Gen 28:1-2). {And some people joke about folks from Alabama going to family reunions to pick up dates.} Gen 28:3-5 details the blessing of Isaac toward Jacob and reminds the reader of the blessing given to Abraham by God. (This is intentional). It is clear that the covenant blessing of Abraham is to be continued through Jacob and not Esau.

Gen 28:6-9 gives a response by Esau. He now is clear on his mistake in taking wives from among the Canaanites. He sets out to and finds a wife from his father's lineage, through Ishmael. While the attempt on Esau's part is to do that which pleases his father (as he has deduced from the instruction and blessing of Isaac toward Jacob), he further solidifies in the reader's mind that he is not the line of covenant promise. He weaves his life back into the line of Ishmael. Now the descendents {of Esau and the grand-daughter of Ishmael} will continually prove to be in direct opposition to the people of Israel.

Gen 28:10-17 details the dream of Jacob's ladder (or stairway). It has been interpreted in many ways through the years, but the point of it is to affirm through a "theophany" (a manifestation of or appearance of God) the covenant of God with Jacob's descendents. You see the promise of the land (Gen 28:13), the promise of many descendents (Gen 28:14), and the promise of blessing for Jacob and through Jacob (and his descendents) (Gen 28:14). (See also Gen 12:1-3, Gen 17:6-8, Gen 22:15-18).

Gen 28:18-22 demonstrates the setting aside (declaring holy) and naming of the place of this revelation. It is called Bethel (i.e. Beth (house) - El (God)) which is house of God. Jacob makes a vow to God at this place that if God will do as he has already committed, Jacob will be a faithful follower of God.

Bear in mind that the purpose and focus of the book of Genesis is not to teach us "necessarily" how we are to act toward God; rather it is to reveal to us how God has acted toward His people. Jacob's negotiation/vow is not to be understood as "prescriptive" (something we are told to do); rather, it is descriptive of what Jacob did and how God dealt graciously with him.

God' grace is evident throughout this chapter. His hand and fingerprints are clearly seen. God is good and gracious toward Jacob...because God is good and gracious, not because He is obligated to act in response to Jacob's vow.

Proverbs 19:19 is the takeaway today. There is a principle involved here of letting a person bear the consequences of his own sin. Our tendency, when we see people we love make poor choices, is to bail them out. Often times this is done in such a way that they never learn the lesson of the experience. When we eliminate consequences, we may in fact doom a person to repeat the sin. Every moment, I have found, is a teachable moment: whether with my children or with people I help along the way in the Christian journey. Rather than "bailouts" or "rescues," it is very appropriate to walk with a person and "bear their burdens" with them, pointing always to the lesson to be gained.

Take Two: Genesis 27, Proverbs 18

2009-01-18T06:25:00.003-06:00

Gen 27 gives the story of Jacob's blessing. Isaac commissioned Esau to go and hunt and kill to prepare a meal for him. After which Isaac was to bless Esau. Rebekah, who we already know favored Jacob, called Jacob in to instruct him on how to deceive his father and receive the blessing intended for Esau (Gen 27:1-13).

Rebekah prepared the meal for Isaac and dressed Jacob in Esau's clothes. She used the goat skin to make covering for Jacobs hands and neck, so that he would feel hairy when Isaac touched him (Gen 27:14-17).

Jacob began to carry forward with the deception and convinced his father that he was Esau. Isaac was suspicious, but his lack of vision and age prevented him from being able to certain that it was Jacob before him (Gen 27:18-27).

Gen 27:28-29 contains the blessing. Jacob would live in the fertile region and would be a wealthy man, blessed with flocks and produce. He would be blessed by the nations who he would rule over (a prophesy of things to come) and his own brothers would be servants to him. The blessing is reminiscent of Gen 12:3, when God first blessed Abraham.

The deception comes to light when Esau returns and prepares his meal. He learns of Jacob's deception and begs Esau to bless him in some way. Gen 27:39-40 contains that blessing. Esau would be a "desert" man and would live by his physical strength and courage (the sword). He would ultimately rebel against his brother's (Israel's) authority and would break the yoke from his neck (meaning he would defy them).

Esau is angry and vengeful. He decided that when Isaac died, he would kill Jacob. Rebekah heard of the plot and intends to send Jacob away to her brother Laban in Haran. Rebekah even sets it up so that Isaac is the one who will send Jacob away...to find a wife (Gen 27:46).

As you read this, it is easy enought to start sympathizing with Esau. (I love the underdog of the story in just about anything). One may even start to favor Esau and question, "why would God bless Jacob after he has lied?" Not to try to defend God...but let me offer two other possible perspectives and see if they might shed light on any of this.
First, God has a plan to bring about. While it may seem that Esau got "shafted" in this, is it not possible that Isaac was going to get it wrong...miss what God wanted to come to pass, and through the deception of Rebekah/Jacob, God's plan came to pass? God does not need a reason to choose one brother over another. He is God and will not stand judgment for His motives or His actions by any of us.
Second, I am (as one person) glad that God blesses people who do it wrong now and again. I am always messing up and missing God on things. I sin far more often than I want. I think of my own interests way more than I should. I worry about me and mine in far greater ways than any person ought ever to worry or be concerned. Yet, God blesses me. The standard for God's blessing is grace, not justice. If God only blessed those who were deserving...you would miss out too. (You are not perfect either). This story is a story of how things came to be in the lives of the Patriarchs. It is not an instruction manual on how to live ones life. We can learn from it...without concluding that we must all become active in deceiving those around us.

Proverbs 18:9 is the takeaway today. Laziness and complacency are closely related to destruction. You and I are called to be advocates, not bystanders or detractors. As it relates to our witness, it is not enough to not be against the gospel...we must be for it. As for truth and righteousness, it is not enough to not be against it...we must advocate it. In everything that is of God, we are called to be passionately in pursuit of it. To simply sit by is only one step away from being destructive. Our actions often yield the same produce.

Take Two: Genesis 26, Proverbs 17

2009-01-17T06:49:00.003-06:00

Genesis 26 contains a couple of key elements about Isaac's life. Gen 26:1 describes a famine that was oppressive inthe land. God appeared to Isaac and told him not to go to Egypt, but to dwell where God had placed him (Gen 26:2). Gen 26:3-6, is an affirmation of the covenant promise God had made to Abraham.

Isaac learned a lot from his father...even how best to introduce his wife (Gen 26:7-11). It is interesting to see just how much a child learns from example.

God blessed Isaac with great wealth and prosperity. So much so, that Abimelech, king of the Philistines asked Isaac to "move on", since his size and wealth had made him a threat (Gen 26:12-17). In Gen 26:23-25 we see another affirmation of the covenant. Some time had passed (Gen 26:8), so it seems reasonable that God reaffirm for Isaac what was in store.

To all who knew him, it was obvious that God's blessings were on Isaac. Abimelech even came to him to form a covenant of peace (Gen 26:28-31). All seems to be going well, except Esau decides to marry two wives from the Hittites and it caused Isaac and Rebekah great trouble (Gen 26:34-35).

In God's first affirmation of covenant with Isaac, He noted that the reason He would bring the covenant about was because of Abraham's faithfulness to Him (Gen 26:5). All of the promises of God are available to us, but God expects us to choose to be faithful to Him and His calling for our lives.

Proverbs 17:24 is the takeaway. A man of understanding can see the solutions that are right before him, but a fool looks into the distance. Sometimes it amazes me that people have such deep questions about things like relationships, finances, parenting, and the will of God. They seem to be searching for a new revelation and cast their eyes to the "ends of the earth." I usually just point them back to the Bible since Wisdom is in their midst. God is not far off. He is not laying out new and improved approaches. His instruction is just as relevant today as it was when given, because God is just as relevant as He was long ago.

Take Two: Genesis 25, Proverbs 16

2009-01-16T06:29:00.002-06:00

Genesis 25 tells us briefly of Abraham's days following Sarah's death. Abraham married again and fathered six more sons by this wife (Gen 25:1-2). Abraham gave his possessions to Isaac and blessed all of his other children with gifts (Gen 25:1-6). At the age of 175, Abraham died...and the Scripture testifies that he had lived "satisfied with life." What a great and telling testimony (Gen 25:7-8).

Abraham was buried with Sarah by his sons, Isaac and Ishmael (Gen 25:9-10). The next toledoth begins in Gen 25:12 with the generations of Ishmael. We have a record of Ishmael's descendents in Gen 25:12-18.

Gen 25:19 begins the toledoth of Isaac. His account is more lengthy that Ishmael's. Remember that the writer is not giving a historical record of all that occurred, but a selective record of the history that God wanted preserved. Isaac is not more special that Ishmael in the sight of God; however, he is the line through whom the promise will come...because God deemed it to be so.

Isaac was 40 at marriage and Rebekah was unable to conceive (Gen 25:21), so Isaac prayed and God gave her twins. (Be careful what you pray for). From the beginning, Esau and Jacob wrestled and competed (Gen 25:22-23). Esau was born first, and as such, was entitled to the birthright. All that Isaac had would be divided at his death and a double portion would go to him by birthright. He was even favored by his father because he was a hunter (Gen 25:28); however, Rebekah favored Jacob (a fact that will show its significance in a few verses).

One day, Jacob had prepared a lentil stew and Esau wanted it. Jacob agreed to give him some stew in exchange for his birthright. As crazy as it sounds, Esau sold his birthright for some lentil stew (Gen 25:30-34). Some may say that Jacob manipulated his brother and tricked him into selling his birthright. However, Esau valued so little his birthright (his ultimate blessing), that he sacrificed it for immediate gratification (a single meal).

Proverbs 16:32 is the takeaway. It is easier to win a military victory than to control oneself. The greatest battle we will every face is to discipline ourselves to be followers of God. May we seek to accomplish the greatest task daily.

Take Two: Genesis 24, Proverbs 15

2009-01-15T06:25:00.003-06:00

Gen 24 gives the explanation of the taking of a wife for Isaac. Abraham was 137 years old when Sarah died. Sometime following her death, Abraham decided that it was time for Isaac to have a wife, so he commanded his servant to find one. His instructions were clear: The wife for Isaac must come from Abraham's relatives (his people) and not from the Canaanites (Gen 24:3).

The servant took an oath to accomplish the task and set out for the land of Abraham's relatives. Abraham was confident that this was the will of God and that God would bring the identity of the chosen wife to light (Gen 24:7).

Abraham's servant prayed and asked God to identify the prospective wife by having her demonstrate hospitality to him, a stranger in the land (Gen 24:10-14). Immediately, as the prayer was voiced, Rebekah came on scene and fulfilled the criteria that the servant had asked (Gen 24:17-21). The servant asked to accompany her home so he and his party could lodge there that night. (Yes, he and his friends invited themselves to dinner at her parent's home. Culturally, this still occurs today in many ways in this region).

The servant shared all that had occurred with Laban (Rebekah's brother) and Bethuel (her father) (Gen 24:50-51). {I suppose mother was not far away}. Their reply was pretty intriguing to me: "we are not able to judge whether this is good or bad, it is the Lord. Let it come to pass." WHAT AN INCREDIBLE display of unquestioning obedience.

The next morning, as Abraham's servant was preparing to depart, Rebekah's mother and brother stated that they would give Rebekah a few days to consider the marriage. This was not completely unheard of, but was not required. Rebekah, when asked, agreed to go immediately (Gen 24:55-60). It seems to me that she too recognized this as an act of God and wanted to comply...even if she had never seen the man she would soon marry.

Gen 24:67 is a polite Jewish way of telling us that they were married and that the marriage was consumated.

I know that "obedience" is the life we are called to live. If there is any part of our lives that we think is completely personal (in our cultural today) it is the area of choosing a spouse. What is pictured here is that God had purposed for this couple to be married. He made his will evident and guided the process (as the people were yielded to hear from Him). As such, the marriage was as much about worshipping God through obedient submission as any other part of life. I wonder if there are parts of life we consider to be too personal to consult God on? Is it true that God has a perfect will for all of us in every area of our lives? The answer is an emphatic YES. This is why it is so important for us to KNOW and DO the will of God.

Proverbs 15:14 is the takeaway today. There is a parallel between the "mind" and the "mouth." Those who are intelligent/discerning/mature seek wisdom. They want to know the will of God ("the fear of God is the beginning of knowledge" Prov 1:7). The foolish ones seek to know every nugget of information without any thought as to its source or value. They relish in the "juicy" nuggets of folly. How do you know who is who? Out of the mouth comes the meditations of the heart. Or as one computer programmer once said, "Garbage in, garbage out." Seek after and fill your mind with that which is from God. Reject that which fools feast on (gossip, suspicion, and black helicopter theories).

Grace,

Take Two: Genesis 23, Proverbs 14

2009-01-14T06:15:00.004-06:00

Gen 23 details the death of Sarah, Abraham's wife. Sarah was 127 at her death. Abraham went to the people of the land in Hebron, the sons of Heth, and asked to purchase a grave for his wife (Gen 23:1-4). The people told him that he was well respected and could have the choicest place. Abraham asked for a specific location which belonged to Ephron, the son of Zohar (Gen 23:9).

Ephron wanted to give the cave and the land near it to Abraham, but Abraham asked to pay full price for it (Gen 23:11-13). After some negotiation, Ephron named the value of the land and Abraham paid it, in full, without negotiation in the presence of all of the people (Gen 23:15-16).

This parcel of land became a possession for Abraham. In fact, it is the only piece/parcel of land that Abraham owned in Canaan, the land which he was promised as an inheritance (Acts 7:5).

Two observations that I saw as significant:

First, the cultural practice of the day would have dictated that a person bury family in their homeland. It would have been natural to return to whatever place Abraham would call home to bury his wife. He chose to bury her in Canaan, the land which God had promised him. This implied that Abraham still believed in the covenant promise of God as if it were already so. (it is closely akin to praying for rain with an umbrella in one's hand.) Canaan was Abraham's land even though he was only a wanderer in it (by every measure of the standard of man.)

Second, while the "back and forth" on the price of the land would have been culturally normal, it is significant to me that Abraham would not accept the land without paying full price. His act of respect and love toward his wife in her burial was not a cheap act. Had he been given the cave or given the land, the value of his act would have been somewhat cheapened. In the same manner, our act of worship to God should be one of value to us. God is not pleased in the value of the gift as much as the value of the gift to the one who gave it. In other words, God is not one who respects one's sacrificed lamb more highly than another's sacrificed lamb because the lamb cost more or had a better pedigree. Jesus affirmed the widow's offering over the plentious offerings of the wealthy because the widow gave from her poverty while the wealthy gave from their overflow (Mark 12:42-43). Our service to God...our worship of God...should demonstrate how we value Him. That demonstration is seen in the price we are willing to pay...the sacrifice we will make...to worship Him. Whether one "tips" God in their giving or their living...demonstrates how much they value Him.

Abraham loved Sarah. This is seen, not only in his devotion to her throughout his life, but also in the honor he showed her in her burial.

Proverbs 14:2 is the takeaway today. You can tell more about a person's heart toward God by his actions than his words. Many can profess to love God. Less people possess a love for God. The way to know is to see how they live their life.

Grace,

Take Two: Genesis 22, Proverbs 13

2009-01-13T06:23:00.004-06:00

Genesis 22 is a difficult chapter to relate to because it involves Abraham's sacrifice of Isaac. In our mindset (at least my own as a father and as someone who has followed God for a number of years now) it is troubling to think that (1) God would ask Abraham to offer his son as an offering, and (2) that Abraham would even consider complying.

Keeping in mind what Abraham was willing to risk to this point is helpful. He has twice lied and asked Sarah to lie about being his wife. This is significant because these were attempts to provide for himself to protect himself and/or his family. The sin with Hagar. Abraham and Sarah agreed to provide in a way they thought was best to give Abraham an heir.

As we can see, the stories in Genesis are selective and communicate a point. Abraham has been in a process, on a journey, to learning what it means to surrender all to God and trust Him in every way.

Now the greatest test I can ever imagine. Will you take your son Isaac and sacrifice him at the Lord's request (Gen 22:2)? God doesn't ask questions...He provides tests. Many people "say" they are something or believe something...but God says "show me something."

Abraham, Isaac and two servants begin walking toward the mountain. It is a 3 day journey. Lots of time to consider turning back. Gen 22:5 gives a glimpse of Abraham's belief about the event. He stated that he and the boy would go worship and return. Gen 22:7 reveals the question from Isaac, "where is the sacrifice?" Abraham responded that God would provide his own lamb for the sacrifice (Gen 22:8).

PAUSE: Not only is this a great time of commitment for Abraham, but it is a great time of teaching for Isaac. He is learning, by example, what it is to live surrendered to the Will of God.

The test continued through the construction of the altar, and even the binding of Isaac. It was not until Abraham raised the knife that God intervened and provided a ram for the altar (Gen 22:9-13). Abraham had learned "dependence" and "trust" well. He demonstrated his Faith...not in word alone, but also in deed. That place of worship became known as "Jehoveh Jireh" (the Lord will Provide). {Remember...names mean something.}

In Gen 22:15-19, God reaffirms his covenant promise to bless Abraham. God swore by Himself to bring the blessing about. There was nothing/no one higher to swear by.

Gen 22:20-24 give a genealogy of Nahor's descendents...which includes Rebekah.

CONSIDERATION: What is your "Isaac?" What is it that is so precious to you that you might not commit it to God? What or who is off-limits. I meet folks at times who tell me that they will never go to the mission field if it means leaving their parents, children, grandchildren, or other close friends. Their Isaac is a relationship. Others won't pursue a calling becuase it would require training in college or seminary...and that would require sacrificing time or fun activities. Their "Isaac" is these things. Still others don't want to risk failure or loss of security or a career change. Their "Isaac" may be PRIDE. What is yours?

Whatever it is...learn this from Abraham. He provided the "Isaac." He gave you that which is now so precious that you might withhold it from the "Giver" of all that is good. No greater worship exists than to lay it all on the altar and yield it to Jehoveh Jireh...knowing He is the God who provides.

Proverbs 13:13 is the takeaway today. The Word is the Word. God's Word is unchanging. God is unchanging. The one who fights against it (despises it) is indebted to it. In other words, the Word shall be his judge. The one who abides by the Word...he is delivered by it. The Word is not his judge, but his guide. How do you treat the commands of God in your life?

Take Two: Gen 21, Proverbs 12

2009-01-12T06:32:00.003-06:00

Gen 21 reveals the fulfillment of the promise to give Abraham a son by Sarah. In God's timing, He brought about the fulfillment of the promise according to His Word (Gen 21:1-2). Abraham circumcised his son on the 8th day as he was commanded. (Note, this was before the Law was written down. As I noted in a previous discussion on the tithe as an offering being a practice that preceded the Law, so is this act of circumcision.)

As Isaac grew it seems that Ishmael began to "mock" him. I am not sure of the extent or exact nature....but it seems to be more than a sibling rivalry. Sarah wanted Ishmael and Hagar out and Abraham was distressed. Ishmael was his son as well.

God told Abraham to send Ishmael and Hagar away as Sarah had requested and affirmed that his line of descendents would be through Isaac (Gen 21:12). This gives us some insight into the mindset that was guiding Abraham. His son Ishmael was also a descendent (Gen 21:13) of Abraham but God points to the descendents of Isaac as the line of promise. Since God gave both children to Abraham, it would seem reasonable to conclude that part of what troubled Abraham about sending Ishmael away was that Abraham did not want to interfere with God bringing about his covenant promise. In other words, Abraham was really concerned about insuring that he would not miss the will of God.

Gen 21:13 is a promise from God to Abraham regarding Ishmael. We see God's hand of blessing "play out" in the following verses (Gen 21:14-20). God spoke to Hagar in Gen 21:17 and affirmed that He is still a God who sees (Gen 16:13), and is a God who hears (the cries of the lad). God provided a well for water (Gen 21:19) and met their needs in the wilderness.

The remaining verses of Gen 21:22-34 detail the covenant with Abimelech that Abraham made.

Proverbs 12:16 is the takeaway today. Displays of anger (outbursts) are displays of a lack of discipline. We are emotional beings...but not beings that are to be controlled by our emotions. Our emotions (feelings) are to be controlled. We know from the NT, that one of the "fruits of the Spirit" is self-control. As we learn to yield ourselves to God and endeavor to be led by the Spirit in all things, we find that controlling our emotional responses is made possible.

Grace,

Take Two: Genesis 20, Prov 11

2009-01-12T06:04:00.003-06:00

This is posted late. I read it yesterday but was jammed for time during the day...and brain fried at night. Sorry it is late.

Gen 20 details the second incident of Abraham's deception over the identity of his wife. To Abimelech he declared Sarah to be his sister (Gen 20:1-2). The lie did not work out so good last time but it was tried again. Abimelech took Sarah to be his wife but never consumated the marriage (Gen 20:6); rather, God came to him in a dream and told him that she was already married. God brought a plague against the house of Abimelech (Gen 20:18) and told him that he would die because he had taken Sarah to be his wife (Gen 20:3). Abimelech pled his case and stated that his actions were wrong but that he had not purposed to do evil (Gen 20:5).

Abimelech's only hope was to return Sarah, confront Abraham and ask for him (Abraham) to pray for him for God's mercy. Abraham justified his deception in two ways...neither of which mitigate against the deception. These are not excuses for his actions, only explanations. First, Abraham was afraid that Abimelech would kill him and take Sarah as his wife. Thsi same fear is what motivated the previous deception. Second, Abraham rationalized his actions by stating it was only a half-lie...since Sarah was his half-sister (Gen 20:11-12). Abraham had Sarah's agreement to maintain this deception wherever they wandered (Gen 20:13). Abimelech made a payment of restitution to Abraham to "right" the "wrong" which he had unintentionally done (Gen 20:14-16). Abraham then prayed for God to lift the curse on Abimelech's house, which he did (Gen 20:17).

As we read this it is difficult to grasp all of the implications of the text. Why did God bless Abraham even though he was deceptive? Why did God protect Sarah in the harem and appear to Abimelech in the dream? Why did Abraham marry his half-sister to start with?

Some of our reaction is due to the cultural differences between then and now. Not that is was right or wrong...but what was culturally acceptable in Abraham's day is different than we consider acceptable today. Here are two possible motivations for this encounter from my perspective.

First, this was another time when God would strengthen Abraham's faith. Faith is not a light switch which you turn on and off. It is a process and a journey. It is strengthen through opportunities to exercise it.
Second, it was a time for God to show Abimelech how powerful the God of Abraham really is! I guarantee that many heard of this event in the day and the God of Abraham was revered as a powerful god...even if He was not looked to as the God! (Consider Rahab's response to the spies in Joshua 2, for a parallel of this idea).

God acted kindly toward Abraham due to grace and not due to merit. This was the basis of Abraham's initial calling and is the same basis for our standing before God today. So, rather than critique Abraham's lack of faith, I choose to thank God for His continuing mercy toward men like Abraham and me!

Proverbs 11:8 is the takeaway. As I read this I was once again reminded that God is the avenger and protector of the righteous. We may not always see the how or when, but God cares for the righteous and exercises judgment toward the wicked.

Take Two: Genesis 19, Proverbs 10

2009-01-10T07:02:00.004-06:00

Genesis 19 reads like a bad soap opera. The place in view is Sodom, the city which God declared exceedingly wicked in the previous chapter. Abraham had negotiated (he thought) to have the city spared if only 10 righteous people could be found to live within. The destruction of the city in this chapter demonstrates the widespread wickedness. Only Lot demonstrated any sense of righteousness (through the display of hospitality- Gen 19:2-3). Don't get me wrong...Lot was not righteous...but his act of hospitality mirrored that of Abraham's in the previous chapter. The intent of the author here is clearly seen by implication.

In Gen 19:2, the angels attempt to rebuff the invite to stay with Lot. This makes me smile a bit because I learned this cultural nuance by committing a faux pas in Egypt last year. I was with some men visiting with an Egyptian who offered us some tea. We did not want tea...but we wanted to have a conversation with the man, so to be polite...we accepted. The man was surprised but very cordial and hospitable. He directed an employee to find a table, chairs, and make tea to serve us in his store. We thought it was a bit much...but wrote it off to being an "Egyptian" thing. After our tea, we left and on the way home, my friend who lived there told us that he had forgotten that (cuturally speaking) we were supposed to refuse the tea. If the man really wanted us to have tea together, he would have pressed the issue. We looked like goofy Westerners by accepting the invitation for hospitality on the first invite.

Once the angels were in Lot's home, the men of the city (all of them) surrounded the house and demanded the angels (strangers who they thought were men) be delivered over for a homosexual relationship with the group (Gen 19:4-5). Lot tried to refuse and even offered his own two daughters instead (who were virgins but engaged to be married (Gen 19:6,14). The men of the city tried to overtake Lot and his home when the angels struck them with blindness. The men groped around but could not find the door to come in. (A supernatural intervention to say the least).

The angels announced the coming judgment (Gen 19:12-13) and directed Lot to gather his family and leave. His warning of the coming judgment sounded incredulous to his sons-in-law who laughed it off (Gen 19:14). Lot did gather his wife and two daughters (4 people in all) and fled with the urging of the angels (Gen 19:15-17). The angels directed Lot to the mountains to flee. Lot hesitated and asked to be allowed to go to Zoar (a small town to the East) instead and his request was granted. He ended up being so afraid though, that he went to the mountains ultimately and lived in a cave with his two daughters (Gen 19:30).

Was Lot righteous in all of this? No. It is because of Abraham (Gen 19:29) that Lot was spared. Only a glimmer of Lot's heritage remained (as was implied in his hospitality). Lot's wife was destroyed in the escape because she looked back. This is not a "glance over the shoulder" kind of looking back. She had come to long for that which God had judged and was destroying. Even with the incredible circumstances of her escape (Gen 19:16-17), she was enamored with the life in Sodom.

This section of Genesis is one of the scariest and most sobering of all to me. I look at the anti-God nature of Sodom and I see many aspects of our culture today. The rampant infatuation with self-pleasure and the lack of regard for God. The lack of awareness and acceptance of the warnings of God. I am greatly aware that the people of Sodom were culturally acclimated to this rampant unrighteousness over a period of time. The culture had even come to affect Lot and his family after prolonged contact with it.

Without OUR redemptive voice pointing people to God, all culture will slip further down the slippery slope of Sodom. We will begin to explain everything without a reference point of God. We will marginalize godly righteousness and define pleasure and success by our standards and not his. This is why it is so important to be the voice of righteousness in our homes, workplaces, and our culture. To simply acquiesce to a cultural view that righteousness is self-defined and open to personal interpretation, is to doom the generation to judgment in mammoth proportions.

The final section (Gen 19:30-38) is disgusting and etiological (explains how something came to be). Lot's daughters, afraid that they will have no descendents of their own, get their father drunk and have sex with him, hoping to become pregnant with a descendent themselves. Abraham and Sarai had no physical descendents and trusted God. Lot would have no physical descendents...but his daughters chose to take care of this problem without God. The results were two son (one born to each daughter) who were the fathers to the Moabites and the Ammonites...two notorious enemies of God's people (Gen 19:36-38).

Proverbs 10:12 is the takeaway today. This verse struck me today. Hatred turns attention to all trangressions. Love covers transgressions. If a matter of transgression occurs, it is right to deal with the transgression, either directly with the offender...or with God (by releasing the trangression to the Lord). Love forgives and acts in this way. Hate (at least one expression of it) is seen when a person wants to bring to light a trangression which is addressed so that all may see it. The purpose in doing this (at a minimum) is to showcase ones own righteousness (look how I forgave) or to showcase the transgressor (look what they did). Love and hate are shown as opposites in this verse. Whether one loves or hates is seen by whether one conceals or reveals a transgression.

Do you and I love people and conceal transgressions that are properly dealt with?

Grace,